Should the u.s Make a Peace with Iran - Assignment Example

Should the U.S make a peace with Iran? PRO: Yes, Should the U.S make a peace with Iran because The USA should make peace with Iran because both countries have different political and military interest in the Middle East conflicts such as in Syria, Israel, Afghanistan and Lebanon, which ultimately undermines any peace efforts. 2. Concerns over nuclear proliferation is a core threat of peace and stability for both countries, thus a peace pact between the two countries will enhance the implementation of the Non-Proliferation Treaty 3. The global economic climate will improve greatly, owing to the creation of a state of international peace and stability, through boosting investor confidence after the removal of the Iran sanction 4. Iran is a potential fertile ground for terrorism cells to take root and thrive, thus the creation of a peace deal between the USA and Iran will step-up the global fight against terrorism. 5. The creation of a stable international order requires Iran as an ally rather than an enemy, a scenario that is better than when both Iran and North Korea are on the same path Con: No, U.S should not make a peace with Iran because… 1. The peace deal between Iran and the USA jeopardizes the traditional and much stronger relationship between the USA and Israel, which has proved to be sustainable 2. The peace deal between the USA and Iraq cannot be guaranteed a reasonable lifespan 3. The peace deal with Iran creates an impression that it is possible for any country to go against all decent international accords and still get away with it 4. The realignment of Iran towards the USA might spark more tension between the USA and the Middle East, thus creating more enemies than there currently exists 5. The results of a failed diplomacy attempt to create peace between the USA and Iran will make the situation worse than it currently stands The strong feeling by some people, that making peace with Iran is the gateway to enhancing the relationship between the East and the West, resonates with the idea of establishing peace between the USA and Irani. Diplomacy coupled with the removal of sanctions could persuade Iran to abandon its nuclear weapon mission, which would in turn be a very positive move towards defeating the global nuclear crisis. This is because; when Russia is left out of the picture, North Korea and Iran remains the most potentially dangerous nuclear-weapon infested nations, and their will to solder on with the nuclear mission has surpassed the international sanctions or any threat of military interventionii. Thus, on the event that it would be possible to bring Iran on the negotiating table and end the long-standing hostilities between Iran and the USA, the war on nuclear weapon will have made a great headwayiii. According to global political and security systems analysts, terrorism is the major threat to the global peace and stability in the 21st centuryiv. Terrorism is never an isolated activity that would thrive on its own when left in a desert. Rather, it breathes life from the political instability and the political tensions between the West and the Islamic nationsv. Iran is one of such fertile grounds where the threat of terrorism can gain root and grow to uncontainable levels, especially backed by the nuclear threat posed by the nation. Therefore, the possibility of bringing Iraq on board as a peaceful ally of the USA will be a great advantage in the war against terrorism, since Iran would not only neutralize the threat of sprouting domestic terror cells, but will also assists the USA in stemming the terrorism elements from the Middle East. The political interests between the USA and Iran seem to never converge, when it comes to their interests in Syria, Lebanon Afghanistan and Israelvi. These notable differences make the possibility of establishing a long-lasting peace solution in the Middle East, and more so in Syria, a mere illusion. However, on the event that Iran and the USA would forge an alliance as strong allies against the violations of the international standards on human rights that have characterized the Syrian crisis, it would be easier for the international community to address this conflict on the same frontvii. The same applies for the never-ending conflict between Israel and Palestine, on which the USA and Iran have been pulling in different directionsviii. This simply means that the possibility of a peace deal between the USA and Iran is a possibility of a more stable Middle East. Finally, investor confidence is another element that could be boosted by the creation of peace between the USA and Iran. The mere mention of the possibility of the West establishing a peace pact with Iran had an impact on almost all major global stock marketsix. In this respect, should the USA and Iran manage to come to a round table and agree on a permanent formula of ending the hostilities between the two nations, the global economic and trade environment will improve for the better, since the prospect of trade between the West and the Middle East is a sure springboard for more resource exploitation for the benefit of the global societyx. This is most especially because; on the event that the USA and Iran forge a peace alliance, then their unity would find a way of reaching other Islamic zones that are full of unexploited natural resources wealth such as Saudi Arabia, Lebanon and the Gaza regionsxi. The outcome would be a more prosperous global economy. Other circles have held that the USA should not establish a peace deal with Iran. For instance, Israel has held that a more economically prosperous Iran would be much dangerous compared to the Iran of present dayxii. In this respect, it is very open that Israel, a longstanding ally of the USA would not favor any attempt to have Iran and the USA at peace, or it would take the option of pulling awayxiii. Thus, it is for the USA to evaluate what is more beneficial between a long-standing relationship with Israel, or the unguaranteed attempt to have peace with Iran. Critics have held the opinion that; as opposed to trying to establish peace with Iran, the USA and the West should step up the sanctionsxiv. The argument behind this thought is that the attempt to establish peace with Iran is a sure way to tell the rest of the nations seeking to flout all the decent international accords that it is alright to do so, as long as one is capable of standing their ground until they are persuaded through incentivesxv. What would happen on the event that the attempt to pacify the relationship between the USA and Iran fails after all? Political pundits have held that such results would be even more disastrous to the global peace and security mission, since Iran and its sympathizers will walk away determined to breach the last of the international accordsxvi. This is because; the concept of permanent enmity would be sealed and there would be no turning back for Iran and its sympathizers in doing all that would hurt the West even more. The final reason seen as the basis of opposing the establishment of peace between the USA and Iran is the fact that; if there is anything as difficult to guarantee in this life, then it is the long-lasting peace relationship between the USA and Iranxvii. Suspicion has always been the order of the day in any dealings between the East and the West, but nothing would require treading carefully than signing a peace pact with Iran, since it is never known when the nation will feel it has achieved its economic goal through exploiting the removal of economic sanctions, and then turn back on the USA and the Westxviii. Therefore, in consideration of the above evidence, the United States should not make peace with Iran. There is no doubt that the prospects of a peaceful relationship between the USA and Iran is not only of great benefit to the USA foreign policy realization, but also to the global peace, security and economic status. However, while the benefits accrued from the peace deal are more appealing, nothing would be devastating than entering into a peace deal with a historically rebellious nation, which offers no guarantee at all, that it will keep it words. After all, having defied the world for all that long, what would prevent Iran from violating the peace agreement immediately it feels that it has reached its economic benefit target? There is more danger in a more prosperous Iran, than there already is currently. For these reasons, it is better to let Iran decide to abide by the already established terms of sanctions, and then when it has proven faithful and trustworthy; it can be considered for further leniency. Read More