Terrorism in the USA - Research Paper Example

Download file to see previous pages The author of the essay "Terrorism" assumes that it is difficult to do away with terrorism because a peculiar definition has not been given to it. “One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.” According to a recent research shows that counter terrorism is as a result of misunderstandings, which have brewed for a long time without solving them. In the long run, a country is at risk of losing lives, investments and many opportunities. It normally occurs when the government meets head to head with the opposition and other people. This style of doing things never works. The main responsibility of a government is to protect its citizens from inside or outside the country. Without security, it is almost impossible to develop economically, politically and socially. A government claims a legitimate monopoly on violence and enforces law and order. It has the authority to stop foreign threats too. The legitimacy of a government is determined internationally by other nations or rather the United Nations. The Taliban claimed to be the nation’s legitimate government. Its efforts were not recognized because this was the work of two states, i.e. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. The claim of the opposition to be the legitimate government is backed up by the quantity of its mass followers. It is the responsibility of established governments to maintain a healthy police system, which will fight violence whenever it arises in a country. Security forces that will enhance security against foreign threats should be put in place. Political violence in a state is extremely dangerous as it is with terrorism. It puts a state into a state of anxiety thus threatening its security. All governments should put in place ways in which they can fight such threats without putting their citizens and its neighboring states in a compromising situation. Most measures of anti terrorism are done by the police and the military army of the country. The best solution should be that they try to strike peaceful talks with the enemy so that they solve the existing conflicts which will ease the pressure and be less costly to the nation’s economy (Vasilios 2). Nations should learn from states like Ireland, Israel, Palestine and Sri Lanka, where a lot of terrorism activities have been happening. This only proves how the state government is not keen in dealing with terrorists. It is with normalcy that, the military has been trained to fight in battles while the police have the skills to deal with normal crime and maintain social order. This should automatically result into a special branch of police like SWAT and other military departments being developed to fight terrorism crimes (Rabkin 2). The question now arises: should political violence and terrorism be looked at from the angle of military or criminal phenomenon? Guerillas, insurgents and rebels consider themselves as real solders and hence demand their respect as soldiers. Remember guerilla was a traditional method used in the agrarian revolution by the barbaric societies. These malicious groups may control a region like a real military. This happens mostly in the rural areas and not in urban areas because there is no room for such. It will be put in its place by the state security immediately. It will be impossible for such groups to show up publicly putting on their uniforms in urban areas and cause violence. When there is an opposition that is violent, it can as well be termed as a terrorist group. An opposition can be viewed to be violent in terms of killings and property damage. So as to understand the concept, in 1972, British soldiers opened fire to a protesting crowd killing about 12 citizens who were unarmed. This could also be another type of terrorism, “state terror” which was used to make the protestors to fear and be intimidated. In 1996, IRA bombed the London’ ...Download file to see next pagesRead More