Analysis of a Personality - Research Paper Example

? Analysis of a Personality Individual personality involves a variety of seemingly long term characters. Many psychologists take the importance to describe personality by comparing people beside five extensive magnitudes. These magnitudes include: a proneness to nervousness beside with agony, craving for social association and encouragement, an altruistic worry for others, an interest to fresh experiences and lastly a predisposition to become consistent, disciplined and determined. An example to apply is Carl Jung who is a Swedish born psychiatric specialist, he introduced an important hypothesis of personality in the field of psychology. He also developed a self-governing theory of personality. Carl both parents came from a religious background, his dad being a Swiss transformed evangelical minister, while his mum was a complete protestant minister. Consequently, religious influences circulated all the way through the existence of Carl since childhood to present. All these surrounding religious influences that existed in Carl’s life were fundamental especially in connection with the development of his theory of personality. Carl was evaluated to be an exceptionally intrusive individual all through his babyhood, as well as, premature adulthood. Carl as a young adult, hunted out his dad’s counsel on diverse religious questions, moreover he established that his dad once in a blue moon gave him fitting answers. Carl claimed that this displeasure of not obtaining proper counsel resulted in a diverse detachment between him and his dad, on the other hand, Carl’s connection with his dad does emerge to have predisposed Carl’s afterward expansion of his personality theory. Whilst, dazzling upon his deliberations with his dad, he argued that his dad admitted his religion because of exclusively believing on faith, although he never in point of fact had a religious experience that really touched him expressively. Consequently, religion was a major element of Carl’s theory and was articulated in the form of religion that did stroke people in an arousing manner (Clifford, 2005). Carl did not articulate to feel a requirement to consider the dissimilarity between churches, nor did Carl appear to feel obliged to pledge to a single religion. Carl obtained his recognized education from the University of Basel, where he studied natural sciences and later studied medicine. At the same time as he is in the university, Carl came across a book on psychiatry by Dr Richard von Krafft Ebing, from the book became also one of the turning points of Carl to come to a decision to penetrate into the profession of psychiatry. During the year 1909, Carl started his own practice that enabled him to travel across the universe. To be able to appreciate life, especially the personality theory created by Carl, it is vital to comprehend the period in which he existed. Carl existed through a fundamental deal of great relevance in the universe history. He experienced the World War I and even World War II. This made him come across a broad human emotion in his existence in this world, with his extinguished education, as well as, period in which he existed is a precise reflection of his theory of personality. During the begging of Carl’s profession as a psychiatrist, the duties of Sigmund came to be relatively significant. A relation between Carl and Freud started when Carl openly supported Freud’s psychiatric therapy. Freud was significantly impressed with Carl due to his shore up to his psychiatric therapy and came into conclusion that he was to be his successor. Later during a trip to America all together, Carl started to doubt the Freud’s emphasis on sexual motivation which was a vital issue in his theory of psychoanalysis. What Carl considered was that Freud’s theory might be without doubt accepted by American audiences if sexual enthusiasm was not a fundamental issue in Freud’s theory of psychiatric therapy. Carl’s thoughts and his final theory was a hold up on Freud’s work, and later posed certain views which contrasted with Freud’s ideas. Carl came up with a complete theory of personality; he acknowledged three mechanisms of the personality (Aziz, 2007). The original module was ego, this involves someone’s conscious. In view of the fact that Carl and Freud contained a tight relationship at a certain period of time, the perception of ego portrayed by Freud is comparable to Carl’s self belief of the ego. Essentially, the ego is what an individual thinks remembers, as well as, perceives. In an understandable personal connection beside with research studies of the coexisting clinical, as well as, family situation of each one that Freud alongside with Carl were connected together in component by unsettled personal requirements. Freud’s thoughts on male cherishment in relation to whom he could fool around to his necessitate for a change, at the same time as Carl’s thought of an idea liable dad figure in the direction of whom he could express his prevailing ambitious vigor. These individual requirements sooner or later portrayed in the relationship, as Carl took on an enlarged independence, as well as, a distinctive influence of his personal concerns and later Freud evaluated this enlargement as Oedipal (Ernest & Marcus, 1963). Subsequent to their separation, each person would portray the other as a victim to an evaluated phobic need. Concurrent to Carl’s perspective on personality, one can compare it with psychoanalytic perspective which contains similar principles as those evaluated in Carl’s life experience. The psychology in an individual personality should spot on considering the rational processes, particularly the insensible height of a person’s mind. The psychoanalytic perspective also recognizes the ego momentum in an individual. This is because the unconscious mind is thought to be vital in someone’s personality. These perspectives argue that a person's behavior may be at the end of the day provoked by two instinctual drives, this includes: sexual and aggressive. Carl’s concept of the sexual drive expands outside sexual concerns and associates something that may be enjoyable to a personality. The other perspective is the humanistic perspective, this cropped out of a variety of psychologists expanding dissatisfaction with the behaviorist along with psychoanalytic theories. This can be compared to Carl’s dissatisfaction altitude with his dad’s lack of answering his questions, and later became the turning point of Carl’s concentration on psychiatric profession. This perspective argues that human beings should be completely free to select their behaviors, as well as, emotional responses to events surrounding them. This argument is similar to Carl’s parent’s religion selection and controlled by the unconscious of the religion forces. Due to Carl’s belief in individual actualization, the humanistic perspective tends to evaluate humans as excellent by nature, this does not mean that they refer human do excellent things, but humans have the predisposition to succeed in transforming themselves along with their environment. The perspective and that of Carl’s perspective evaluate humans as rational animals who are free to select their belief and action (Andrew, 1985). References Andrew, S. (1985). Jung and the Post-Jungians. NY: Routledge press. Aziz, R. (2007). The untrodden Path beyond Freud and Jung. NY: The State University of New York Press. Clifford, M. (2005). Jung and education; elements of an archetypal pedagogy. London: Rowman & Littlefield press. Ernest, J. & Marcus, S. (1963). The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud, New York: Anchor Books. Read More