Nobody downloaded yet

How did Max Weber define social class and in what ways did it differ from Marx and Engels approach - Essay Example

Comments (1) Cite this document
Weber developed his ideas in the wake of Marxist thinking, and partly also as a reaction to it. This is seen for example in his description of “class” which is a great deal more nuanced than the pure Marxist binary divide between proletariat and bourgeoisie. For Weber a “class” is defined as “any group of persons occupying the same class status”…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.3% of users find it useful
How did Max Weber define social class and in what ways did it differ from Marx and Engels approach
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "How did Max Weber define social class and in what ways did it differ from Marx and Engels approach"

Download file to see previous pages How did Max Weber define social class and in what ways did it differ from Marx and Engels approach?

Parts of Weber’s theory depend on ideas about power and control that have some affinities with the Marxist concept of class structure. There are differences, however, between Weberian and Marxist theory which. Morrison (2006, p. 276) identifies these as occurring on two main fronts: “ on the nature and purpose of social theory; and second, on the understanding of history and social and economic development.” Very briefly this means that Weber disagreed with Marx’s view that social theory should be used to change society, preferring rather to see its role as a neutral one, observing and classifying what is happening. He also refused to be limited by the rather rigid analysis of economic matters that Marx engaged in, preferring again to reserve judgement on moral issues such as oppression of the poor and capitalist expansion.
Weber recognised the role of money in modern society as being one which involved the exercise of power, and he accepted that it was important, but he did not give it the same level of prominence as Marx did. Weber “took the view that there were other determinants of social life which derived from the political, religious and legal spheres of society” (Morrison, 2006, p. 277). The difference between Marx and Weber, then, is one of emphasis rather than any fundamental disagreement about the importance of economic and social forces. He took the ideas of Marx and Engels a step further and applied them to complex modern societies using tools of scientific observation to try and understand them.
One of Weber’s most useful contributions to the field of sociology has been his theorising of modern bureaucracy. Weber’s idea of bureaucracy was initially described in contrast to more traditional types of authority which are inherited, as for example a chief of a tribe or a modern day monarch. It is contrasted also with the charismatic type of authority that some great religious or ideological leaders have, based on their own individual powers of persuasion (Weber, 1958b, p. 83). According to Weber the basis for acquiring authority in a bureaucracy is rationality. Hierarchies exist in complex societal organisations on the basis of the different abilities that a person has and this explains why some jobs are plentiful and paid at a lower rate while others are much scarcer and paid at a higher rate. These hierarchies are made formal through written contracts, job titles and specifications, and routine systems which set down which functions are carried out at which points in the organisational structure. People have to be trained in order to take up bureaucratic roles, and they have to adhere to a set of complicated rules and procedures. This is because the power lies in the interpretation and dispensation of a system of justice that has been set down in advance. An example of this kind of structure can be observed in modern Britain in institutions such as the criminal justice system. In this field there are particular ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“How did Max Weber define social class and in what ways did it differ Essay”, n.d.)
How did Max Weber define social class and in what ways did it differ Essay. Retrieved from
(How Did Max Weber Define Social Class and in What Ways Did It Differ Essay)
How Did Max Weber Define Social Class and in What Ways Did It Differ Essay.
“How Did Max Weber Define Social Class and in What Ways Did It Differ Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (1)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
josephineconnel added comment 4 months ago
Student rated this paper as
This essay saved me today. I liked the structure. It was very useful for my sociology course.

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF How did Max Weber define social class and in what ways did it differ from Marx and Engels approach

Max Weber the sociologist

...). “In France, the church went out of its way to welcome the honest bourgeois on the ground that he was the only type of man who followed God’s commands and lived in a ‘calling’” (Pierotti, 2003). Max Weber 8 Power Weber’s conception of the nature of power, while very likely more pragmatic (and less resolvable) than Marx’s ideas of social revolution were, in some respects, contradictory and possibly not sufficiently objective in their view of the bourgeois. His assertion that capitalism sprang from the hard work and frugality inherent in the Protestant ethic was perhaps too close to a romanticized picture of the bourgeois struggle against...
9 Pages(2250 words)Research Paper

