Ethics Principles at the US Olympics Committee - Essay Example

Some of these members have self-serving interests and this compromised their integrity to fully constitute the ethics committee.

There was nothing wrong with Ward providing a letter of introduction if he was genuine and had interests in the organization at heart. However, the problem only arose when he sent an introduction letter on behalf of a friend. This indicates a conflict of interest where it can be seen that he wants to provide some favors to his friend. This is likely to compromise the integrity of the whole committee. Ward should not represent personal interests but should act professionally and impartially. The criteria for selection should be based on the experience and integrity of the company, not background information characterized by personal ties.

The CEO’s friend did nothing improper in this case. As long as they have the requisite experience to perform the task, they are also entitled to be considered for selection besides the fact that they know the CEO. As long as the principles of fairness and impartiality are taken into consideration, there is nothing wrong with the CEO’s friend being considered for the job.

The Ethics Oversight Committee did not operate effectively as far as their mandate was concerned. They acted in solidarity while at the same time blocking investigations that would have unearthed certain unethical practices taking place within the committee. The committee’s major role is to ensure that ethical practices are upheld every time not to take a leading role in concealing some of the ethical practices taking place within the organization.

The ethics committee is not doing a great job in trying to balance the ethical breaches and the interests of the organization. Under refusing to take part in the meeting that has been meant to resolve some of the issues that had emerged, it can be seen that the committee is not fully serving its purpose. This only created interest among other stakeholders since they believe that the organization is concealing something. If I was involved, I would order a full investigation of the allegations of ethical breaches. This is a sign of honest practice.

Congress does not need necessarily to weigh in heavily on the issue involving a nonprofit organization. They should just encourage the organization to uphold ethical principles in its operations. Interference of the congress will amount to the creation of conflicts of interests and this may further create a difficult situation that can make it problematic to run the organization. Such organizations should have their codes of professional conduct or ethics that significantly differ from the public service in terms of implementation (Lewis and Gilaman, 2012).

Indeed, a prominent organization like USOC should serve the public interest and maintain impartiality. In the first place, its existence is owed to the public hence it should serve the public interests. It should also be impartial since this is very important given that it is representing the interests of different stakeholders. Read More