Women in Psychology: Karen Horney - Research Paper Example

She was born in September 1885 in Germany with a strong passion to study human behavior; thus, her affiliation to the psychological field (Hitchcock, 2004). Karen was equally known as Danielson who was remembered as one of the foremost women to enter a German University to study medicine. Whilst pursuing her studies, she met a lawyer known as Oska Horney whom she married consequently in 1909. It is further evident that Horney got two children from the union; however, it was characterized by sad episodes.

As such, she embraced psychoanalytic tendencies to help her address the issues emanating from her marriage. Indeed, it was a sad state for an upcoming scientist to experience such setbacks. Consequently, she began engaging in hospital work alongside psychoanalytic processes as at Berlin Psychoanalytic Institute (Hitchcock, 2004). Her contribution to psychological processes began at an early age as evident in her design of a social program at the institute; furthermore, she taught students in the field and engaged in diverse research processers.

It is equally clear that her role in sexual development is recognizable within the broader society. This is evident in her assertions that the route of penis envy was the manner that parents, as opposed to the broader societal processes, treated women. As such, Horney’s background contributed to the improvements that she initiated in the psychological setting. Theoretical perspective Horney’s perspective is largely evident in the attachment theories, which describe an individual’s capacity to adapt to changes within his course of living.

It is interesting that her background especially her tumultuous background played a noteworthy role in devising the attachment theory together with other psychologists (Berger, 1994). Horney often describes the distorted functional processes of neurotic tendencies, which are often evident amidst the adults. This aids in the creation of a psychoanalytic viewpoint that facilitates the comprehension of the affiliation between adults and children. It is fundamental to acknowledge that Horney’s works are hugely dependent on the attachment theory; thus, the capacity to deduce the relations between a mother and a child.

It is equally apparent that Horney significantly departs from other psychologists especially in issues pertaining to theoretical viewpoint and the population that aids in studying the behavior of persons. Furthermore, other areas of divergence that distinguish Horney and other psychologists include methodology used and the segment of lifecycle that constitutes their focus. It is clear that Horney’s theoretical perspective is hugely dependent on the capacity to demystify behavioral tendencies, which are apparent amidst women and the broader populace.

Furthermore, the quality of personal perception concerning the behavioral tendencies that an individual exudes equally typifies her ideologies (Berger, 1994). It is fundamental to agree that Horney’s theoretical perspectives have either been debatable over time through research or accepted and scrutinized further. This postulates that such ideologies contributed significantly to the understanding of human tendencies and behavior. Contribution Horney’s contribution are largely evident amidst women especially her capacity to demystify their sexuality and personality attributes.

This is seen in her presentation of a paper at an international conference concerning women affairs. It is equally clear that Horney analyzed Freud, who was a renowned psychologist by indicating that his understanding of women was limited to behavioral processes. However, issues pertaining to the society that determines the cultural ideals equally contributed to women’