Download file to see previous pages...
It is considered morally right when people make choices that conform to what is expected, which in turn leads to the correct consequences. On the other hand, when they make the wrong choice, the consequences are negative, therefore, they are considered acting in an immorally manner. This essay will examine the teleological moral systems in the society as well as how these moral systems help people to make the right choices. The paper will conclude by indicating how the teleological ethical system influences the society.
Teleological ethics is a theory of morality that originates its duties or moral obligation from what is deemed in the society as desirable or good as an end to be achieved. The teleological ethical system judges the penalties of the act rather than the act itself. In that, if the action results in what can be considered, as a good consequence, then it must be good as the results justify the reason the act was committed (Pollock, 2012). There are various teleological ethical systems in these theory and they include ethics of virtue, utilitarianism and ethics of care.
Consequentialism refers to the impression that the moral value of an action is resolute by the magnitude of its action. The precise consequences are those that are beneficial to humanity as they promote happiness, human satisfaction, human pleasure, and welfare to all humans. The consequences of doing something that is morally right are intrinsically valuable and good; hence, the actions that point to those consequences are ethical while those actions that lead away from happiness are immoral. For example, in the society we live in there are laws that have been imposed to ensure that people act in ways that ensure that they do not infringe on the happiness of other people. Therefore, different teleological moral systems are diverge not only on the exact consequences are, but on how different people poise the numerous possible consequences. In that, few choices are
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
This research aims to evaluate and present the four main challenges to the criminal justice system that are youth violence, drugs, violence against women and over-criminalization. Historical efforts to reduce youth violence worked and some are still effective for instance counseling and early detection.
Finally, in both systems, before a can be convicted of any crimes, there must be a proof of unreasonable doubt that the person committed the crimes or the delinquent acts (Harry & Dammer, 2010). There are numerous comparisons between the juvenile justice system and the adult criminal justice system. On the first note, the juvenile justice system is a characteristic of the criminal justice system.
However, the Systems Management infrastructure combines both, allowing for shifts to be made when one part might need to dominate in order to get the job done. In retrospect, the first two systems cannot function alone and attain success. The Systems Management infrastructure combines the best of both to provide the best-rounded style of management for all parts of the Justice System.
The system is not always fair when dealing with certain kinds of people. An example is the minority groups that constitute a large part of the state. Many at times when persecuted, they do not stand a free and fair trial. When we
As the report Legal and Ethical Issues declares the government has always been in dilemma on how to balance its power of enforcing criminal law against the rights of individuals because the law of criminal procedure faces various interferences, given that the United States is characterized with a high level of constitutional democracy.
Distributive justice has to do with the fair distribution of resources among all the different groups of citizens living in a community. Essentially, the distributing procedure, quantity of goods, and distribution pattern has to be seen to