Critical review of journal article - Assignment Example

The research describes the normal situation where people with disabilities feel degraded or dehumanized by the way many able-bodied people stare at their disabilities. The research focused on studying the interaction between able-bodied persons and Elton, disabled person. The study was rightfully conducted in the coffee shop as well as the public bar (Cohen 2007). The research shows that Elton and the other research respondents use visual symbols to study the approachability, status, attractiveness, ability, and quality of the character.

The research is correctly geared towards determining the interaction between able-bodied persons and the disabled persons (Gratton 2010). Evidence presented by the author The author correctly presents convincing evidence on the disability topic (Trochim 2006). The author uses secondary references to persuade the readers to accept the author’s concepts on the interaction between able-bodied persons and disabled persons. The author uses Woodill’s reference to indicate there is a wide rage of insights as to why the able –bodied individuals have difficulty socializing with people with physical disabilities (Jackson 2010). . The symbols include emotions, gestures, concepts, or abstracts.

The author also mentions the difficulty of able-bodied persons to stare at the disabled persons. The stare can be interpreted in terms of both the parties’ cultural background and context. Consequently, the able-bodied persons’ stares correctly trigger social trauma among the disabled persons (Graziano 2009). In fact, the author presents Goffman’s argument that staring is synonymous with the invasion of the disabled person’s privacy rights. Often, the able bodied person will feel uncomfortable when confronted by the disabled persons due to ignorance.

The able-bodied person fears that any good intentioned move may be misinterpreted as damaging or humiliating to the eyes of the disabled person. The author correctly emphasizes that an experiment had been conducted in order to enable the analysis of the parties’ behavior as well as body language. The author reiterates that the dynamics at work with disabled persons exchanging pleasantries and other similar activities are described as contradictory and complicated. To remedy the situation, the able-bodied persons can do their share to ensure that the interaction of the able-bodied persons to concentrate on addressing the staring and other dehumanizing activities of the able-bodied persons.

Lastly, the author recommends that all able-bodied persons must adjust their current temperament and attitude to ensure the successful diffusion of the dehumanizing star. The timely intervention is worth the hard work to ensure compliance with eliminating the dehumanizing acts of the able-bodied persons. The assumptions on which