Critical race theory The term “critical race theory” illustrates a specific set of practices and theories that were advanced by contemporary scholars of different origins, among them African American, Asian American and Latino. The theory strives to advance a social justice framework by making redress to social injustices among our societies, thus the word “critical”. The theory gives emphasize on materialist analyses of race and racism, especially in the ways in which societies are globalised in a racialised in terms of ethnicity and religion.
The theory also focuses on structures of power through nationalist ideologies (Fredrickson, 2002). Awareness of race issues is integral to how individuals learn and perceives others around them, no matter how they may fail to confess it; for example the way we depict others – “an aged black man; a short Asian woman in her early twenties”. As such, making out an illustration of someone on basis of race and gender is common in Australia, especially if it’s someone else a part from a white (Von Hirchfeld & Downs, 2011).
Racism continues to be a problem in Australia In his article, “Idea of a fair society taken for a ride”, Ross Gittens depicts how Australia is not a racist nation compared to other nations around the world, he suppose that Australia is less racist that some nations (Gitten, 2013). However, Gittens suppose that issues of race and racism are common and he can’t exclude Australia to be a perfect as it poses some combination of good and bad. Gittens worry is that whoever tries to depict Australia as racist country, should know that it is not, and no matter people perceive the terrible arrival of many uninvited boat people, as politician express harsh treatment of these interlopers because of fear of these foreigners getting to the head of the jobs queue-the main concern of Julia Gillard (Gitten, 2013).
But this has nothing to do with issues of racism, as Gillard reassured his electorate in 2010 that they should not be swayed on matters of asylum seekers debate. Owing to the fact that many Australian are concerned about the border security does not make them to be racists. Racial discrimination has all along been the matter of concern by economists, on grounds of how it relates to labour market and economic growth. The global market may vary because of consumer behavior, language, legal system, technology infrastructure, business culture, educational system, labour relations, political ideology, fiscal regime and so forth (Von Hirchfeld & Downs, 2011).
These issues have posed a great challenge to managers who are operating across borders businesses on how to adapt to the international diversity encountered or overcome the constraints imposed to their business by national systems, structures and behaviours. The issue of favourism on basis of race in Australia is depicted from study on buses from Brisbane, carried out by two economists from University of Queensland, Redzo Mujcic and Professor Paul Frijters, regarding the response drivers had on travelers whose card were not working.
Given the testers of Indian, Japanese, Malaysian, Chinese, Caucasians and Black drivers, about 6% of them favoured a person of his or her race (Gitten, 2013). On basis of dressing code, in business suits with briefcases, the success rate of whites rose by 21% points whereas the combined rate of blacks and Indian rose to 75%. While, on grounds of military clothes, the success rate of whites rose to 25% point whereas the combined rate of Blacks and Indian rose to 85%. The pictures of the same testers were presented to bus drivers at Brisbane and asked whether they would allow them with an empty travel card, where 80% of drivers said they would give free rides to Indians and Blacks, but in reality less than 50% were let on.
Concerning the white testers, 5% points less than the black counterpart will be let on, whereas in reality, more than 40% of white testers were favoured than blacks.
Read More