International Disputes and Foreign Policy - Assignment Example

How might the United Nations address recent nuclear North Korea bomb tests that can increase war possibility with the US?

The United Nation has been intervening in international disputes since its inception. The United Nations is set to enforce international laws and avoid the eruption of another World War. For any war to begin, there are always political motives which castigate and pose a reason for the disputes (Chanlett-Avery, 2014). Political ego, fight for resources, internal interference, deliberate attempts to prove superiority and dominance between nations have intensified these international disputes. Global peacekeeping is entrenched deeply as a mandate for the United Nations. United States relations and foreign policy in consideration of itself and worldwide interest have provoked talks on this international disputes. These global confrontations are ironed out, and resolutions are issued to be compiled by all parties. The United Nations since its inception has necessitated the end of many conflicts that crop up between nations through essential deliberations made by the Security Council.

The Security Council primary responsibility is ensuring that peace and security thrive among nations. It acts as a third party in its intervention to settle international disputes. The hostility between North Korea and the United States has heightened due to the increased number of testing of the ballistic missiles in the era of Kim Jong Un and President Donald Trump’s determinacy to preventive this regular tests citing the violation of international law. There have been threats by North Korea to push for military strikes in Guam, Hawaii and also various parts of the United States mainland. North Korea has also positioned weaponry aimed at Seoul, South Korea, an ally of the United States. Any provocation hinting any military attempt might result into mass causalities in the region (Helfand, 2013).

Previously, The United Nations has intervened to establish peace. For example, during the Gulf war, resolutions were passed to achieve peace and stability in the region. The recommendations include a cease-fire pledge and an order to destroy all weapons that might lead to mass causalities and destruction of property (Bell, 2015). This deliberation by the Security Council allowed rights of the individuals in Iraq to be upheld, but the militarization of the system by Britain and the United States against Iraq exposed the shortcomings of the body in its mandate to ensure peace and security thrive internationally. Numerous suggestions have been raised and encompassing with them with my ideas it is prudent that the United Nations policy to curb this international disputes should detail the following;

Diplomatic tools such as accommodation and compromise have been used to make sure that an agreement is meet so that peace and security are maintained, and a win-win resolution of the dispute obtained between the two nations. The Accommodation diplomacy tool provides an optimum resolution where the mutual interests of the rival parties are considered to end the stalemate. Compromise on the other hand envisages a give and take the scenario that faces a lot of criticisms because of its principal in giving in to opponent’s demands that may seem contrary to a nation’s beliefs and opinions. Other diplomacy tools should be well thought to determine the most suitable policy because of their demanding and expensive nature. Both of this diplomacy tools ideals are very politically instigated (Wolff, 2012). For instance, in 1994 the United States and North Korea made a deal which was mutually beneficial to both sides. The United States interest in stopping North Korea from plutonium extraction was met hence guaranteeing an assurance of meeting North Koreas needs for fuel for a specified period and a peace treaty assuring no nuclear attack against them.

China has built artificial islands in the South China Sea that can support military installations. The lack of indigenous population and inconsistency of claims by neighboring nations has seen China defiance in its quest to extend its maritime territory that will impose control in the region. The region has been an essential zone for fishing worldwide, and there exist resources such as oil and natural gas (Beckman, 2013). The United States has a significant stake in this busy South Sea trade route, and its interest will be affected if this quest continues. China’s unwillingness to comply with ruling at The Hague. The United States and its allies might uphold stringent measures such as economically instigated sanctions and constraints that will affect further building of islands in the South Sea. The United States had introduced the Rubio bill that had several restrictions whose main aim was to ensure diplomatic negotiations that will restrict China’s actions. The United States should use this as a deliberation to bargain China's support.

Various sectoral restrictions will require implementation of China and Russia. The United States has been inconsiderate of the views of these vetoes. The United States has illustrated this by foregoing its earlier restrictions which included a total freeze of the worker’s party assets, a complete import ban on oil and Kim Jong Un restrictions. Both China and Russia are committed to a peaceful denuclearization through dialogue and necessary consultations. The United States can also, decide to place sanctions on both China and Russia to compel them to support the nonproliferation efforts in the Korean peninsula but this measure would be detrimental to its economy. The United States through the United Nations should establish a tradeoff that will gain support from the Vetoes. The U.S should avoid interfering with Syria's regime and let Russia help it to solve its challenges.

