Foreign aid. Does the developed world have an obligation to give aid to the developing world - Essay Example

After an intense discussion and debate on whether the developed world have an obligation to give aid to the developing world or not, we have conclusively accepted that, yes, the developed world is obligated to give aid to the developing world. As a team, we support this motion because of the benefits and facts associated with the aid. The following are some of the reasons why we support the motion that the developed world has an obligation to give aid to the developing world. Although foreign aid is usually regarded as wasted on recipient governments which are sometimes corrupt and being too much in spite of the donor good intentions, Paul Harris (1999) asserts that the aid results to a global gain.

There are various forms of aid that the developed world can offer to the developing world. These may range from food aid, humanitarian assistance, and military assistance. Development aid is helps developing world in reducing poverty levels. The aid from the developed world improves global critical economic infrastructure. This is because poverty in developing countries is a burden of the developed nations in the long run regarding owing debts which may not be settled. According to Philippe Sands (1994), providing aid to the developing world ensures fostering of social change across the globe.

In most developing countries, poverty is associated with lack of democracy and suppression of some particular groups described by gender, ethnicity, religion, race, occupation, or social class among other demographic and biographical factors. When developed countries provide aid to the developing countries, democracy is developed and ensured. Particular interest groups also lobby for the rights of the suppressed groups. Development and growth at home is promoted by the opportunities created abroad.

For instance, China as a nation is very developed due to the aid packages and huge investment it has in Africa. Therefore, the developed countries will also benefit from providing aid to the developing countries. This is a good premise to support the motion. The developed world has a moral obligation to provide aid to the developing country. For instance, if we examine the atrocities of the past where states were designed with no particular regard to their economic independence and stability, it was a moral responsibility to provide aid to the developing countries that are striving to stabilize their economy.

If we refer to the past years when slave trade was a normal and very lucrative, the United Kingdom abolished the lucrative slave trade due to the realization by people that it was a wrong idea. There is also an immense inequality between the developed world and the developing world, this we know is morally not right. We realize this locally at home and should implement it internationally as well. In addition, providing aid to the developing world by the developed world ensures an effective realization of the global public goods.

According to Joel Rosenthal (1999), the things that are beneficial to the entire world are shared and utilized globally when aid is provided where necessary. It is hence significant to support the motion because through that aid, global health, economic stability, environmental welfare, and international security will be enhanced greatly and the whole world will stand a chance of good and effective relationships. It is right to support this motion in that it generally improves the process of economic globalization.

This is accomplished through strengthening liaison and cooperation in the fields of agriculture, industry, finance and trade. Giving aid to the developing world improves mutual developments between the developed world and the developing world. Therefore, it is important to offer technological aid, financial aid, and medical aid to the developing world. It is evident that aids from the developed world improves and optimizes the living standards of people and eradicates or reduces the level of poverty in