Nobody downloaded yet

Intervene or not Intervene - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The U.S. intervention to different countries is interrupted in different way by various critics according to their perception about the world. It is no doubt that U.S. is known for its richness for natural wealth, technology superiority, and best democracy in the whole world. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.9% of users find it useful
Intervene or not Intervene
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Intervene or not Intervene"

Download file to see previous pages Now the world leaders need to be more diplomatic and polite in dealing with other countries and leaders of the world in order to avoid any dispute. Since the September 11 attacks on the United States, most people in the world agree that the perpetrators need to be brought to justice, without killing many thousands of civilians in the process. But unfortunately, the U.S. military has always accepted massive civilian deaths as part of the cost of war. The military is now poised to kill thousands of foreign civilians, in order to prove that killing U.S. civilians is wrong. It is said in the media repeatedly that some Middle Easterners hate the U.S. only because of their "freedom" and "prosperity." Is it right? The U.S. deployed forces in the Persian Gulf after the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, which turned Washington against its former Iraqi ally Saddam Hussein. U.S. supported the Kuwaiti monarchy and the Muslim fundamentalist monarchy in neighboring Saudi Arabia against the secular nationalist Iraq regime. In January 1991, the U.S. and its allies unleashed a massive bombing assault against Iraqi government and military targets, in intensity beyond the raids of World War II and Vietnam. Up to 200,000 Iraqis were killed in the war and its immediate aftermath of rebellion and disease, including many civilians who died in their villages, neighborhoods, and bomb shelters. The U.S. continued economic sanctions that denied health and energy to Iraqi civilians, who died by the hundreds of thousands, according to United Nations agencies. The U.S. also instituted "no-fly zones" and virtually continuous bombing raids, yet Saddam was politically bolstered as he was militarily weakened.
Other so-called "humanitarian interventions" were centered in the Balkan region of Europe, after the 1992 breakup of the multiethnic federation of Yugoslavia. The U.S. watched for three years as Serb forces killed Muslim civilians in Bosnia, before its launched decisive bombing raids in 1995. Even then, it never intervened to stop atrocities by Croatian forces against Muslim and Serb civilians, because those forces were aided by the U.S. In 1999, the U.S. bombed Serbia to force President Slobodan Milosevic to withdraw forces from the ethnic Albanian province of Kosovo, which was torn a brutal ethnic war. The bombing intensified Serbian expulsions and killings of Albanian civilians from Kosovo, and caused the deaths of thousands of Serbian civilians, even in cities that had voted strongly against Milosevic. When a NATO occupation force enabled Albanians to move back, U.S. forces did little or nothing to prevent similar atrocities against Serb and other non-Albanian civilians. The U.S. was viewed as a biased player, even by the Serbian democratic opposition that overthrew Milosevic the following year.
Even when the U.S. military had apparently defensive motives, it ended up attacking the wrong targets. After the 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies in East Africa, the U.S. "retaliated" not only against Osama Bin Lad en's training camps in Afghanistan, but a pharmaceutical plant in Sudan that was mistakenly said to be a chemical warfare installation. Bin Laden retaliated by attacking a U.S. Navy ship docked in Yemen in 2000. After the 2001 terror attacks on the United States, the U.S. military is poised to again bomb Afghanistan, and possibly move ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Intervene or not Intervene Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Intervene or Not Intervene Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words)
“Intervene or Not Intervene Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Intervene or not Intervene

Should the government intervene in the OTC markets, pros and cons and US versus Canada

...?Should the government intervene in the OTC markets, pros and cons and US versus Canada? Introduction An over the counter market (OTC) is a decentralized market for securities where market players trade over the telephone and other electronic systems instead of the physical trading on the floor (Poitras 50). Trading occurs through middlemen commonly referred as the dealers who buy and sell securities on behalf of their clients (Williams 29). Securities traded in this market are not listed on the organized stock exchanges such as the Nasdaq Stock market. Some securities that are traded in the over the counter markets include common stocks, bonds, and derivatives such as forward contracts and interest rate swaps. OTC market...
9 Pages(2250 words)Research Paper

Should the Fed intervene in Asset Bubbles

...& No Asset Bubbles (Should the Fed Intervene 12 March INTRODUCTION The current global recession has its origins in the housing mortgage meltdown of the United States that started in December 2007. Prior to that, specifically in the period between years 2000 to 2006, residential housing prices in the US almost doubled. Judging from a short span of time for such a significant asset class to double its value (dubious at best), economists were almost in uniform agreement that an asset bubble had existed during that period and had burst in late 2007. With the benefit of hindsight, experts, pundits and kibitzers alike wonder if the American Federal Reserve Bank could have acted differently and avoided all the heartache of a...
35 Pages(8750 words)Thesis