Max Weber Research Paper

...?Introduction Max Weber was a German philosopher, sociologist, and political economist. He had a profound influence on the discipline of sociology. His influence is seen in social research and formulation of social theory (Encyclopedia Brittanica, n.d.). Weber argued that the societies do not differ on the basis of the products they produce; instead, they are differentiated on the basis of how the individuals view and understand the world and their social surroundings. Weber is regarded as the father of modern social sciences along with Emile Durkheim and Karl...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Max Weber Sociology of Social Action

...). Conclusion In sociology, social action is more advanced than behavior actions or social behavior. It involves more advanced social contact, social interaction, and social relations. From the discussion above on instrumental action, social action is shown as an aspect, which involves action and reaction of both the action doer, and those who are affected by those actions. Actions are defined in terms of the meanings that they carry. References Weber, Max. (1991). "The Nature of Social Action", Max Weber: Selections in Translation. 1st...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Max Weber

...that the religious-based capitalistic views of the Calvinists and other groups offered the foundation for the development of a capitalistic society (Kennedy, 2004). b). Max Weber emphasized the role of social constructions like religion and law in influencing the adoption of different behavioral patterns, and the approaches employed in the economic sphere of the society (Swedberg, 2006). However, he introduces the thinking that while taking the different influencing factors, a sociological outlook should be employed towards the exploration of the motives of social actors, which determine the course of all spheres of...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Max Weber

...Max Weber Max Weber, the of numerous books about sociology of religion greatly focused on the role of religion in modern society since played a great function in historic and autonomous development of the modern economic ethic. Significantly, religion according to Weber constitutes modern process and features of power relations, social and political administration, socio-economic structures, social status and stratification, and others. For instance, Catholic doctrine as formulated by Aquinas differs from earliest Christianity and Stoicism in the viewpoint concerning equality of all human beings. This...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx and Max Weber

...Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx and Max Weber Introduction: Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx and Marx Weber were sociologist who contributed to sociological theory, their theories are today relevant in the society, however critics on their theories have led to some insignificance in their theories, and this paper discusses some of the theories by the scholars and shows their relevance to today society. We focus on the bureaucratization theory, social fact theory, religion, division of labor and specialization and the capitalist theory by Marx. All these theories explain the society we live in today but they also form a basis of determining whether the scholars work is relevant in today’s society. Max Weber: In this section we discuss major... of the...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Max Weber

...' has revealed that it does not follow any type of parallel lines in life in general, and also that the very idea of rationality is both multi directional and multi dimensional. Rationality was, for Weber, the manifestation of individual freedoms, and also another meaning for conceptual lucidity, among various other meanings. (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) According to Max Weber, sociology as such meant that it was nothing but a 'comprehensive science of social action', and it must be also noted that most of Max Weber's ideals stem from the idea that human beings attach a great many subjective meanings to all their...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Max Weber classified in the same category to that of Marx, Darwin and Nietzsche. In this context Weber had to be influenced by such people in his way of thinking. This can be in under epistemology and ethics. Hence, Neo-Kantianism was a German idealism who influenced Weber’s thinking (Kim, 2007). The belief that chaotic and incomprehensible was reality checks were important to Weber’s work. The social sciences methodologies of Weber did finally differ from neo-Kantian and that of Georg Simmel, who was a pioneer in sociology. Kantian ethics also influenced Weber’s work but he...
16 Pages(4000 words)Research Paper

Karl Marx and Max Weber compared

...creative skills. This led to the widening of the differences between the classes in society and this extended into the alienation of people from the various classes, meaning that there was an increase in the probability of conflict taking place. Marx also declares that capitalism did not develop as a consequence of fate but it was as a result of the deliberate actions by human beings whose aim was to better themselves by making use of means which they considered suitable. This led to social disorder whose only solution, Marx suggests, is socialism which would result in the development of a system of...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Max Weber

...and efficiency meant doing something in the most direct way or quickest respectively (“Theories”, 2015). Weber had a significant impact on sociology by coming up with various theories. The theory of verstehen or better known as empathetic understanding, which resulted to the symbolic interactionism in what was fondly called the perspective of interpretive sociology. He enhanced the understanding of the basis of social imbalance. He is also credited with the development of the methodological concept. He further proposed the study of large-scale social processes such as the rise of bureaucratization and importance of rationalisation in the western nations (“Theories”,...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic How did Max Weber define social class and in what ways did it differ from Marx and Engels approach for FREE!

Contact Us