Nobody downloaded yet

Applied Econometrics - Assignment Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
In the second variant, a 1 percent change in RM causes a 0.0306 % change in the median housing price (MV). Eventually, a 1 percent changes in RM causes a 0.294 % change in the…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.6% of users find it useful
Applied Econometrics
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Applied Econometrics"

Download file to see previous pages causes a reduction of median housing price by 0.028 in the first variant, a reduction of 0.027 in the second variant, and a reduction of 0.027 in the third variant.
In the third variable, nitrogen oxide concentrations in parts per hundred million (NOX), the coefficients are 1.479 and 1.529 in the second and third variants respectively. These figures suggest that 1 percent change in nitrogen oxide concentration increases the medium housing price by 1.479 in the second variant and by 1.529 in the third variant.
Beta coefficient is the measure of the sensitivity of the estimates in influencing the median housing price. In the estimates, the beta coefficient is the slope of the model summarized into β0, β1, β4, β3, and β2.
Normally, the coefficients would imply 1 percentage change in the estimate 1 and 2 would cause an increase of 0.566 and 0.0261. However, using the beta approach, the two coefficients are below, suggesting that they are below the median housing price.
6. Suppose in model (3) I added in the variable NOX DCHAS, resulting in ln(MVi) = β0 + β1RMi + β2 ln(DISi) +β3NOXi + β4DCHAS;i + β5 NOX DCHAS +Ɛi . How would the interpretation of Ɛ3 change in model (3) after the inclusion of this variable? What is the interpretation of Ɛ5 in this model?
9. Given that the BP and White tests yield the same conclusion regarding the presence of heteroskedasticity, does this imply that the BP test is as good as the White test? Explain your reasoning in detail.
Heteroskedasticity implies to the circumstance when the variability of a variable is unequal across the range of values of a second variable that predicts it. In this circumstance, it means that the Bp test is as good as the white test since in the presence of heteroskedasticity, it is expected to be different for variability, which is not the case.
Heteroskedasticity does not necessarily imply an error, but only imply variableness, i.e. variability of a variable is unequal across the range of ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Applied Econometrics Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1”, n.d.)
Applied Econometrics Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1. Retrieved from
(Applied Econometrics Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words - 1)
Applied Econometrics Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words - 1.
“Applied Econometrics Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words - 1”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
...?Econometrics Regression Model Question A The other hypothesis to be investigated by this regression was weather the level of education of women had an impact on their level of availability or participation in the work place. This was to be monitored using the coefficient educ. The availability and increase of other sources of income for the family was also considered to find out weather the same affected their level of commitment at work. This was done using the variable nwifeinc. The estimated coefficients had the signs as expected and were of statistical significance, this was demonstrated clearly buy the patterns displayed by the respective graphs of the variable coefficients. It therefore demonstrated beyond any...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment
Applied Econometrics Project--------Exchange rates and commodity price:the case of America Agriculture exports
...? Estimating the marginal propensity to consume and interest dependence of consumption in the uk Vs the US project prepared within the EC3064 module Applied Econometric Project Date of Submission: {Enter the date here in the format DD/MM/2011} If appropriate, enter any acknowledgement or disclaimer here; OTHERWISE DELETE executive summary Marginal propensity to consume can be defined as the incremental change in consumption that results from a change in income. This paper explores the marginal propensities to consume in the US and UK economies. Essentially, the validity of the Keynesian theory of consumption is the focal point. A review of the fundamentals of Keynesian consumption theory is conducted and...
28 Pages(7000 words)Dissertation
Econometrics the dependent variable are explained by changes in the independent variables. Including an insignificant variable as one of the independent variables may minimize the effects of the actual variable causing the variation in the independent variable. Like in the example above, if truly age is not a determinant of income as stated in equation 1, then including it like in equations 2 and 3 will minimize the actual effects of education on income. BIBLIOGRAPHY Greene W. H. (2003). Econometric Analysis. Fifth Edition. Prentice Hall. Pearson Education International. Anderson D. R., Sweeney D. J., Williams T. A. (2005). Statistics for Business and Economics. Ninth Edition. Thomson...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
...ECONOMETRICS PART Question a) From table the correlation coefficient between health status and years of education is 0.33. When the correlation coefficient in absolute values is between 0.1 and 0.5, there is a weak correlation between the variables and when the values are between 0.5 and 0.9 there is a strong correlation. In this case, there is a weak positive correlation between the two variables. Since the coefficient is positive, there is a positive linear relationship between health status and years of education. When years in education increase, there is an improvement in health status of the individual. Question 1 (b) i. Number of doctor visits and gender The results of the regression are demonstrated in table 2....
