Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

American Foreign Policy in a New Era - Coursework Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The paper "American Foreign Policy in a New Era" is purposed to give a response to the study of Robert Jervis - "American Foreign Policy in a New Era". Jervis relies on realism, liberalism, and constructivism approaches to support the developments he discusses…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.4% of users find it useful
American Foreign Policy in a New Era
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "American Foreign Policy in a New Era"

Response Response Robert Jervis discusses the existence of a security community by establishing a pluralistic security community formed by the most powerful nations where the idea of war among them is all but unthinkable (Jervis, 2005). Apparently, Jervis relies on realism, liberalism, and constructivism approaches to support the developments he discusses.
Realism approach was dominant theoretically during the cold war. Realism portrays international affairs as the pursuit for power among self-centred states that is a cynical representation of prospects that mitigate war and conflict (Jervis, 2005). Realism approach was dominant during the cold war since it offered powerful and easy definitions of imperialism, alliances, war and other international events. Realism adopted a consistent competition analysis that was fundamental in the American-Soviet conflict.
Challenges to realism originated from liberal theories. Liberalism argued that interdependence on the economy discouraged nations from using force because warfare threatens prosperity of all sides (Jervis, 2005). The other school of thought argued that the manifest democracy derived peace across the world based on the claim that democratic states were peaceful compared to authoritarian states. The third school of thought believed that international institutions could encourage nations to forego gains that were greater than cooperation (Jervis, 2005).
While liberalism and realism focused on factors that led to material growth such as trade and power, constructivist approach concentrated on the effect of ideas (Jervis, 2005). Constructivist theories do not assume that states seek survival only. Ideally, these theories argue that states are a product that is malleable for historic and specific processes. The approach pays more attention on the root course of a change compared to liberalism and realism.
Jervis, R. (2005). American Foreign Policy in a New Era. London: Routledge. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“American Foreign Policy in a New Era Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 23”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(American Foreign Policy in a New Era Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words - 23)
“American Foreign Policy in a New Era Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words - 23”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF American Foreign Policy in a New Era

American foreign policy

Moreover, according to Lang (2003), it should be identified who would be allowed to perform the intervention, how humanitarian intervention should be established, and whether there are provisions under which consent to intervene becomes a responsibility. Humanitarian intervention is normally talked about as an exemption to the nonintervention rule. This rule points out that states are prohibited to use their power, and definitely to exercise force, within other states’ jurisdiction. The rule has received strong patronage from the United Nations Charter, which allows states to protect themselves from attacks but prohibits employing the military against the political autonomy or territorial sovereignty of other states (Lang 2003)....
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

American Foreign Policy

..., P. (2008). Understanding Global Security. Washington: Taylor & Francis. Morrison, P., & Tsipis, K. (2002). Reason enough to hope: America and the world of the twenty- first century. MIT Press. Stokes, D., & Sam, R. (2010). Global Energy Security and American Hegemony Themes in global social change. JHU Press. Foley M., & Owens, J. (2006) Congress and the Presidency: Institutional Politics in a Separated System. Washington: Prentice Hall corp. Kimberley, J. (2007). Governing the American state: Congress and the new federalism. Wilson, E. (2004) Diversity and U.S. foreign policy: a reader Routledge, Merrill, D., & Paterson, T. (2009). Major Problems in American Foreign Relations: Since 1914 Cengage Learning....
8 Pages(2000 words)Assignment

American foreign policy

heir own spheres of influence, thus playing a role in shaping the final outcome within the policy making process. Keeping in line with what Robert Divine had once remarked, “From the Revolution to the Cold War, Americans have been willing to fight for their interests, their beliefs, and their ambitions” (Divine, 1965, 172), there are clear evidences which suggest that the American foreign policies after the WWII, have roots in its domestic issues, concerns, and interests. Various researches on the subject of US international relations have distinguished 3 specific factors that appear to exert their influences on the foreign policies of the country, especially after the end of the WWII. ...
Discussion The official goals of US f...
14 Pages(3500 words)Essay

