Nobody downloaded yet

Animal Rights: Is It Morally Wrong to Eat Meat - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Current essay investigates the ethical issues of using animals as a public property and particularly eating them. The writer claims that one could come to the conclusion that animals are as capable of suffering from pain and feeling pleasure as other human beings…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.5% of users find it useful
Animal Rights: Is It Morally Wrong to Eat Meat
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Animal Rights: Is It Morally Wrong to Eat Meat"

Download file to see previous pages The human beings have a higher value as compared to animals on account of their potential and abilities and the quality of life that they lead. However, he accepts that equal pain and suffering is also suffered by animals. In Tom Regan's case for animal rights, he speaks about how animals have moral rights and if due respect is given to human beings who are not rational, such as infants or mentally challenged people, then animals should not be deprived of this right just because they cannot make rational decisions for themselves.
Utilitarianism views state that the moral worth of an action can be judged only by how it contributes to overall utility or satisfaction, that is, the outcome of an action will decide its worth. With regard to animal rights, Peter Singer and R.G.Frey were act- utilitarian. Going back to the Classical utilitarianism, Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) believed that pleasure and suffering are equal and those who suffer or experience pleasure should also be treated as equals. John Stuart Mill's (1806-1873) views stood up to the fact that beings which are capable of getting higher pleasures should be preferred over beings that are capable of getting lower pleasures. But is it really justifiable to kill beings for food just because they lack in some abilities or are incapable of leading a higher quality of life
According to Singer, animals were to be given the same considerations as human beings on account on their capability to feel the pleasure of pain. His views stated that moral considerations are even given to human beings who are irrational and unsound, then animals deserve moral considerations from human beings too. He argued against speciesism; animals should not be discriminated against just because they belong to another class of species. He did not believe in equal rights, as animals can not have the right they cannot use, like the right of voting.
These views were also supported by Tom Regan to an extent in later years who stated that animals have equal inherent value to humans and should not be discriminated against on grounds of speciesism. He said that inherent value belongs to everyone who is experiencing the subject of life. It is unjustifiable that we use evil means to achieve a greater good or to increase total utility.  ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Animal Rights: Is It Morally Wrong to Eat Meat Essay”, n.d.)
Animal Rights: Is It Morally Wrong to Eat Meat Essay. Retrieved from
(Animal Rights: Is It Morally Wrong to Eat Meat Essay)
Animal Rights: Is It Morally Wrong to Eat Meat Essay.
“Animal Rights: Is It Morally Wrong to Eat Meat Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Animal Rights: Is It Morally Wrong to Eat Meat

Animal rights

...?Animals Rights Since inception, a common perception prevailed that believed in “dominion over the fish of the sea, over the fowl of the air, over the cattle and over all the world and over every creeping thing that creped upon the earth” [1]. However the man kind started treating the animals as their property in many ways. The man kind was never entitled to use animals for entertainment purposes to say the least. Realization has been around in this regard and throughout centuries people have raised voice for animals rights The first instance in this regard was noticed in 1635 when a legislation was brought to forefront that opposed use of sheep fur for wool making [2].The British Philosopher John Locke gave idea of animal rights... , and no...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Animal Rights

...strong arguments regarding the morality of animals which should be taken into view to grant them the rights. It has been seen that many organizations have been formed all over the world to serve this purpose. References Animal Equality Plous, S. (January 01, 1996). Attitudes Toward the Use of Animals in Psychological Research and Education: Results From a National Survey of Psychologists. The American Psychologist, 51, 11, 1167. Animal rights rights and wrongs. Jennie Erin Smith 2010.The Sunday Times....
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Animal Rights affect a positive change on animal rights worldwide. As such, as rationally and scientifically as possible, this analysis will work to lay out a moderate framework from which the author will attempt to explain and understand the relevant arguments that exist on both sides of this debate. The following provides a brief summary of some of the arguments that each side of this debate put forward: The individuals who campaign for a greater degree of protection and animal rights argue the following: Due to the fact that eating meat necessarily entails the slaughter of an animal, it also entails grief, anxiety, and a high...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Animal Rights

...of this the development of the concept of animal right in England. Though he supports man’s practice of eating meat, he appreciated the idea of animal right: “awakening more and more to a sense that beasts have rights, in proportion as the strange notion is being gradually overcome and outgrown, that the animal kingdom came into existence solely for the benefit and pleasure of man.” (Phelps, 2007, p. 23) Referring to the animal right movement in England, he further says, “To the honor, then, of the English, be it said that they are the first people who have, in downright...
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper

Animal Rights

...? Question Human ethical attitudes and practices with respect to the non-human animals exhibit an inquisitive instability. On the other hand, several people believe that it is unethical and wrong to inflict anguish and death on an animal for an inconsequential reason. Torturing a cat or setting it on the fire by the way of childish prank is one of the key examples of wrongdoing in the literature of philosophy. It is true that all breathing animals have morale rights like human beings. They breathe and live like us. Most importantly God created the animals. Therefore, it can be stated that non-human...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Animal Rights

...number: Day-to-day survival with plants and animals There are many people in the United s with varying views concerning animal rights. Some of them believe that we have moral or ethical responsibilities towards animals, leaving us the suggestion that we should leave away a nation of meat eaters and shift to vegetarianism. Concerning this point, various philosophical considerations surface in order to convince the public that we have indeed moral or ethical responsibilities towards animals. Arguments are therefore essential in this case and it is the primary purpose of the work at hand to critically...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Pet owners who eat meat

...HIV/AIDS has attracted serious debates and concerns all over the world. Due to the nature of the disease, and how some people get affected innocently, affected; Arizona opted to pass law that would incriminate HIV transmission to another partner. This bill that was to passed into law had a number of implication. The law attracted many ethical questions as to whether is right to send one into prision due to their health status; though this is not the major concern. The law is intended to prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS. This law come to the aid of those people who get infected by the infected people purposefully. A concern in regards to this issue comes with a thought provocation as to whether the law shall help in...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

Meat Eating - a Necessary Evil

... of due: Meat eating, a necessary evil. To consume meat or not to consume meat; this statement has been a debatable topic for as long as I can remember. Vegetarians have for a long time claimed that meat eating is “murder” since animals are slaughtered in a huge number to feed the world population with meat. Animal rights activists are not necessarily against meat eating but cruelty towards animals. According to (Sims, 5), ethics can simply be defined as the systemic reflection on the moral aspect of life and it’s conflicts. The question if it is ethical or unethical to eat meat has become a personal matter. The most fundamental issue on dietary ethics is that, for most people residing in the developed world, meat eating... is not...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Should people eat dog meat or not

...and be more numerous, or it is even better if they are international ones, moreover, there is inspiring news about Chinese activists who are saving dogs from execution which is getting to be a rule more than exception. Materials, based on the evidence of honored and respected sources, should be widespread and should provide with some precise information about the influence of dog eating on people; to propose some substitutes, to organize more experiments and to invite people consuming such meat to participate, having as its aim, awakening of consciousness; to work on creation laws for the animal rights in such countries like China; to do more research of the issue for...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

The Problem with Eating Animals

...environment. It is therefore not wrong to eat meat since the order is still maintained-it is ethical. Humans do eat meat out of necessity and not pleasure therefore this is morally accepted. This is a self-preservation mechanism which is meant to preserve life. Just like shooting someone in self-defense is not the same as killing someone for sadistic reason therefore in the same way killing animals for our survival when we have no other choice is okay. Although we have plants that have high protein content such as beans and peas, it is justifiable to eat animal meat...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Animal Rights: Is It Morally Wrong to Eat Meat for FREE!

Contact Us