Humane Society: No Kill Shelters - Essay Example

This paper declares that a municipal shelter is run by a country, city, or by a general public entity. It is funded by the taxpayers. The employees of such shelters are civil servants who might not have any experience working with animals. Such shelters fall under the sponsorship of the government for example streets and road maintenance. Their basic job is defined in municipal codes, which means to pick up wandering and irritant animals and then reunite them with their owners. Though, some municipal shelters do a fine job of bringing back together the animals with their proprietors and even finding homes for their wanderings, but most of these shelters do a poor job in this spot.

It is decided that many municipal shelters do not have permission to do much more than reunite or slay, but even here many shelters are unsuccessful to assemble the smallest amount of standards. This essay explores that a shelter managed by the streets and hygiene area may come under the purview of a branch head who knows much about road maintenance but not a lot about caring for animals. These shelters might consist of employees that are associates and relatives of political appointees. Such people may have no backdrop in the care of animals and no sense of responsibility to the animals.

If truth be told, several of these shelters see the work occupied in sheltering animals as a pain to be minimized through killing as many animals as probable and as quickly as possible. Many shelters are where animals are slaughtered because of a believed lack of space when, in fact, all the cages are empty. Certainly, it takes a lot more work to uphold cages full of animals than to keep them unfilled. In contrast, a private shelter is funded by private donations and provides a safe home for lost and misplaced animals.

Their basic task is to find a home for such animals. Employees of these shelters are volunteers who are at least a bit knowledgeable about caring for such animals. Many of the private shelters do wonderful work of placing animals. However, they frequently kill those animals that are hard to find homes for. This contains animals that have constant but treatable health circumstances, for example, diabetes, or disabilities that are not life-threatening or are supposed to be unwanted. In addition, a lot of private shelters still keep their animals in cages that are not considered for the long-lasting care of animals that can never get home.

Some of the shelters refer to themselves as "no-kill." No Kill is a widespread movement for animal shelter improvement. It is advocated by Winograd with a simple policy of not euthanizing animals. Such kinds of policies are known as "no-kill." The phrase No Kill is distinct by practices whereby no animal has killed for any other reason such as to ease the suffering of the animal, or the animal is violent, unmanageable, the animal is sick, handicapped, or unappealing, or it has some behavioral issues.

However, animals are not killed just because there isn't enough space at the shelter. Such shelters will generally, save more than 90 percent of the animals. Through this system of No Kill, Winograd has proved that this procedure is within reach for both private and public shelters for every animal. (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2008).