Finding Darwin's God - Assignment Example

of the of the Topic: Critical Analysis of “Finding Darwins God -a scientists search for common ground between god and evolution” Argument 1: Kenneth Miller, without doubt is trying to successfully explain the compatibility that exists between the theory of quantum physics and Darwin’s God. Right from the beginning, Miller preserves his belief that God’s creation is present in Universe at the same time the logical perception of scientists in terms of biological evolution too has its hold. However, the compatibility he explains is that in every happening God’s control is exhibited thus resulting in unpredictable things. In other words, Miller holds the point that thought scientist might explain their understanding of the Universe in terms of the quantum physics theories; however, every theory has its influence from the supreme creator called God. Quantum theory of physics observes the Universe as a combination of smallest or discreet parts such as atoms, nuclei, and sub nuclear parts. Miller observes that these discreet particles when combined in a random fashion might have chances to result in unpredictable happenings in the world. In other words, the microscopic particles identified by quantum physics would combine to end up in macroscopic events; this unpredictability, Miller calls as the central property of matter. On the other hand, God, who created innumerable things in the same way like the combination of discreet particles influence the world with unpredictable events. Miller’s argument tries to build a strong logical compatibility between the quantum theory, the evolution made by God, in terms of unpredictability, Miller seems to have maintained an acceptable logical statement that science, and religion has unpredictable things in common. This could be understood in with the help of many events, which has happened in the course of years. If the scientists could consider the first report of Tsunami, Katherina and various tremors occurrences as unpredicatable, then the same could also be argued in terms of some supernatural influence holding the earth. In this sense, Miller wins his argument. Argument 2: Miller observes that creationists have the belief that natural science ends up with supernatural conclusions, but he differentiates religion and natural science clearly. There exists meaning for every thing made by God and hence his creation holds his identity, so there is nothing-logical present in evolution and thus they believe that there is God argues creationists where as evolutionists argue that there is logical reasoning for every thing in the world. Miller refers to many scientists and theorist as creationists in order to support his discourse. For instance the “irreducibly complex “ molecular structures in which Michael Behe tries to find a structure, which was absolutely a complex state of existence made of simple things. Miller seems to identify some specific function with each smaller component of the complex molecular structure. Miller tries to make a balance by arguing that life has a meaning in its origin, hence there would be definitely a planning behind a simple or complex thing in the world, so he come to the conclusion that evolution and the creation of God has its deep relationship. Miller also explains his statement with the functioning of a type of bacteria. If the mechanism has been removed form it then the same bacteria has optional chances to have link with another DNA and proceed, thus by saying this Miler tries to stress on the point that biological evolution also has a logical function but it is related to natural science. Hence, he offends Morris who looks at evolution as an interpretative framework, which could be achieved only by faith. Miller’s creationists points of view is that evolution is contingent process determined by God, natural science should not be considered as non existence of God, if scientist say like this then Miller complains that it might be the scientists own individual views. In this aspect Miller is surely trying to blend the process of evolution as one guided by the instructions of God. Argument 3: Miller tries to explain his understanding of religion with the uncertainty or unpredictability principle, in every aspect of his theory he seems to have concentrated more on a debate-oriented presentation of beliefs over God’s evolution and natural science. However, at the same time he has failed to implicate his belief over the presence of God in the process of evolution with strong illustrations or explanations, rather Miller has considered the unpredictability as his weapon to support his compatibility argument. While explicating the ideas behind DNA mechanisms or the quantum physics theory Miller defends his point of view regarding randomness of functioning. At the same time, he stresses on the point that every event that happens in a random fashion has been guided by the supernatural power called God. Even while explaining the fundamental property of matter Miller tries to bring in a link between religion and evolution. Thus almost in all his views Miller seems to organise a balance between evolution and natural science linked with the influence of God. In this aspect Miller appears to share his Judeo –Christian faith that is everything comes from a single supreme power called God. As far as the loving concept of God is concerned, there seems to be more scientific proves rather than religious, for example Miller’s concept of unpredictability leads to a threatening aspect of evolution by God rather than a loving aspect. Overall, Miller has taken the opportunity of writing this book to maintain a balance between religion and science without giving exact explanations on his belief in God’s presence in every event happening in the world. Miller tries to explain his understanding of religion with the uncertainty or unpredictability principle, in every aspect of his theory he seems to have concentrated more on a debate-oriented presentation of beliefs over God’s evolution and natural science. However, at the same time he has failed to implicate his belief over the presence of God in the process of evolution with strong illustrations or explanations, rather Miller has considered the unpredictability as his weapon to support his compatibility argument. While explicating the ideas behind DNA mechanisms or the quantum physics theory Miller defends his point of view regarding randomness of functioning. At the same time, he stresses on the point that every event that happens in a random fashion has been guided by the supernatural power called God. Even while explaining the fundamental property of matter Miller tries to bring in a link between religion and evolution. Thus almost in all his views Miller seems to organise a balance between evolution and natural science linked with the influence of God. In this aspect Miller appears to share his Judeo –Christian faith that is everything comes from a single supreme power called God. As far as the loving concept of God is concerned, there seems to be more scientific proves rather than religious, for example Miller’s concept of unpredictability leads to a threatening aspect of evolution by God rather than a loving aspect. Overall, Miller has taken the opportunity of writing this book to maintain a balance between religion and science without giving exact explanations on his belief in God’s presence in every event happening in the world. Read More