Download file to see previous pages...
The two goals contradicted each other, as Vietnams had threatened to attack US if their troops were not to be withdrawn from South Vietnams. For that reason, Nixon addressed the issue with a two sided mind. Paradoxically, Nixon imparts a withdrawal mode to his audience, a strategy that makes them feel like he cares so much for the Americans, and especially the American men in Vietnam. He acknowledges that American troops stand a higher risk in the attacked zones but concludes the sentence by mentioning that withdrawing implies a greater risk to the natives of the attached zones. Nixon considers it wise to analyse the situation in two ways to make the audience understand that withdrawal, as the solution suggested earlier, is a controversial action that worsens the situation. As matter of fact, the Nixon understands that his audience are Americans, who would want their men protected but keeps in mind that the outside world is also watching his action. Therefore, the speech is planned not only to please the immediate audience but ensure that the problem is effectively addressed.
Nixon confidently convinces the audience that his speech is well advised, by mentioning that the decision being presented wasn’t his own opinion but an informed discussion with national Security Council, other crucial personnel as well as the president’s advisers. To ensure this confidence, the speech creates some sense of inductive reasoning, by first defining the problem, analysing the available solutions and drawing a generalised conclusion later on. Nixon explains the problem by describing the actions and motives of the enemy.
According to Nixon, America has no enmity whatsoever with North Vietnam, in the past there had been no troops moving to attack Vietnam, neither had the south Vietnams attacked their opponents before . He at the same time mentions the existence of alliance with South Vietnams. These create some sense of reasoning to the audience that
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
This, in modern times, has more often than not, been achieved not only through the work that an incumbent government may have done but also through the use of skilful oratory. Throughout history, in forms of government that have depended on some kind of support from the masses for survival, there has been a great amount of importance that has been given to oratory and in some cases, demagoguery.
Public speaking is about sharing ideas with the public, and getting thoughts and ideas into the open that may be controversial. It is about sharing an opinion, or research with others. Looking into the future, while public speaking may continue to change, the goals will remain the same.
On the other hand, the journals also provide good material but many of the journals contain historic or academic information about effective presentations and little practical information.
For example, Emanuel (2005) writes in the Community
But slowly, I learnt the art of mixing the native and foreign languages in my speech with extreme confidence and fluency. The switch between the languages whenever and whichever suits me during my speech, not only
This statement holds true since it requires a great deal of confidence and skill not just to speak in front of people, but to retain their attention throughout the period. This discourse looks at a recent career talk I attended at a local
Jack, personal communication, October 2, 2014). The other individual said that she sweats whenever such an opportunity presents itself. She went ahead to explain that she may develop a panic attack if she tries to address a public
As much as there are books and articles that supposed teach how to be a public speaker, theory without practice is ineffectual. Public speaking is like swimming where one has to get into the water to be a
Focusing on the negative expectations, one programs himself up for failure, what results in panics and loose of the control. Scientists have observed that the amount of the audience does not matter, but it is much more important how much orator is familiar with the audience.
I have noticed that there is more to nursing than the technical aspects; for example, there is need to understand the workplace culture, respect, rapport with patients and asking for support when needed. This paper will discuss some of the
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Public speaking for FREE!