The significance of the issue is seen in terms of supporting basic human rights pursuant to the principles of American democracy and several researches that validate the fact that children could be holistically raised by same sex couples. …
Download file to see previous pages...
Letting Gays Adopt Children
The paper has thereby supported arguments that showed greater benefits towards allowing same sex couples to adopt children, one of which is support for the basic principles of American Democracy. The adoption actually legitimizes same sex relationships; and although heterosexual marriages are not affected, same sex adoption would strengthen homosexual relationships enabling them to provide a more holistic environment and support for the children.
The American Academy of Pediatrics revealed the findings that “no data have pointed to any risk to children of growing up in a family with one or more gay parents” (Laumann, 2002, p. 344). The current research therefore aims to provide arguments that support allowing same sex couples to adopt children. The article published in The First Post entitled Pros and Cons: Gay Adoption (2007) presented relevant details that provide advantages and disadvantages of allowing same sex couples to adopt children. The article revealed that there are five distinct advantages ranging from: (1) the ability to give adopted children a more secure home; (2) two full time parents are more beneficial than single parents; (3) the option for artificial insemination to female gay parents have been proven to create raising well-balanced children; (4) barring gay parents from adoption is a discriminatory act; and (5) the shortage of adoptive parents make this alternative a better option than foster care system. These advantages give credence and support to same sex couples being more advantageous in terms of providing holistic support to children than opting for foster care and giving the couples enhanced privilege for a stronger bond through the experience of raising children. On the other hand, arguments against gay adoption have these following supportive statements: (1) the children’s need for role models for both sexes is not satisfied; (2) gay adoption is contrary to Christian teaching; and (3) society simply views gay parenting unconventional and wrong. These disadvantages stem from some researches that indicate that the traditional basic framework and ideal familial environment is that children need biological parents. As validated by Staver (2004), “children who are raised outside of intact marriages, where there is a mother and a father, are at greater risk for a large number of serious personal and social problems, even after controlling for race, income, and family background” (10). Further, the adoption of children by same sex couples has been viewed as contrary to the cultural tradition of marriage. The importance of linking marriage to culture has been validly cited by Jost (2003) as he noted: “recognizing gay marriage ‘breaks down thousands of years of culture’, add the Family Research Council’s Mackey” (Jost, 2003, p. 728). Somerville (2003) added that “marriage carries important norms and values, “memes” (long standing units of deep cultural information passed on from generation to generation) related to reproduction…Extending marriage to include same-sex couples (or de-legislating marriage) would seriously harm all of these societal level functions of the institution of marriage” (5). Following this path of reasoning, same sex couples should therefore not be allowed to adopt children as the very foundation of their union is not accepted in traditional cultural norms. Despite the disadvantages and counterarguments, there are numerous contentions that support allowing same sex couples to adopt children are as follows: when state legislations allow same sex couples to marry and adopt children, they abide by the basic principles of American democracy. The basic principles of democracy on equality states that “all individuals are valued equally, have equal opportunities, and may not be
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
However, there are those of the view that homosexuality as a transgression and that anyone who is gay or a lesbian should be barred from serving in the military or doing anything meaningful (230). I tend to think that the latter worldview is distorted and highly prejudicial.
From among the arguments of advocates supporting same sex couples to adopt children, the following major contentions would be expounded: (1) when state legislations allow same sex couples to marry and adopt children, they abide by the basic principles of American democracy; (2) children with gay or lesbian parents fare as well as those raised in families with a mother and a father; (3) approving gay adoption would not hurt or compromise the traditional heterosexual marriage, nor the children be hurt by being raised in homosexual relationships within the home; and (4) parents, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender, are good parents and want only the best for their children.
This is evident from the number of children in orphanages, who need to be adopted, cared for and loved. What rights do heterosexual couples or other people have to tell same sex couples, that they cannot parent and love a child, just as they do or even better?
Many are the times they have been vilified, with many countries around the world making homosexuality a crime punishable heavily under their laws. Most of the people against homosexuality do so because of religious and cultural beliefs, as well as fear and lack of understanding of people who practice homosexuality (Manalansan 10-50).
Reality is when one looks at the alarming rate of increase of the number of orphans it would be best that these laws allow for such adoptions to occur. The gays and lesbians in the society are just like the heterosexuals. They do not have a mental disorder.
This task naturally becomes harder to achieve when the model of family raising the children does not conform to accepted social norms. In both developed as well as developing nations, a large percentage of the society does not agree with the notion of same sex parents adopting children or having them through surrogates by way of artificial insemination.
Conservative groups such as Concerned Women for America say the research is flawed” (par. 6).
Jost (2003) has revealed that approving gay adoption would not hurt or compromise the traditional heterosexual marriage, nor
The legalization of same-sex marriages is a topic of debate not only in the United States in the entire world. In the United States, the campaign to legalize same sex marriages has been on for more than
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Letting Gays Adopt Children for FREE!