The purpose of this study “British Politics and the European Union” is to describe еhe relationship between Britain and the European Union. The history of the British relationship with the European Union leaves some questions unanswered…
Download file to see previous pages...
As observed by Scheffler (2008: 37), the media has been given whole opportunity to highlight the weaknesses of European Union and as a result, the sense of skepticism has continued to deepen. This has also resulted into the deepening of the differences between the parties in the integration and hence resulting into a more sophisticated debate on the merits of the integration. This is believed to be one of the reasons that have shaped the British approach to Europe which is important as well before one can describe British as an awkward partner in the union (Bache & Jordan, 2006:4). However, these are failures of the government and do not justify the British awkwardness with respect to the affairs of the integration. As stated by Booker & Richard (2003:174), however, all independent nations would want to benefit from all the economic integrations tat they are engaged in and hence would participate in the affairs of such integrations if they benefit. Lack of favoritism policies of the European Union is therefore perceived as a reason for awkwardness.However, as stated by Bache & Jordan (2006:5), the late membership of Britain to the European Union must have cost the nation greatly. Since Britain joined the European Union late after other members states had joined and set rules and regulations, some politicians have argued that the rules were set in favor of the existing members. As a result, Britain has not benefited much from the joining of the integration (2006:5)....
dent nations would want to benefit from all the economic integrations tat they are engaged in and hence would participate in the affairs of such integrations if they benefit. Lack of favoritism policies of the European Union is therefore perceived as a reason for awkwardness. However, as stated by Bache & Jordan (2006:5), the late membership of Britain to the European Union must have cost the nation greatly. Since Britain joined the European Union late after other members states had joined and set rules and regulations, some politicians have argued that the rules were set in favor of the existing members. As a result, Britain has not benefited much from the joining of the integration. This means that the policies and regulations of the integration do not benefit the nation. The rules that were set in favor of the founding members states therefore presents a technical constraint to Britain and hence presents it as an awkward member. This reflects the fact that the political practices as well as the constitutional attitudes of the founders of the European Union are different from those that the United Kingdom was accustomed. The relationship between the integration and the United Kingdom is therefore very difficult as the nations and the Union’s policies and constitutions are not homogenous. The differences in the constitution have therefore presented difficulties with regard to the United Kingdom’s relation to the integration. For example, the basis of the European Union is the separation of the powers of institutions as well as political coalitions unlike the British’s emphasis on centralized state, an adversarial “winner take all” as a style of party politics and the informal constitution. In this context, it is difficult for the nation to benefit adequately
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The European Union has gone through various changes since its formation to a point that its institutions and policies are of global significance that is unmatched by any other international organizational (Moravcsik 2005, 349). In the Eurozone, quotas, tariffs and almost all customs barriers have been abolished (Moravcsik 2005, 349).
Accordingly, the European Union has evolved dramatically in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union and has recently undergone multiple stages of expansion. Bulgaria and Romania are the two most recent inductees into this exclusive club and full Bulgarian integration into the European Union has been stymied by a variety of domestic factors.
However, once overfishing became a concern, each member state was given quotas as to how many fish could be caught in its waters. This led to an effort in the UK to stop Spanish fishermen from "quota hopping" by demanding that fishing boats in UK waters be "materially connected" to the UK in ways more significant than the weak terms of the Merchant Shipping Act 1894 (Drewry, p.
Chabot stated that this revolution involves the solidification of a European market of goods and services, major structural changes in countries plagued by fiscal negligence, and the reorganization of monetary policy in some of the world’s most advanced industrialized economies. The “European Single Market” is “the world’s largest domestic market”.
It perceives its currency and autonomy as the 'sovereignty issue', though the debate usually has little to do with national sovereignty in strict terms of international law; identity and policy autonomy.
The liberal free-trade proposed by the European Union threatens particular institutional structure for both its economy and its state.
As Schmidt (2006) writes, Britain always has had difficulties in adapting to the integration of the European Union and always had problems with the EU in general. Britain's relationship with EU is largely controversial and unresolved and not even completely explicable for that matter.
certain shortcomings, have overall been quite beneficial to EU members and have strengthened the bonds between member states while enhancing the democratic character of the European Union. In fact this essay argues that the failure of the recent EU Constitutional actually
n Union acts as an administering body which supervises the acts of its member countries pertaining to various areas like generation of trade and employment, promoting a safer environment and efficient transport operations. The European Union started its expansion program from
The statement “Parliament is the Supreme law of the land”, simply serves to indicate that no law or an act of parliament that is established by the British Parliament can be regarded as unconstitutional . In this respect, it serves to indicate that the United Kingdom parliament still remains the supreme law of the land.
The system is used in both national and sub-national legislatures that were commonwealth and ex-commonwealth nations upon responsible governments are granted (Archers & Butcher, 1996, pg.67).
Recently Britain got in political
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic British Politics and the European Union for FREE!