A moral or ethical dilemma is generally a complex situation, which mostly involves apparent mental conflict that exists between moral imperatives in case one obeys would transgress the other. In simple terms, a moral dilemma generally involves having to choose between two…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
In stating about this problem, Russ Shafer-Landau argues that various moral principles tend to be effectively independently to how an individual perceives them.
Kant’s moral theory is slightly different especially how people perceive it. In defining moral dilemmas, the Kant moral theory is seen as deontological whereby a person’s actions are morally upright in terms of virtues of individual’s motives. In this case, they must derive from a certain duty than inclination (Timmons 27). The determination to act according to his/her duty mostly overcomes the self-interest evidence or the desire to do otherwise. Moreover, Kant argues the aspect of moral values of an individual’s actions with the fact that they only reside in maxim or formal principle. Alternatively, it explains about the general commitment of a person to engage in a certain act because it is his/her duty to do so (Timmons 35). This therefore means that, duty remains the necessity for a person to act out of vengeance for the law. Rigorous application of similar methods towards this reasoning would result in an equal success while dealing with moral philosophy problems. This therefore means that the eventual principle of morality must always be a moral law that happens abstractly and has the ability of guiding an individual towards a right action.
In as much as the Kant’s theory seems effective and applies to real life events, this theory of ethics has its own flaws and ineffectiveness when used literary (Timmons 32). Generally, the theory fails to tell people what they should do especially when their moral responsibilities are conflicting. Kant’s theory of ethics is entirely general especially on some of the common happening in terms of moral ethics and dilemmas. However, the theory is not detailed and effective enough to guide people on how to
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
If an organization’s leading moral principles could not distinguish between what is right and what is wrong or when values are in conflict, then it is in a situation called an ethical dilemma. However, most of the time, an ethical dilemma has no absolute answer because determining right and wrong is a subject matter of what the organization believes.
Somehow, health professionals must integrate their views on the patient's treatment with everyone else to provide care that best helps the patient while still abiding by the patient's wishes and requests, and they must do so within a profoundly secular world view.
However, such standards cannot be written to cover every possible situation. Moral principles can differ from and even directly conflict with the moral virtues of a specific practitioner in a specific situation, leading to personal moral dilemmas that can affect treatment decisions.
e trolley dilemma and the footbridge dilemma, and some of their variants were presented before the subjects and their responses were recorded along with an fMRI of their brain while they were answering these questions.
These two moral dilemmas elicit opposing responses
The author examines two perspectives of rational thinking: the Kantian rational thinking and the Utilitarian approach. He states that many of the principal decisions are of a moral nature. Morality is essential not only for the individual but also for society, because its very existence depends on the morality of its members.
The most crucial factor of a moral dilemma is therefore that the agent is required to carry out each of the two actions, the agent can carry out each of the actions, and the agent cannot perform both the actions. Therefore, the agent seems to be condemned to moral failure, no matter what he may do eventually, whatever he does, he would have failed to do something else right, or at the very least, fail at something that he ought to do.
That is why it would not be an exaggeration to suggest that Ethics reflects some of the most important aspects of the human nature. However, opponents of such idea suggest that morality is a rather relative manner; in other words, dilemmas that are being studied by the
This doctrine may be viewed from three broad dimensions. That is prevention, reaction, and rebuilding (World Federalist Movement, 2001). Prevention dimension is the most important element of the responsibility to protect.
From the findings of the study, 90% of the participants agree that the chances of having an ethical or moral dilemma with their patients are very high. Some who deal with serious patients such as chronic diseases claim that the moral dilemmas are an everyday issue and that they have learnt to understand their patients, the patients’ families.
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
with a personal 20% discount.