The Poll to Ascertain the Popularity of Both Political Parties - Report Example

Student’s Name Professor’s Name Course Date Introduction The use of research methods to analyse different situations is rampant especially in matters related to consumer behaviours and advertisements. Consumer’s immediate attitude towards advertising and other notable exercises are studied in a more extensive manner in the United States of America, United Kingdom and even Australia markets. In the Australian market, research on consumers’ attitude towards certain issues has increased tremendously over a long of period. In fact, many polling research firms have also adopted the mechanism and thus, have gone ahead to identify how leaders’ performances are perceived by the underlying voters. How Did The Researchers Collect Data Including Participants (Sampling) The research survey was executed under a telephone interview system by the company’s immediate trained interviewers. The interview process was sampled across all states in Australia so that the population participants were accessed from both the city and country sections of Australia. In fact, it is noted that the telephone numbers and the people positioned within the households were all selected at a random nature. It is important to note that the informational data collected was firstly weighted before being used to reflect on the entire population distribution. The underlying survey was executed on at least 1161 respondents, who are eligible voters positioned within the city and country sections of Australia. Under the primary vote, the survey included at least four dependent variables that include; Coalition, Labor, Greens and others. There was at least 6 per cent of the population sample that was uncommitted while another 2 per cent refused in taking part in the exercise. Data Collection and Findings The research survey undertook a significant level of data collection where a number of variables were employed. First, the survey collected data related to primary vote. Under this collection process, the interviewers requested to know from the respondents the exact political party of their choice. The primary vote involved three major parties; Coalition, Labor and Greens and, “Others”. Results indicate that that for the two year period after the election conducted in 2013, the Coalition Party had lost its standings from 45.6% to 38% in the period between 2013 and 2015 respectively. The Labor Party had increased its popularity for the House of Representatives; the statistics standings increases from 33.3% to 39% in the period. The Greens Party had increased its standings from 8.7% to 12% while others experienced a reduced popularity primary vote by at least 1.4% within the same period. Secondly, the research survey undertook data collection on finding the two preferred political parties. Two party variable involved in the data collection was Coalition and Labor Party. Results of this data collection indicate that the Coalition Party had a reduced popularity preference with standings dropping from 53.5% at the time of election to 45% in 2015. On the contrary, the Labor Party had its preference amongst the respondents and thus, the larger section of the voters increase from 46.5% to 55% in the period between 2013 and 2015 respectively. Thirdly, the research involved data collection relating to Tony Abbott’s Performance as a Prime Minister. Data collection was measured against three distinctive variables that included satisfied, dissatisfied and uncommitted. The satisfied lot standings decreased from 36% to 28% in the period between 2014 and 2015 respectively. The Dissatisfied lot standings had increased from 55% to 63% as the uncommitted lot’s standings remained constant at 9% within the same period. Fourthly, the research survey took to collecting data related to Bill Shorten’s Performance as an opposition leader. In collecting data related to this research question at least four variables were employed; Satisfied, Dissatisfied and Uncommitted lot. The research findings of the study indicate that satisfied lot had remained constant at 39% in the two year periods after election; the dissatisfied lot standings increased slightly from 41% to 42% in 2014 and 2015 respectively; while the uncommitted lot standings reduced slightly from 20% to 19% within the same period. Fifth, data collection related to the study involved finding percentages of the respondents that were inclined to either Abbott, Shorten or were considered uncommitted. The research findings indicate that Abbott’s popularity index had decreased from 37% to 33% while Shorten’s increased slightly from 43% to 44%. The uncommitted lot had increased from 20% to 23% in the two year period after the elections. When Did They Collect Data The data collection process was conducted in varied periods. Both the primary vote and two-party preferred were conducted in the election period; 2013 and 2015 while Abbott’s performance, Shorten’s performance and “better prime minister” were all conducted in the period between November, 2014 and March, 2015. In my opinion, I think that the process of data collection has covered the three year period including polls from the election year in order to ensure of an effective and efficient comparison process. It is almost a challenge to compare two year period polls because a single year into a new government structure is not sufficient to allow collection of enough information pertaining to the performance and liking indexes of the political leaders. Why They Collected the Data From the analysis above, it can be seen that the researchers were only focused with comprehending the current standings on Australian political scene. They choose to find out the current standings of the most popular candidates and political parties since they had a chance of re-election and influence over the voters. The data collection process did not involve other variables because they did not have any significant influence over the entire population at hand. It can also be argued that the researchers have been following closely on the performances of both Abbott and Shorten prior and after the elections. In fact, the two are perceived to be the most popular candidates and thus, assessing the way Australia voters rate their capacities two years down the line is significant enough to prompt a successful comparison in the future. In essence, it is established that the sitting government at least needs a significant political boost of 40 per cent or more from current year’s budget, which Abbott seeks to use in order to maximize on two most popular packages; jobs and small business ventures as well as families and childcare. It is apparent that Abbott and the Coalition Party cannot win elections unless the primary vote is considered to be above the 40 per cent mark. He has previously attained this mark given the fact that he had made stringent policies in handling matters related to security issues as well as the condemnation of Islamic State acts of violence. Thus, the poll study has been conducted in order to ascertain whether or not the current political parties are fairly placed to secure the trust of the voters, which means either retaining their political influence or loose to the opposition. Methodological Approach In my opinion, the methodological approach employed by the researchers was effective and all-inclusive. Most of the common variables within a political scene were analysed and evaluated in order to establish their respective standings. It can be seen that data collection involved both the current government as well as the opposition. The analysis of these sides is effective in ascertaining the exact sentiments of the people. Notwithstanding, the methodology has taken to analyse the election and two periods after it. The evaluation of these two periods is efficient and covers the period effectively. Subsequently, the use of data from respondents in both cities and country sections of Australia provides a true picture of the results. In fact, their use has helped to eliminate possible bias. The only limitation on the entire research survey rests with the fact it has been solely focused on Abbott and Shorten performances while there might be others belonging to different political parties. Discussion of the Analysis The current political based research study has brought together a number of disparate findings on the political leaders’ popularity level, their political parties’ prowess as well as the perception of the voters towards performance levels for all leaders. The research poll has identified and focused on the aforementioned variables in order to determine the overall perspective of Australians in matters politics. It is important to ascertain that there have been significant statistical differences, which have been employed in order to showcase the exact differences emanating from the different levels of attitude and liking people have for both the current ruling political party and leaders. The fact that the poll study has opted to include respondents from both the country and city population ensures that the views and liking of people towards their respective favourite leaders and political parties conforms to the structures put in place to oversee any given research poll successfully. The measure has also been employed in order to ensure that the element of biasness is cut down to its minimal lest it interferes with the overall findings of the study. To sum up the discussion above, it can be seen that the poll research study was conducted to ascertain the popularity and performances of both political parties and their respective leaders. Read More

