All nations strive to achieve and maintain domestic jurisdiction because it defines them. It is what gives them identity as a separate entity. It is what sets them apart from the global community. A nation who has domestic jurisdiction can be likened to an individual who acts on his own accord and is responsible for all his actions and the consequences thereof…
Download file to see previous pages...
The concept of domestic jurisdiction in relation to freedom from intervention is very basically shown in the unit of society we call family. Before we became citizens of a country, we became parts of a state or a city. Before we became parts of any city, we are first members of a community, and before we became members of a community, we are primarily members of our own families. This is where the dynamic process of protecting one owns freedom and autonomy begins. As a family, we want to function on our own to the best of our abilities with minor help from other people. This is our responsibility to our unit. We want to deal with problems and seek out solutions with each other's help, before we ask assistance from other people. We try to keep family matters inside the home and away from the prying eyes of other families. We do not welcome intervention from other people in family matters without them being requested by us to do so. This action is not appreciated and even shunned as intrusion does not only violate privacy but it goes beyond the unwritten rule of familial boundaries where each family as a distinct unit of society has its own internal rules which the members abide to. These internal rules, however free the family members are in terms of acting on their own will, should be in accordance with the established general laws of the community. Intervention in family matters by other community members is justifiable if the laws of the community are not adhered to and if a certain member of the family is forced to act out of his own volition. This is also where law enforcement may intervene.
The same is true for communities. Communities have their own specific agenda and priorities. It is because of the distinct agenda that a community is very wary of intervention from other communities. Resources are limited in communities so intervention is most likely to occur as a means to help or assist. It may also be mutually beneficial to both parties concerned. Going to a higher level or a wider scope, cities or states have the same characteristics. They may belong to one government and one country, but cities or states have their own set of rules aside from the general laws of the land. They have differing strategies and techniques to promote growth within their reach. They want to handle their own problems and issues first before transferring them to a higher authority. They want to exercise their autonomy the best possible way they can, before submitting to the authority of the government. Of course, every action that they do should be within the general laws of the land. The moment that laws are broken and disregarded, intervention from government will always occur.
The principles discussed are all parts of the concept of domestic jurisdiction. They are the minor aspects and the foundation for the general idea of the term. In a larger setting, which is the global arena, the basic unit is the nation. A nation has its own members, its own rules, its own ways or techniques of doing things, its own resources and its own beliefs and values. All the factors comprising one nation may be slightly or very different from another. This degree of diversity makes each nation distinct from each
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Domestic Jurisdiction Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 5000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/politics/1499888-domestic-jurisdiction
(Domestic Jurisdiction Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 5000 Words)
“Domestic Jurisdiction Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 5000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/politics/1499888-domestic-jurisdiction.
What are the implications of the principle of complementary jurisdiction in the statute of international court with special reference to the role of universal jurisdiction in the international justice system?
Under international law, a jurisdiction in criminal matters can be either enforcement jurisdiction or prescribed, also known as prescriptive jurisdiction. Enforcement jurisdiction is the state’s power to apply national criminal law through its enforcement institutions such as the police or the executive via the courts (O’Keefe, 736-737).
However, the mass atrocities committed during World War II provided impetus for the recognition of the necessity of promoting and preserving human freedom and rights, which recognition is embodied in international documents such as the Atlantic Charter (1941) and the Teheran Declaration (1942).
The instant case shall test once again, the feasibility of the Statute of the ICJ particularly the Optional Clause which allows a party to accept the jurisdiction of the Court ipso facto, subject only to any reservation it may incorporate along with its Declaration of Acceptance, to end or settle a dispute.
Different states and federal administrative bodies have jurisdictions over the conduct of private sector investigators, as well as private employers. According to Barbara (2001), Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) have the authority to review charges against employers and their agents of unfair discriminatory practices and labor practices.
The origins of the internet date back to as early as the 1960s. It's evolution changed the course of communication and computer technology spanning a diversity of people and cultures. The benefits that the Internet has accorded are so enormous and innovative that the generation today could not imagine the world without it.