Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/social-science/1648829-moral-dilemmas
https://studentshare.org/social-science/1648829-moral-dilemmas.
All the options, in this case, are mostly unpleasant. Weston’s definition of such ethics has no definite reference to reason (Timmons 12). However, he feels it is a concern that has legitimate expectations and basic needs for others and for us.
On the other hand, Shafer-Landau's description of the aspect of moral realism entails a system, magic defense, of ideas, which tend to have objective moral standards. In stating this problem, Russ Shafer-Landau argues that various moral principles tend to be effectively independent of how an individual press them. Kant’s moral tShafer-Landau's'shtly different, especially in how people perceive it. In defining moral dilemmas, Kant's moral theory is seen as deontological whereby a person’s actions are morally upright in terms of virtues of the individual’s motives.
In this case, they must derive from a certain duty than inclination (Timmons 27). The determination to act according to his/her duty mostly overcomes the self-interest evidence or the desire to do otherwise. Moreover, Kant argues the aspect of moral values of an individual’s actions with the fact that they only reside in maxim or formal principle. Alternatively, it explains the general commitment of a person to engage in a certain act because it is his/her duty to do so (Timmons 35). This, therefore, means that the duty remains the necessity for a person to act out of vengeance for the law.
Rigorous application of similar methods towards this reasoning would result in equal success while dealing with moral philosophy problems. This, therefore, means that the eventual principle of morality must always be a moral law that happens abstractly and can guide an individual toward the right action. In as much as Kant’s theory seems effective and applies to real-life nts, this theory of ethics has its own flaws and ineffectiveness when used literary (Timmons 32).
Generally, the theory fails to tell people what they should do especially when their moral responsibilities are conflicting. Kant’s theory of ethics is entirely general, especially on some of the common happening in terms of moral ethics and dilemmas. How the theory is not detailed and effective enough to guide people on how to deal with their moral conflicts (Timmons 42). In doing my service project, there were areas in the project, which were generally challenging and complex. I was unable to progress despite the extensive research on the project.
Therefore, I felt that the best way to complete the service project was through cheating. However, in my mind, I was trying very hard to fight this moral conflict. Cheating to attain certain results is wrong (Timmons 46). Resolving this conflict in the future will be easy, especially with extended practice and research.
Read More