Commercial Free Speech - Essay Example

Commercial Free Speech Commercial Free Speech Introduction The invention of the use of the internet was considered as an important milestone in the freedom of expression. However, this freedom of expression of has been threatened by spam. The problem of spam threatens the freedom of speech globally. Spam is regarded as an unwanted bulk form of email. In addition, junk form of email is a threat to the computer as a form of communication device as it can crush the entire system. The essay will therefore engage in a discussion in relation to the protection of spam as a commercial free speech (Spinello, 2006).

According to Spinello (2006) the ethical perspective of the problem of spam among internet users is a key issue in computer ethics. Emphasis is placed on the problem of spam on the commercial free speech. The argument in relation to the ethical agreement of commercial spam emphasizes upon the moral standard in terms of the freedom of expression among individuals. Globally the freedom of expression among individuals is protected as a result of the benefits that are associated with the application of freedom of expression.

Thus, freedom of expression is an important requisite in a liberal democratic state. The freedom of expression entails commercial forms of expression such as the use of spam (Spinello, 2006). Spam should therefore be protected as a commercial free speech. This is attributed to the fact that if the use of such spams are not protected various contents that can be considered as harmful may be consumed by individuals. This protection will therefore entail various forms of restrictions that will ensure that only credible form of information is consumed by the audience.

Various countries such as China and United States have engaged in some form of restriction of spam as a commercial free speech in order to take care of such contents such as pornography (Rooksby, 2007). However, there are enough reasons in relation to the fact that commercial expression should not be protected as a form of free speech among individuals. Commercial expressions in its essence do not promote truth as an essential aspect in free speech or freedom of expression. Furthermore, spams are not known to promote the beliefs or opinions of individuals in the freedom of expression.

Thus, the use of spam as a commercial expression should not be protection as it does not promote truth in its expression (Rooksby, 2007). Additionally, citizens of any particular state have a right in regards to freedom of expression. This right to liberty therefore guarantees an individual with a right to receive commercial information. Hence, in the preservation of freedom of expression among individuals it is important for commercial expression to be protected as it acts as important mode of transmission of free information to individuals (Spinello, 2006).

Conclusion To sum up, the protection of spam as a commercial free speech is essential in the contemporary world. The freedom of speech is an important aspect that should be protected among individuals. The use of spams is important in dissemination of information. The spam content should be protection in order to restrict the content of information that is conveyed in spams.ReferencesRooksby, E. (2007). The ethical Status of non-commercial Spam. Ethics and Information Technology. 9:141-152. Spinello, R. (2006). Ethical Reflections on the problem of spam.’ In I., Hinnman, ed.

Contemporary Moral issues Diversify and Consensus. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall, pp502-10.