Analysis of Communication Models - Assignment Example

Analysis of Communication ModelsFirst Page of Part 2 Communication models have been created to “analyse graphically and show the interrelationship between the major components of the communication process” (Hoffman, Farrell, Lilford, Ellis & Cant, 2007, p. 330). Communication models are constantly evolving. Presented below is the convergence model by Field (1979). Figure 1. Model for Successful Communication (Hoffman et al, 2007, p. 333) According to this model, the sender encodes a message which is decoded by the receiver.

When the receiver has interpreted the message, s/he then encodes a feedback to the sender. This model shows that in the communication process, sender and receiver continuously exchange roles. In a basic linear model of communication, “sender --- message --- receiver” diagram is sufficient, and the feedback process can be taken as a representation of the linear model. Below is a table presenting the different elements in a standard communication model and how they are referred to in other proposed models.Table 1. Elements of Communication ModelElementsAlternative NamesDefinitionSenderSource/ EncoderThe person (s) who delivers/ encodes the message.

MessageIssueThis refers to what is transmitted or encoded by the sender.ChannelCommunicationThe manner that the message was delivered (i.e. speaking, written, signs).ReceiverDecoderThe person who receives/ decodes/ accepts the message.Extra Paper Relationships, in general, and romantic relationships, in particular, are perhaps one of the most perplexing among the systems involving human social interactions. It is not surprising that 50 percent of conversations in this lifetime circulate around the most mysterious system among human social interactions.

The 90’s saw an advent of increased interest in the scientific study of relationships. “It is clear that all matters concerning relationships between women and men are of paramount interest to scholars and are clearly in the center stage of the public’s focus” (Kalbfleisch & Cody, 1995, p. 4). Nurturing heterosexual relationships at various levels therefore, is increasingly becoming a concern among sociologists and psychologists. This is born out of the advocacy to create equality between men and women, and to improve the quality of female/male relationships and human relationships in general (Kalbfleisch & Cody, 1995).

Research has shown that males and females differ in their approaches to relationships. One of the differences highlighted in most books is in the manner of communication. Communication scholars have a lot to say about relationship maintenance. “The end of relationships occurs when people stop communicating” (Dindia, 2003, p. 1). Experts agree that the stages in communication determine the progression of relationships from a superficial to a deeper level. Dindia (2003) further emphasize that “the quality of a relationship is primarily determined by the quality of the communication in the relationship” (p. 1). Personal experience has motivated the writer of this paper to indulge in this research.

A failed relationship led him to proactively seek answers to build successful relationships with a partner. The paper outlines the different levels of communication that couples go through in the process of building strong and deep relationships. The primary text used in this paper is the book Together: Communicating Interpersonally by Steweart and Logan. Research studies are also highlighted to back-up the theories from the book.References:Dindia, K. (2003). Definitions and perspectives on relational maintenance communication. In D.J.

Canary & M. Dainton (Eds), Maintaining relationships through communication: relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 31-50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc.Hoffman, E., Farrell, D., Lilford, N., Ellis, M., & Cant, M. (2007). Operations and management principles for contact centres. Capetown, South Africa: Juta & Co.Kalbfleisch, P.J. & Cody, M.J. (1995). Power and communication in the relationships of men and women. In P.J. Kalbfleisch & M.J. Cody, Gender, power, and communication in human relationships (pp. 3-26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc.