Representation is an integral part of the theory and practice of modern diplomacy. That notwithstanding, the concept of representation is not always easy to articulate given that it has so many interpretations as well as varying methods of implementation by different countries…
Download file to see previous pages...
In the past, literature in the field of diplomacy has defined representation in various ways, some of which are even conflicting when it comes to its role in international relations in contemporary and future society. However, the importance of diplomatic representation in diplomacy would depend on the meaning attributed to this concept. As a result, the relevance of diplomatic representation has become the centre of a major debate about the importance of diplomacy in a fast evolving world. It's hard for us to picture what ancient diplomacy was all about. However, the diplomacy in the Greek and Roman civilizations was intermittent and generated no permanent in situations.1 (Hamilton and Langhorne 995: 7)
"In order to dispense with diplomacy, that is with the methods used by independent governments to work out their own relations with one another, mankind would either have to let independent governments exist without the diplomatic dialogue, or else dispense with independence and 'sovereign states' altogether. They would not be able to conclude peace settlements or treaties with their neighbours, for such settlements are the essence of diplomacy. Each would have to stand alone against a more powerful and aggressive neighbour. They would not be able to get into touch with one another, to band together or form leagues and alliances for mutual protection."2 (Watson 1991:22)
THE EVOLUTION OF REPRESENTATION IN DIPLOMACY
In the ancient days, representation was not so strong in diplomacy. Niccolo Machiavelli was a great ruler of his time. He is quite famous for his political theory. However, little is known about his reflections on diplomacy. Machiavelli emerged when diplomacy just began its transformation that saw the creation of resident embassies. (Berridge 2001:7-8)
In order for us to assess the role of diplomacy in today's world, some scholars argue that residential bilateral diplomacy is gradually becoming irrelevant. However, other scholars continue to uphold this type of diplomacy. These debates have been initiated by the changes that are occurring in the international system. Some scholars believe that the practice of diplomacy needs to adjust in order to adapt to the new environment, meanwhile others feel that the traditional methods still the answer the question today. (Berridge 2001:136) In the past, debates over globalization and global governance claimed that the role of governments decline over the years. But that hasn't happened. We are now witnessing different trends that prove this argument wrong.
There is still much government participation in the ways in which government agencies operate. The structures of contemporary diplomacy now operate in such a way that they do not only go out to articulate the international goals and policies of the state. Today's diplomatic structures also tend to represent components of the increasing network of global governance. The transformations in the structures of diplomacy strongly depict the ways in which governments are responding to the changes in the international system. (Manojlovic and Thorheim 2007:12)
Changes in the practice of diplomacy began with the introduction of the principle of self-determination, and then later proceeded into the era of
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Concept of Representation in Diplomacy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 5000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/politics/1519160-concept-of-representation-in-diplomacy
(Concept of Representation in Diplomacy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 5000 Words)
“Concept of Representation in Diplomacy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 5000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/politics/1519160-concept-of-representation-in-diplomacy.
The US has both aspects of a representative and direct democracy. The president and the members of the House are voted in by the electorate to represent their views on various issues. However, in other issues, for example, change of the constitution members of the public directly vote to express their views.
Diplomacy refers to any negotiations or moves used to have two parties reach an agreement. The diplomacy standards, procedures, and protocols have changed over time. As times changed, so did the agendas of negotiations and the expertise. Modern diplomacy utilizes procedures and standards that can efficiently address current problems.
According to Goldsmith and Carter, one of the reasons is that necessitated the need to acknowledge the need for change is performance profile which is indicative of: dwindling volumes of sales and stock with depreciating values; internal investigations that suggest alleged leaks; the danger of imminent takeovers by either of Avon Products' suitors; and the investigations that touched on charges of bribery in China.
In the very recent article in reputable Washington Post, former ambassador to NATO Kurt Volker suggests that “attending the 2014 Olympics under today’s circumstances” equals to “cementing in practice Russia’s changing European borders by force”. Contemporary athletes become ambassadors of political regimes and representatives of national culture.
While the media prides itself of being the watchdog of human society, much of its purported objectivity, factuality and truth-speaking fades away in times of conflict especially if they are located in states-at-war or in geographical or cultural proximity of the conflicting states.
Nowadays it has become obvious that there is some vacuum in existent international relations. Today we face some serious disagreements with respect to the question what kind of world order should be established in the twenty first century.
The arriving of new age has left us a handle to give thought to the future of international relations and the role of world diplomacy in their evolution.
By virtue of the aforementioned, most, if not all, Diplomatic Missions comprise within themselves commercial, political, legal and military state representations, among others. Focusing on military representation, this report will elucidate upon the functions and purposes of Defence Diplomacy Missions.
In both the cases, the attempt was failed miserably at the end. Napoleon was defeated in the Waterloo battle and central powers suffered humiliating defeat in World War 1.
Both the Vienna Congress and the Versailles peace
Furthermore, within these models of international relations theory, commentators have also addressed the roles of diplomats in international relations theory and the focus of this paper is to critically evaluate the role of diplomacy in international relations. It is