Differences between Realism Liberalism and World System View of International Relations - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Discuss the most important differences between realism, liberalism and world system view of international relations with respect to actor’s motive force and values. 1. Introduction The explanation of critical decisions in the context of international community is usually based on certain principles and ethics, which are likely to be differentiated in countries worldwide…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.7% of users find it useful
Differences between Realism Liberalism and World System View of International Relations
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Differences between Realism Liberalism and World System View of International Relations"

Download file to see previous pages The characteristics of realism, liberalism and the world system view of international relations (IR) are reviewed in this paper especially in regard to actor’s motive force and values. At the same time, the historical development of these frameworks is presented and evaluated, at the level that it can explain their current form and role in IR. It is made clear that all three frameworks are critical for the evaluation of IR but it seems that not all of them are equally powerful in influencing key decisions related to IR. Realism and world system view of IR are based on rules, which are more aligned with the needs and the challenges of IR; on the other hand, liberalism is less involved in critical IR decisions since their core principles, which is the natural law which promotes morality, cannot support or tolerate the violation of human rights or other important values, in opposition with realism and world system view which leave space for such phenomena. 2. ...
Emphasis should be given on History of Peloponnesian War as a text highlighting the key aspects of IR. In accordance with the above text, ‘moral principles are irrelevant to international affairs’ (Korab-Karpowicz 2010, p.1). Through the centuries, realism has been developed using different criteria. The most critical example is the involvement of ‘Machiavellan arguments’ (Ioana 2009, p.44) for explaining the role of realism in IR. Three are the key points of the above arguments: a) ‘history is created through causes and effects’ (Ioana 2009, p.44), b) theory is resulted from practice and c) politics are not relevant to ethics (Ioana 2009). The three different concepts, ‘history, reality and policy’ (Smith 1999, p.37), as developed by Machiavelli constitute the basis of realism in its current form. Towards the same direction, Niebuhr noted that realism could be explained for interpreting IR but it should be developed incorporating concepts such as ‘social ethics and social processes’ (Smith 1999, p.40). In accordance with Sutch and Elias (2007) the most appropriate explanation of liberalism would be the following one: ‘liberalism relies on claims about the impact of interdependence, the benefits of free trade, collective security and the existence of a real harmony of interests between states’ (Sutch and Elias 2007, p.65). In other words, the issues that liberalism highlights are related to the needs and the economic/ political interests of modern states. From this point of view, liberalism is likely to be changed periodically, following the change in political, economic and social trends worldwide. The basis of liberalism can be identified in the natural law theory, which was developed by John Locke (Sutch and Elias 2007, ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Differences between Realism Liberalism and World System View of Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/sociology/1437750-discuss-the-most-important-differences-between
(Differences Between Realism Liberalism and World System View of Essay)
“Differences Between Realism Liberalism and World System View of Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1437750-discuss-the-most-important-differences-between.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Differences between Realism Liberalism and World System View of International Relations

International Relations: Realism and Liberalism

...?WHY DO LIBERAL THEORISTS CLAIM THAT REALISTS HAVE COMPLETELY ‘OVERLOOKED’ THE SPREAD OF ‘LIBERAL PEACE’ IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS? Tutor: Date: Introduction International relations theory has been dominated by the realism because during the World War II liberalism was replaced being a paradigm. With time, liberals restructured their surfaces since they witnessed the state being challenged and they were sure the realists were not ale to account for anything that was going to happen. Since then there has been misunderstanding between the two paradigms. In...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Possibilities for peace in the international system: realism versus liberalism

...Relations are seen to be second- image approaches (Waltz, 1959), which means that explanations of international processes and outcomes are located at the state level (Panke and Risse, 2007). The vast range of liberal approaches include such that regard domestic actors, or rather, their interactions in the societal, political and economic spheres, as the most important explanatory factors (variables), as well as other, predominantly focused on political constitutions, economic systems or dominant ideologies as domestic structures (Panke and Risse, 2007). Second-image approaches are also seen to comprise different dependant variables, namely foreign-policy...
16 Pages(4000 words)Essay

Realism, Liberalism and Marxism

...important theories of international relations and every theory and ideology had a great impact in different era of time in the World history. Liberalism which presents the most feasible and practicable model of the three is currently the most popular ideology in the world and the majority of governments in various countries of the world follow the liberal ideology and it is being considered as the way forward because even if it does not solve the various issues, but it’s the most natural and practicable of the three systems. References Stremmel, K. (2004) Realism,...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Differences between Realism and Neo-realism

...? Differences between Realism and Neo-realism Differences between Realism and Neo-realism Realism and neo-realism are theories of international relations; a theory is a thought that might be tested. Scientists define a theory as not simply a speculation, but a fact-based outline that describes certain incidences. The benefit of understanding theories of International Relations is that it permits an individual to carry out complicated analyses of ideas regarding International...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Liberal view of international relations

...Liberal view of international relationsInternational relations deals with the study of state issues and affairs in the international arena. It also includes a look at the role of state and non state actors such as the international organizations and the multinational corporations. More over, it also deals with the formulation and conduct of foreign policy. That is, the policies formulated by state governments to guide their relations with other states in the international realm. That said, the study of international relations would not...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

On Liberalism and Realism of International Relations

...On Liberalism and Realism of International Relations There are two differing point of views in the field of international relations that have distinct perspectives on the way they view international politics, diplomatic affairs, and warfare or conflict. On one side of the spectrum is the school of thought called Liberalism, and on the other side is Realism or Realpolitik political thinking. Each of their distinctive natures and rationales will be discussed further on. Liberalism holds that the concepts of morality,...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Liberalism and Realism

...Liberalism and Realism A paradigmatic approach to international relations refers to the view of the world. The worldview includes agreement such as on what the basic needs are and an explanation to the core problems. It also seeks the appropriate theory to give an explanation. Although other scientists argue paradigms in definite terms, political scientists feel that everyone has a different view about the international system as much as it concerns the physical world (Shimko 331-332). All paradigms try to achieve all but the same thing. The paradigms...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Realism Vs. Liberalism in terms and regards of International Relations

...as the interactions of all stakeholders involved in setting nationally interested policies and the related diplomacy required to execute said policies (Pante & Risne, 2007). This wide view of international relations will test both realism and liberalism since both theories were established to explain the actions and reactions of the individual citizen, but have subsequently been grafted on to the study of state systems. Therefore, both theories look to extrapolate the individual to the structure vision. This also proposes that both theories gaze to the state as the principle actors (Morgenthau, 1946). Of course, it...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Realism and liberalism

.... They consider states as the main actors in international politics, they also believe that states characteristics do vary, and these have great effects on the behaviors of the states. In addition, they believe that some internal arrangements are preferable to others. For liberals, there are bad and good states. The liberals treat states as the major actors in the global politics. Good states are believed to pursue policies of cooperation and hardly ever start wars, whereas states regarded as "bad" initiate conflicts with other states and were willing to use force to get their way. In contrast to liberals, Realists are pessimistic when it comes to global...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

World Politics in International Relations: Realism

...institutions, which are based on achieving international cooperation and security. This results to conflicts between the states.5 Alternative explanation for international relations and how it fills the realism gap Realism theory is an alternative theory for explaining international relations. It is an idealism theory which emphasizes that the states should consider their foreign policy goals to be their internal political philosophy. This liberal theory was intended to emerge after the Second World War. The theory holds that what determine the state...
4 Pages(1000 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Differences between Realism Liberalism and World System View of International Relations for FREE!

Contact Us