Download file to see previous pages...
Emphasis is placed on the problem of spam on the commercial free speech. The argument in relation to the ethical agreement of commercial spam emphasizes upon the moral standard in terms of the freedom of expression among individuals. Globally the freedom of expression among individuals is protected as a result of the benefits that are associated with the application of freedom of expression. Thus, freedom of expression is an important requisite in a liberal democratic state. The freedom of expression entails commercial forms of expression such as the use of spam (Spinello, 2006).
Spam should therefore be protected as a commercial free speech. This is attributed to the fact that if the use of such spams are not protected various contents that can be considered as harmful may be consumed by individuals. This protection will therefore entail various forms of restrictions that will ensure that only credible form of information is consumed by the audience. Various countries such as China and United States have engaged in some form of restriction of spam as a commercial free speech in order to take care of such contents such as pornography (Rooksby, 2007).
However, there are enough reasons in relation to the fact that commercial expression should not be protected as a form of free speech among individuals. Commercial expressions in its essence do not promote truth as an essential aspect in free speech or freedom of expression. Furthermore, spams are not known to promote the beliefs or opinions of individuals in the freedom of expression. Thus, the use of spam as a commercial expression should not be protection as it does not promote truth in its expression (Rooksby, 2007).
Additionally, citizens of any particular state have a right in regards to freedom of expression. This right to liberty therefore guarantees an individual with a right to
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Without free speech, there is the inability to express the debates and problems within society while showing opinions of others about a given topic. If this communication is closed, then there is the inability to make decisions and remain free. By understanding the mechanics of free speech as well as how it affects the freedom of a community then remains necessary to maintaining free thought in a culture.
A society which promotes free speech brings with itself many promises and hopes of a prosperous society. While there are numerous benefits of a society that is build on the foundations of free speech it sometimes also has to face negative consequences. A free society provides opportunities to the people to have an open discussion about the existing problems in the society; hence people can take their voice to the higher authorities and protest against any government policies and practices which they oppose.
The First Amendment involves expressing one’s own idea freely while taking responsibility about what has been said. As shown by Stanley Fish, one good example of a true First Amendment hero is a basketball player who turned her back on the flag during the singing of the national anthem to protest against government policies.
The U.N fights for Internet rights by declaring them as a human right for the universe to be able to access basic information and communication services (Hayes 98). Use of Internet around the world has grown rapidly due to the market saturation and growth of industrialized countries.
The main practitioners of this form of government were Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini. Nazism suppressed free speech and led to the crushing of dissent that would have enabled a rethinking of its benefits. This paper shall look at the subject of free speech and Nazism and how the two affected one another.
For example, many an expert considers deportation of a foreign peace activist Scott Parkin from Australia in September 2005 as an attack on free speech. On the other hand, federal government claimed this move as a necessity because it was a matter of national security (2).
According to the paper over the years, there has been growing conflict between different ideologies, social institutions, groups and individuals as pertaining to the promotion or limitation of the freedom of expression / speech. Although the freedom of speech is regarded as one of democracy’s most cherished values, critics of the freedom of speech argue that absolute freedom of expression can end up permitting anti- woman and often hurtful, racist messages which have been crafted with the main objective of victimizing people.
Any speech that seeks to promote a commercial transaction b is a commercial speech. Businesses and individuals engage in different forms of communication whenever promoting their ideas and products. For a business to make sales, it must engage itself in
1). When the case of hate speech is anonymous, the victim of this hate speech cannot be able to defend him or herself and this makes the sender of the message hateful and cowardly. However, responding to hate messages in a verbal manner is not always advised since this
Lopez, a mother to a high school student in the same institution who looked through the book that her son had checked out form the library and immediately noted its sexual content and its inappropriateness to kids such as her own 14-year-old (Williams). The student checked it
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Commercial Free Speech for FREE!