Sociological theories describe causes and effects of human behavior; study the social life, and society. Above definition displays two concepts: human being at the micro level and society at the macro level. Sociological imagination is a sociological theory that encapsulates these two concepts: individual, and society…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
Conflict theory envisioned a society as fragmented into groups. More powerful social groups exert forces on less powerful groups. Social imagination discloses the characteristics of social forces when and only when individuals interact with these forces. SOCIAL CONTEXT Definition of social context In a net shell, sociological imagination is an interaction between an individual and social forces. This abstraction points towards the concept of existence of correlation between psychology and sociology. Social context theory reveals this relationship and show societal and social changes over the passage of time, explains the causes that brought changes and offers future change patterns. The model includes three factors: micro socialization process through the behavior of individual and collective of individuals, macro social forces through the social structure, and time (Social context theory). Social context theory is analyzed through social environment dimension and time dimension. Social environment dimension consists of social structures that shape the behavior of individual or group of individuals, social process demonstrates how individuals perceive, interpret and interact with the social structures, and social behavior represents the social realities through behavior of individuals. Time dimension enacts the power of the existing societal forces in maintaining social behavior patters (Social context theory). Social imagination acknowledges the existence of interaction between individual or group of individuals and social forces. Social context theory explains how and why the relationship emerged and what changes the relationship could bring over the passage of time. Specific...
External act of an individual displays what one does, which is the result of cause and effect. The cause aspect defines why one acts in a specific way. Individual act also displays the structural arrangement of a society at a location and a historical point of civilization. Individual act, history, and location are intertwined. Sociological imagination demonstrates how an individual perceives the social forces, as well as the cause and effect relationship of an individual or group of individuals with social issues or social forces. This is why we should care for sociological imagination. The concept social imagination assigns two attributes: an individual or group of individuals and social forces. Social imagination defines the interaction of an individual or group of individuals with social forces. At the same time, the individual is a character located at a certain place in the society. In American society, white, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant, male, heterosexual, upper-middle-class, educated, older defines the social location of a person. Social location defines a person’s place in their particular social order. A person’s bias, belief, and values are shaped based on social locations. Gender, color, economic level, coming from the village or town, healthy or sick, young or old; these are some of attributes of social location. Individuals from similar social location create their own social hierarchy. Social hierarchy classifies individuals in a group based on esteem, prestige, economic success, and accumulation of wealth into social classes.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The interaction between human life and social forces can be interpreted and evaluated using certain sociological concepts. The Sociological Imagination, one of the most known concepts of this kind, has been used as a theoretical framework for explaining the responses of individuals to their social environment but also the power of each social framework to affect the views of individuals in regard to their daily life.
Yet this imagining of the individual cannot stand because the society relies on the individual to shape it – “Neither the life of an individual nor the history of a society can be understood without understanding both” (Mills 1959). The problem, however, is that people do not often imagine the role they play in shaping and repeating the institutions of society – thus they may be victimized by society, and yet not necessarily take any kind of real active stand against the sociological factors that lead to that victimization.
It makes them feel privileged that they are a part of the societal manifestations that one very fondly needs to be within. It is because of this that the students believe that they should be provided with secondary school education so that their domains could be understood in a much better way than if they were not given a chance to acclimatize themselves.
The conclusion from this study states that individuals may utilize their sociological imagination to query largely conventional issues, for example, unemployment and its impact and, therefore, recognize personal experiences and public concerns as different notions of one component. It is evident that Mills believes both society and individuals have an impact on each other.
Instead, the ostrich would not recognize an impending problem and tries to shun danger by refusing to see it.
It is axiomatic in behavior, bird or otherwise, that anything unknown inspires fear and confusion. Thus, people behave much like the ostriches in the face of life situations that seem hard to explain and cope with.
ansformation, taking place in their environment, in the pretext of their socio-political history, which would be highly beneficial for them in respect of understanding the developments being made around them in future years to come. Social imagination, according to Mills, is
Underlying this feeling of being trapped are the seemingly uncontrollable and continuous changes to society.
Almost 50 years has passed since Mills had prescribed solutions to these "traps" which he called sociological imagination. He strongly argued that the sociological imagination will free people from traps as it enables its possessor to "understand the larger historical scene in terms of its meaning for the inner life and the external career of a variety of individuals." However, the present day situation in the global community proves that the operation of sociological imagination was not able to lift the trap engulfing individuals.
I considered choosing other colleges offering this program. After carefully examining various factors, I chose this for it was the best. After consulting widely, I finally settled for this college because of its clear and strict curriculum coupled with its friendly fees that it charges.
Of all the negative effects of war, loneliness is probably the most common. It can occur during any time of transition or disruption. Loneliness is a feeling of deprivation about one's existing social relations. But what makes people feel deprived According to some researchers loneliness is produced by a discrepancy between what we actually have and what we want.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
with a personal 20% discount.