The United Nations has passed resolutions inform of economic sanction on North Korea which targets its main exports. It includes; a ban on their textile exports, iron, and coal, putting a maximum limit on their import of oil and halt revenue streams such as joint ventures between themselves and other countries. Also, China and Russia being veto powers have applauded the United States decision through the United Nations to curb avenues that fund the bomb test programs. China, North Korea's leading trading partner, has also reduced trade to leverage the essential negotiations and talks on the ballistic test of its bombs. There is a ban on its main export because of violation of international treaties that are meant to gradually cut off funds enabling its nuclear industry and ballistic missile to thrive. The enforcement of this sanction ought to be supported extensively to necessitate the much-needed negotiations to end the stalemate.

Organs of the United Nations, particularly the General Assembly and the Security Council encompassing full support from the office of disarmament affairs should work in hand to ensure that international peace and security is maintained. This is an intervention that will assure nuclear-enabled weapons are eliminated. North Koreas advancement of nuclear weaponry is dangerous to its neighboring countries such as South Korea and Japan (Kwak, 2016). Instead, it should use its nuclear deposits to provide clean energy to serve its citizen’s needs. For several decades the United Nations through the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has been given the mandate to verify that extracted nuclear deposits are used for harmless purposes. This agency upholds this agreement in over and eighty states worldwide.

Through legally binding treaties by the United Nations disarmament efforts are enforced. This is meant to eliminate chemical, biological and nuclear weaponry(Roberts,2013). In the case of North Korea to the elimination of atomic weapons is paramount this has been well demonstrated at the local level where United Nation peacekeepers often work together with the parties in tension. North Korea should honor a disarmament treaty as a sign of goodwill and the United States of America ought to provide it with the necessary expertise to ensure smooth disarmament and cover the cost associated with it. This strategy will establish a quid pro which is usually in the best interest of both nations.

Therefore, gathering of substantive information is essential from both the United States and North Korea to carefully give analysis about the conflict. The United Nations through compromise and concessions should consider reciprocally cooperative interactions that are structured (Delpech, 2012). This strategy envisages that both of the parties achieve disarmament. North Korea makes a positive number in the reduction of its tests and bombs which should be mostly transparent and verifiable, and the U.S should also do the same with utmost good faith. There is mutual trust among the nations.

The United Nations needs to strengthen International law and treaties that each of its member states should show compliance. This need to be negotiated and the relevant parties' suggestions taken into account in the General Assembly. The United Nations concerning North Korea's bomb test should issue judgments and its well renowned advisory opinions through the International Court of Justice (ICJ). This should be settled through diplomatic relations, and the use of force should be the last option if all other avenues of solving the conflicts. Also, conflict preventive mechanisms need to be upheld through diplomatic measures using their offices in the respective countries so that the tensions building up, avoid any direct violent approach in settling the dispute.

The United Nations also in its approach needs to consider realistic and negotiable processes that can necessitate progress that involves continuous phases. Imposing of economic sanctions and preconditions will not necessarily bend North Korea into accepting to stop violation of intercontinental testing of its bombs (Snyder, 2013). An elaborate process would to peacefully initiate a stop in their nuclear and weapons testing programs. Using the concessions and compromise diplomacy tools the United States should then remove all its military drills that are close to their territory. This first approach will then provide a solution in the long run for both parties to satisfy their well genuine security concerns. The United Nations also, ought to consider an elaborate agreement that covers both the demands of the parties by including thoughts of establishing a "Korean War peace treaty."

Besides, negotiations should be held to ensure weapons in the region are nuclear-free by guaranteeing international security laws that will force North Korea to join the regional union. In the United Nations quest for ensuring equal rights and prosperity for humanity, they should also assist in improving North Korea’s economy which has degraded due to the many sanctions placed on them. The United States should also help to revitalize North Korea by assisting them to develop their energy. Disagreement between the United States and North Korea should not necessitate a war. The United Nations should demonstrate its credibility, purpose of establishment and leadership in its authority by ensuring that peace prevails at all cost. Conflicts usually result in human causalities and wastage of resources generated because of interests that are not of the common good.

The United Nations also, ought to strive to restore trust between this member states. Both nations in the past handled conflicts better for their prosperity and did not result in any acts of war. It is the primary priority of this member States to take part in negotiations that will ensure peace and security in the world.