Ethical Dilemmas - Assignment Example

Ethical dilemmas Ethical dilemma has been described by Pollock as a composite situation that frequently involves a seeminglymental disagreement between moral duties in which obeisance to one would lead to violation of the other. Confidentiality is one of the most common ethical dilemmas that affect organizations. Confidentiality in this case refers to the ability of an individual to conceal information. As a psychologist, I am required to maintain confidentiality and privacy of the information that may have been obtained through any means or media.

As a psychologist I should have it in mind that the confidentiality and privacy of such information may be limited by law or developed by institutional laws (Pollock, 2011).As a psychologist, I am required to discuss the relevant restrictions of confidentiality and the predictable use of the information that can be generated from the psychology processes. This discussion will involve me, other psychologists and individuals (Pollock, 2011). As a psychologist who offers these services via the internet, I am also supposed to warn and alert the clients of the risks for privacy and limiting confidentiality.

A psychologist can only disclose the information on consent of the individual or the organization. For credibility of the police psychologist, I will be required to obtain informed consent, determine and know who the client is and maintain confidences. Problem may arise in confidentiality when the relation between the client and the psychologist, I, may be unclear.Competence is another ethical dilemma that the psychologists in the police force face. Competence refers to the ability to accomplish a given task or obligation intellectually and physically.

In this context, as a psychologist, I will require competence to be able to tackle some of the problems and confidentiality professionally (Gelber, 2003). As a psychologist, I will be required to be well qualified. In order to maintain objectivity, a psychologist is required to avoid using or delegating tasks to the individuals who might have conflicting interests or may have multiple relationships with the clients served. This would lead to exploitation of the objectivity. The obligations of an individual are anticipated to perform competently on the grounds of their training, education, experience or with the level of monitoring present which.

Dual relationships, role conflicts and boundary issues are other ethical dilemmas I as a psychologist will face. As a psychologist, I should take all initiatives to avoid causing harm to their clients or patients, students or supervisors and organizations. Such initiatives should aim to reduce these dangers where predictable and reduce their impacts where ineluctable. A psychologist may find himself or herself in a situation where he or she is in a multiple relationship with an individual, first as a psychologist and second through blood relation or may assure the client or individual of a future relationship with him or her.

I should take measures to avoid such situations as they will damage the psychologist objectivity and may also impair his or her competence. According to Gelber (2003), though the conventional Psychology professional ethics code admonishes dual relationship, present day alterations have noticed the need for the psychologists to work with both the police and the managers.As a police psychologist, I can find myself entangled in conflicting interests. I thus should try to avert such situations where scientific, personal, and legal and professional could be anticipated to harm the objectivity and competence (Janik, 1994).

As a psychologist, dual relationship will help me provide better services to the clients through collaboration with other professionals.A situation may happen where as a police psychologist, while going through the lists of all the people I retrieved information from, I realize that one of them is a family member. This will present me with the challenge of whether to reveal all the information retrieved or to conceal the information. Such a situation shows that there is some conflict of interests and as a psychologist I should try by all means to shun such a situation and delegate the work to another qualified psychologist since this will hamper my objectivity (Janik, 1994).

ReferencesGelber, C. (2003). LAPD bureau psychologist hit the streets. Research and Practice, 40(1). Janik, J. J. (1994). Desirable Qualifications in a police psychologist. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 10(2), 24-31. Pollock, J. M. (2011). Ethical Dilemmas and Decisions in Criminal Justice. (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.