The Labor Party had increased its popularity for the House of Representatives; the statistics standings increases from 33.3% to 39% in the period. The Greens Party had increased its standings from 8.7% to 12% while others experienced a reduced popularity primary vote by at least 1.4% within the same period. Secondly, the research survey undertook data collection on finding the two preferred political parties. Two party variable involved in the data collection was Coalition and Labor Party. Results of this data collection indicate that the Coalition Party had a reduced popularity preference with standings dropping from 53.

5% at the time of election to 45% in 2015. On the contrary, the Labor Party had its preference amongst the respondents and thus, the larger section of the voters increase from 46.5% to 55% in the period between 2013 and 2015 respectively. Thirdly, the research involved data collection relating to Tony Abbott’s Performance as a Prime Minister. Data collection was measured against three distinctive variables that included satisfied, dissatisfied and uncommitted. The satisfied lot standings decreased from 36% to 28% in the period between 2014 and 2015 respectively.

The Dissatisfied lot standings had increased from 55% to 63% as the uncommitted lot’s standings remained constant at 9% within the same period. Fourthly, the research survey took to collecting data related to Bill Shorten’s Performance as an opposition leader. In collecting data related to this research question at least four variables were employed; Satisfied, Dissatisfied and Uncommitted lot. The research findings of the study indicate that satisfied lot had remained constant at 39% in the two year periods after election; the dissatisfied lot standings increased slightly from 41% to 42% in 2014 and 2015 respectively; while the uncommitted lot standings reduced slightly from 20% to 19% within the same period.

Fifth, data collection related to the study involved finding percentages of the respondents that were inclined to either Abbott, Shorten or were considered uncommitted. The research findings indicate that Abbott’s popularity index had decreased from 37% to 33% while Shorten’s increased slightly from 43% to 44%. The uncommitted lot had increased from 20% to 23% in the two year period after the elections. When Did They Collect Data The data collection process was conducted in varied periods.

Both the primary vote and two-party preferred were conducted in the election period; 2013 and 2015 while Abbott’s performance, Shorten’s performance and “better prime minister” were all conducted in the period between November, 2014 and March, 2015. In my opinion, I think that the process of data collection has covered the three year period including polls from the election year in order to ensure of an effective and efficient comparison process. It is almost a challenge to compare two year period polls because a single year into a new government structure is not sufficient to allow collection of enough information pertaining to the performance and liking indexes of the political leaders.

Why They Collected the Data From the analysis above, it can be seen that the researchers were only focused with comprehending the current standings on Australian political scene. They choose to find out the current standings of the most popular candidates and political parties since they had a chance of re-election and influence over the voters. The data collection process did not involve other variables because they did not have any significant influence over the entire population at hand. It can also be argued that the researchers have been following closely on the performances of both Abbott and Shorten prior and after the elections.

In fact, the two are perceived to be the most popular candidates and thus, assessing the way Australia voters rate their capacities two years down the line is significant enough to prompt a successful comparison in the future.

Read More