American Foreign Policy since 1877

... such as Asia & Latin America, more aggressive measure were taken to open markets.”5 Roosevelt handled an aggressive strategy of expansion into European and East Asian markets in spite of the distance with an intention to extend the American power over the Pacific. From the earlier times, in the case of China’s market, the American foreign policies were maximally dominated by its commercial interest. The ‘open-door policy’ in 1899 by John Hay claimed to have equal trading access to the China market for America, and other nations including Great Britain, Germany, France, Italy, Russia and Japan. Their new aggressive form of expansionism as part of foreign policy was justified as it was envisioned as an expansion of its economic interests...
4 Pages(1000 words)Assignment

American Foreign Policy

... American Foreign Policy Since the early ages, man has tried great endeavors in an attempt to take control or influence others. In the early days, this desire was fulfilled through battles and conquests. Today, a more subtle way has emerged – which often involves use of dialogue and persuasion. These forms of power are known as hard and soft power respectively. This paper is an analysis of application of the two forms of powers in the light of the U.S. government. Hard power is a concept that illustrates use of coercive and aggressive means to influence interests and behaviors of other countries. This form of power is often employed by a country having more economic and military power over its subject. This form of power is usually...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

American Foreign Policy

...American Foreign Policy During War of Independence, America opened its foreign policy account with an astonishingly beneficial relationship with France. France, who never had a proper relationship with Britain, in those days of British supremacy could hit it off very well with the new nation, mainly due to contributions made by prominent figures like Lafayette. When country won independence, a carefully crafted Constitution was adapted with great attention and detail towards foreign policy. Due to the high significance attached to foreign policy, the creators of Constitution were apprehensive about the future handling of important decisions. In this apprehension, the country’s founding fathers seem to have given overlapping powers...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

American Foreign Policy

aling with the two determinant factors differ between the realist approach and the idealist approach; the two approaches that have been exercised by different American leaders while each still adopts the same objectives of foreign policy1. How do these divergent approaches achieve foreign policy with the same goals?
We analyze the realist foundations upon which President Bush’s administration was based versus the idealist foundations upon which President Obama’s administration is based. To achieve this, the paradigms of realism which underlay Bush’s foundation are hereafter explored2.
The tenets of realism that Bush administration grew on included: firstly, nations or countries are the vital targets of foreign policy but t...
8 Pages(2000 words)Assignment

American Foreign Policy

...American Foreign Policy al Affiliation “Is the United s in Hegemonic Decline?” The United s of America is not in hegemonic decline. This is basically because it continues to reign in international relationships. Global hegemony is a situation where one nation or state has a predominant role in organization, regulation and stabilization of the global political economy (Jerel and Scott 2014, 58). U.S.A currently exists as the only super power in the world and still yields the greatest regional and global influence. Reports foretelling that the nation is in hegemonic decline are only raw data yet it is the international relationships that undergird a superpower. A global hegemony cannot be decided based on public opinion. What matters...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

American Foreign Policy

...AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY”         al Affiliation   What is the foreign policy bureaucracy, its component and history? How does ithelp and hurt the president’s ability to govern? The U.S. foreign policy is run and administered through a bureaucratic process in the federal government. Decision making in foreign policy, hence, involves actors from the state bureaucracy. The main actors are in the departments of finance, defense, the state and foreign ministry. In this process, it is common to see them pushing most of the interests their way. The foreign policy bureaucratic process is composed of the diplomatic unit (foreign affairs), security, economic affairs (finance), and the intelligence. Thesis: Foreign policy bureaucracy is both...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Gorbachevs New Foreign Policy

...Gobachev’s ‘New Foreign Policy’ Mikhail Gorbachevs ‘New Thinking’ was not just a catchphrase for a new foreign policy built upon traditional Russian ideologies. The revolutionary concept began during the decline of the Soviet Union in the 1980’s. It was based on the idea that there can be a relationship between national and internal security and that military power is not the only method to provide a secure national defense. The transformation in foreign policy thinking profoundly impacted policy making and was based on the realization that the real security threat to Russia came from the deteriorating economy due to excessive military spending. Rather than applying the overt exhibition of military power, Gorbachev chose to apply...
7 Pages(1750 words)Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Coursework on topic American Foreign Policy in a New Era for FREE!

Contact Us