Should the Outside World Intervene to Help the Victims of Violence In Syria

...Should the outside world intervene to help the victims of violence in Syria? Should the outside world intervene to help the victims of violence in Syria? Outside intervention in Syria could tip the scale either way. Listed below are the main pros and cons of outside intervention in Syria. Five Strongest Pros Proponents propagate outside intervention in Syria because the Syrian people are being mistreated by the government; reforms that they were promised when Bashar al-Assad took over in 2000 have not yet been implemented. The Syrian government has also committed outrageous human rights violations which have garnered much international support from the outside world for the oppressed Syrians. The...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Should the outside world intervene to help the victims of violence in Syria

...Should the outside world intervene to help the victims of violence in Syria? PRO: Yes, the outside world should intervene to help the victims of violence in Syria because … 1. It will go a long way in rescuing innocent people who are perishing in the war. 2. The need to build stability in the region is overriding, considering the high threat of terrorism in the modern world. 3. To maintain the vital role played by Syria in the Middle East politics 4. It is a major step towards building a peaceful world 5. It is the duty of all nations to safeguard human rights, despite no matter where they are being violated. CON: No the outside world should not intervene to help the victims of violence...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

The United States should intervene in the Syrian Civil War to overthrow the Assad regime

.... This is the reason why the United States is duty bound to intervene in this conflict on the side of the rebels and overthrow this regime to end it. It is estimated that more than sixty thousand Syrians have lost their lives since the beginning of the conflict and such a high number of deaths is not reasonable. This number of deaths for the sake of a few men holding on to power is unacceptable and the United States, as the defender of democracy, should lead the way in overthrowing them (Friedman). Syria is one of the countries of the Middle East whose stability and strategic position is essential for the maintenance of stability in the region. The conflict that is currently going on in this country is likely to...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Should the Government Intervene in the labour market

...Government Involvement in the Labor Markets Government Involvement in the Labor Markets Labor market plays a key role inpropelling the economic growth of a nation since it provides a platform where the employers compete for the best employees that ascertain goal realization of a firm, while the employees compete for the best job positions that suit their capabilities. The interaction of the employer and employees is critical in the various levels of goal realization of organizations, and government involvement in this relationship has diverse impacts in an economy. Government Intervention in the labor markets remains to be a contentious issue with some individuals advocating for its involvement while others opposing it. Various... Involvement...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

The topic is whether government should intervene in society concerning economic issues

...Throughout the of history, as seen in various parts of the world, Governments have increasingly tried to control Economic action through its policies, which include taxation, formation of minimum wage rates, and even using military force to conquer and rule markets – as in the case of the once Glorious British Empire and its commercial wing – The East India Company. (Landow). Two economic concepts are the most popularly used by countries worldwide: Capitalism and Communism. While Communism, advocates total control of the economy by the Government, Capitalism is the complete opposite, which is based on ‘Minimum Government Intervention’ (SAHO). In early American History, the Government refrained from controlling or...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Should states intervene in internal affairs of other countries

...SHOULD S INTERVENE IN INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF OTHER S By Location Introduction Forceful Humanitarian Intervention which involves the use of military force in a bid to prevent the contravention of the fundamental human rights of citizens in another state has become one of the leading debates in the application of ethical principles in the international affairs. The protection of human rights of civilians are a motivation driven by ethical objectives. However, intervening into the affairs of another state contravenes the sovereignty law that governs the right to sovereignty of each state. This is in conformation to the international law provided in the United Nations charter and customary international law....
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

The Duty to Intervene in Conflicts Around the World

...The Duty to Intervene in Conflicts around the World On April 6, 1994, a missile shot the plane of the President of Rwanda, President Habyarimana, a Hutu. For weeks after his assassination, around 200,000 Hutus killed the Tutsis, an ethnic minority with whom they have a long-time ethnic rivalry. The result is the Rwanda genocide wherein 800,000 to more than a million were believed to have been brutally killed. Many of the Tutsis were murdered through machetes hacking their bodies, men, women, children, even infants, alike, only because they were Tutsis (“Genocide in Rwanda”). France, Belgium, the United States, and even the United Nations, did not intervene to stop the slaughter, and instead, they decided to pull out 90... % of their...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Should the U.S. intervene in the Syria conflict

...East nation-states are mystified on how to cease Syrian conflict (Hashemi and Postel, p.5). Several politics and moral arguments have emerged lately concerning the intervention of the U.S. in addressing conflict of Syria. This paper will justify the involvement of the U.S. in Syrian conflict and refute some of the opposing arguments against the intervention. Reasons for U.S. Intervention in Syrian Conflict First, through sending of its forces to Syria, the U.S. could alleviate massive slaughtering of Syrian civilians. The U.S. has to intervene for humanitarian purposes and to prevent a similar occurrence in the future. Morgan-Russell (p.1) argues that in 1994, the international community watched as Rwandan Hutu group...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Case Study on topic Intervene or not Intervene for FREE!

Contact Us