16 Pages(4000 words)Essay
Econometrics Finance and Accounting Econometrics Question Model2 (Model 2) read = 419.7 – 18.6 * noroom – 50.0 * noeng + 29.4 * fiction N = 11984, R2 = 0.204 (1.7) (2.6) (3.1) (0.6) Interpretation of the coefficient for noroom Because noroom is one of the continuous variables, its coefficient is represented by -18.6 which is a constant. If the value of noroom increases, the model value reduces Hypothesis test In order to test for the hypothesis, we use t test as follows t = (1.7-2.6)/(3.1/SQRT(18.6)) = The t score is less than 0.5 at the 5% significance level (Dougherty, 2008). This confirms the null hypothesis, that the parameter is -20 against the alternative hypothesis that the parameter is greater than -20. Question 2 The...
3 Pages(750 words)Coursework
Applied Econometrics
...Applied Econometrics Q 5 each) Please interpret the coefficient estimates for β1 and β2 in Model (2). SOLUTION is the coefficient for the In(exports) and the value is -0.091 implying that there exists a negative relationship between the dependent variable (ln(GDP percapita)) and the independent variable (In exports). As such, a unit increase in In(exports) results to a decrease in the dependent variable (ln(GDP percapita)) by a factor of 0.091. is the coefficient for the In(size) and the value is 0.058 implying that there exists a positive relationship between the dependent variable (ln(GDP percapita)) and the independent variable (In(size)). As such, a unit increase in In(size) results to an increase...
4 Pages(1000 words)Statistics Project
... Question 3 Use the data set shorttbills.wf1. Limit the sample so that it begins in 2002. Regress the three month treasury bill rate (tb3ms) on the lagged three month rate and the twice lagged 6 month rate (tb6ms(-2)). Do the coefficients make much sense? (Okay, explain why they don’t.) Test, at the 1% level, for first-order serial correlation using the Breusch-Godfrey test. Now run the regression correcting for serial correlation by including AR(1) in the regression. Do the coefficients make sense now? Correct for second order serial correlation (add AR(1) and AR(2)). How about the coefficients now? The regression output looks like Dependent Variable: TB3MS Method: Least Squares Date: 09/17/12 Time: 15:24 Sample: 2002M01... Question 3...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment
... Econometrics Question Required coefficients in the estimate table become evident through writing of the needed estimates using the fitted model, μ12 will be = (ΣkY12k)/n12 = (Σkμ)/n12 + (Σkα1)/n12 + (Σkβ2)/n12 + (Σkαβ12)/n12 + (Σkε12k)/n12 We then assume that averages of the errors in this context are zero (εijk): = μ + α1 + β2 + αβ12 Question 2 In the same way, the mean in table 1 will be: μ11 = μ + α1 + β1 + αβ11 Getting the estimates of table 1 mean, add the estimates at μ, α1, β2, and αβ12. Achieving this goes by multiplying the solution vector with a vector coefficients (e.g. Sum-product) Solution for Coefficient estimates Effect a b Estimate Standard Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Intercept     21.6100 0.2958 72 83.21 <.0001 a 1... , the other...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment
...Lecturer’s and Number Submitted Econometrics In an influential article, ‘‘Hedonic Housing Prices and the Demand for Clean Air," David Harrison and Daniel Rubinfeld study the impact of improvements in air quality on local citizens as reflected through differences in housing prices. A simplified version of their model, which is to be studied, is ln(MVi) = β0 + β1RMi + β2 ln(DISi) +β3NOXi + β4DCHAS;i + Ɛi , (1) where the level of observation is the census tract. Further, MVi is the median housing price (measured in $1,000) for a given census tract in the Boston metropolitan statistical area. RM is the average number of rooms in owner occupied housing in the census tract; DIS is a weighted...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment
...Applied Econometric paper s Affiliation Introduction This paper gives answers to certain questions regarding a study by Acemoglu, Johnson & Robinson (2001): Colonial Origins of Comparative Development. In their study, they claim that countries with quality institutions and secure property rights appear to have higher economic growth than their counterparts. From the econometric model adopted by Acemoglu, Johnson & Robinson (2001), the following questions will be answered appropriately. Question 1 The coefficient estimate (β1) measures how economic growth increases due to the increase in institutions ` quality. Therefore, economic growth will increase by 43% whenever the quality of...
11 Pages(2750 words)Speech or Presentation
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Assignment on topic Applied Econometrics for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us