Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
The right argument is morally better than violence. The paper "Consensus Between Violence And Argument" discusses the thesis about that all conflicts should and must be settled in a peaceful way. It also gives information about the structure of right argument or argumentation…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "Consensus Between Violence And Argument"
Download file to see previous pages
Eristic dialogue covers argumentation, a social debate where victory over an antagonist is the primary goal. This art of right argument protects their self-interest incoherent dialogue and in the process of dialogue. The art of argumentation is used in law, in trials when preparing arguments for court presentation and in the testing legitimacy of evidence. Right argument comprises identifying premises where conclusions are derived, the establishment of “burden of proof” to determine the person who made an initial claim and identifying goals of contributors in dialogue. At the end of an argument, a valid conclusion must be given with good reason explaining the same. A good argument must be built with two premises and one concluding remark. Argumentation is good in a situation where evidence does not exist especially in handling scientific, epistemic, nature, and moral where science cannot apply. Violence is good in handling dispute like border disputes, insurgency, and hostility. In politics, some kinds of argumentation are morally wrong, and some kinds of violence are morally right. Argumentation is never a solution in many nations since it only works when there is peace in the nation, and no other nation wants to attack the nation in question. Argumentation is morally upright only if the nations under conflict also handle disputes through argumentation. If the nations under disagreement handle the dispute in different angles, then violence is morally right for a nation to defend itself from intrusion.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
(“Consensus Between Violence And Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/social-science/1701196-consensus-between-violence-and-argument
(Consensus Between Violence And Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
“Consensus Between Violence And Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1701196-consensus-between-violence-and-argument.
Cited: 0 times
CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Consensus Between Violence And Argument
...? Relationship betweenviolence and power Introduction Power and violence are not the same. Power is psychological, a moral force that makes people want to obey. Violence enforces obedience through physical coercion. Those who use violence may manage to temporarily impose their will, but their command is always tenuous because when the violence ends, or the threat of it lessens, there is even less incentive to obey the authorities (Power and violence, n. d) Power and violence seem to have close relationships. It is difficult for a person to engage in violent activities without power. Hitler succeeded in killing thousands of Jews because of the power he had. Same way Saddam succeeded in killing thousands of Kurds because of the political...
...?Consensus on Global Warming Introduction The role of human contributions in the gradual rise of global warming is becoming increasingly arguable on scientific grounds, and people have started to locate the roots of the problem is other environmental and political factors as well. Scientists from both schools of thought are presenting arguments and intensified research is being conducted to strengthen these arguments. More recently, few scientists have vigorously challenged the concept that human activities are a major contributor towards the issue of global warming. This has introduced some new areas of debate which require a solid scientific intervention to achieve a consensus on the issue. What is the debate? The arguments that come...
... making. While Pimlott implements a number of notions within this spectrum of investigation, perhaps the central thorough-put of his argument is the contention that rather than constituting an actual consensus, this notion has been constructed by individuals attempting to establish a mythic ‘golden age’ of British history. As noted, this perspective has been embraced by a large number of theorists (Rollings 1994; Kelly 2002; Ellison 1994). The broad spectrums of these theoretical perspectives have considered a variety of ideological differences that occurred between the main political parties during this period. Rather than constituting a golden age of consensus politics, Pimlott (1994, p. 231) notes that there was considerable Conservative...
...Topic; Washington Consensus March 8, 2008 It was the famous economist and american think tank John Williamson who coined the term Washington Consensus. This term refers to the following policies prescribed by the reform package of the consensus in 1989 originally aimed at radical economic reforms in the developing world (Williamson John 1989). In tandem took place the creation of International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank (WB) and US treasury Department.
1- Trade liberalization
2- Increase in the interest rates
3- Privatization of public enterprizes and deregulation of economy
4- Tax reforms
5- Withdrawl of subsidies
6- Decrease in the social spendings by the states
7- Protection of intellectual property rights
... recipe for disaster. Mainly because the policies being dictated by the institutions are biased and inadequate especially for the states with low income, high interest rate and an underdeveloped industrial base. Secondly, these institutions lack credibility and accountability themselves, and so when they advocate for such measures, the developing world poses certain questions. Thus, in the light of these arguments, it is best for the global economic market to completely denounce the Post-Washington Consensus, and drive the world towards a more equitable and just system, where a state can take its own decision. This way, even is the economy of a state collapses, the responsibility won`t lie with the IFI`s or Washington, rather that would...
...Consensus Building Consensus Building As the head nurse, what should Mitchell do a Eliminate infighting and hostility at the workplace?
The main cause of the resentment in this floor is the mistrust that exists between nurses and their assistants. The assistants think that the nurses assign them the hardest tasks while the nurses believe that the assistants do not offer them help when it is necessary. These two arguments are contradictory because while the assistants argue that they overwork; their seniors argue that they spend most of their time relaxing. This indicates there is a high level of mistrust among the two groups, which Mitchell needs to correct. Mitchell may correct this situation by organizing participative meetings for all...
... Violence and American Identity According to Smith-Rosenberg, the primary component of national identity in United States is characterized by the need to violently exclude others. According to her, the difference which is defined by exclusion lay deeply in the hearts of European Americans. The natives refer themselves as “us” while describing others as them. “Others” have become the means of unification. However, the attempt to create an American Identity based on equality, republicanism, and commercial capitalism has led to cultural and economic divisions. In addition, the move has created racial and gender discrimination. The attempts to remark women, natives, rural farmers, and slaves divided the American society. She argues...
Various psychologists have come up with numerous studies on the false consensus effect. In doing so, they have given several interpretations of the definition of such a concept. However, the most prevalent definition associated with the false consensus effect is that used by Mullen et al (1985):
False consensus refers to an egocentric bias that occurs when people estimate consensus for their own behaviors. Specifically, the false consensus hypothesis holds that people who engage in a given behavior will estimate that behavior to be more common than it is estimated to be by people who engage in alternative behaviors.
Basically, the false consensus effect is the tendency for individuals to put too much weight on the...
..., its meaning, application, success and failure (Harvard University, 2003). Even the existence of the consensus is debated (Akbar, 2005). Keeping that aside since it is beyond the scope of this paper, it can be clearly seen that the elements of the Washington Consensus are directly connected to many social and economic policy issues that are mandated by the IMF. Therefore the connection between the IMF and the Washington Consensus is worth looking into.
The history of this connection is particularly interesting since it has its roots in the decades after World War II. The economies of the world and the international monetary system were in chaos after the war and the IMF was established as a part of the Bretton Woods system to monitor...
12 Pages(3000 words)Assignment
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Consensus Between Violence And Argument"
with a personal 20% discount.