Should Global Poverty be a U.S National Security Issue - Essay Example

Should Global Poverty Be A U.S National Security Issue? Global poverty is a phenomenon that has been in existence for quite a long time now. However, it is noteworthy that it is an aspect of global in equality. By this, I mean that, in most of the countries, there exists an exceptionally wide gap between the upper and the lower class. Some have no middle class at all. This is reflected in the wider picture with the developed countries having massive wealth, as opposed to the peanuts in the developing world. What does this imply? This is so dangerous to the mutual coexistence of these people. Mostly, global poverty has been continually ignored under the pretence that it is not a problematic issue but a social issue of specific countries (Galore and Weil, p 806). Realistically, this is an environmental problem. This is because, for such people in such circumstances, they have an effect to the environment. By this, I mean that, these difficult economic situations do force them to indulge in behaviors that are environmentally unsustainable. For instance, a country in Sub Saharan Africa will be more likely to engage in charcoal burning due to the financial constraints. This may be in an effort to look for money through its sale to sustain their troublesome life or to use it as firewood instead of the cleaner biogas. This in turn, has an effect on global climate by contributing to augmented discharge of green house gases into the atmosphere leading to global warming. Global warming, consequently results into so many disastrous effects. This includes drought, excessive rainfall and respiratory ailments (Galore and Weil, p 810). This charcoal burning is also capable of directly affecting the environment because it results into soil degradation. Global poverty also turns out to be an environmental problem because, many people do not get to meet their basic needs (Galore and Weil, p 815). This in itself is an environmental crisis because it is the failure to construct a sustainable environment t for human life. The United States national security strategy demands of them to build a balance of power bearing in mind that each country, whether small or large, has its fundamental responsibilities. Moreover, to affect this, it resolves to pioneer aspirations of human self-respect (Galore and Weil, p 820). With the implications that global poverty has on the environment, it is high time that the United States recognize it as an environmental problem. Its effects on the security are also wanting. This is because; due to poverty such people do not get access to adequate education hence termed as the illiterate. With no employment that comes with no skills and little employment activities, it leaves a large room for indulgence in destructive activities. An excellent example is the poverty in the African American community of the United States (Galore and Weil, p 25). With no education that guarantees no education, it is no wonder that they participate in violent crimes. All these considered it will be of the essence if the United States considers entrenching global poverty into the national security Policy. It should thus be considered as United States National security issue. Population, Technology, and Growth This article explores the model through which population, technology and growth can be fitted to come up with a functional and economic legacy. With three regimes that have lived to characterize the economic development, it is essential that these steps be fairly understood. This will be beneficial to map out the possible transitions’ and have a clear understanding of what the future presents to the world in the economic sector. In a situation where the progress in technology is slow with a growing population, there is a likelihood of reduced rise in output growth (Sachs and Sewell, p 34). This means s that the high numbers of people consume more than what technology can provide them. This is because technology is meant to make man, s work easier. However, if this technology is limited and the people are increasing, which means, an increase in demand, there is the likelihood that there will be no economic growth. This fits the supply demand chain where an increase in demand purports that there be an increase in supply, otherwise, it will be an economic crime. Among the Malthusian regime, post Malthusian and modern growth regime, post Malthusian regime is the best. This is because it preserves the positive relationship that has to exist between income and population growth (Sachs and Sewell, p 42). This is because a robust economy should meet the needs of the population as well as make profits. This is because it only absorb s a part of the output growth while it leaves the rest for keep. However, the modern regime growth negates this. This is because; a sustained growth in income is possible with a reduced population growth. However, it depicts a steady growth in both income per capita and the levels of technology. An excellent example can be that of China after the First World War. With reduced numbers of people after the First World War and a crumbling economy, there was a want for more of the populace to help build the economy. The government, therefore, invested in advocating for families to bear more children. This had a positive outcome with a rapid rise in economy 20 years later. However, the explosion has begun to be explosive in spite of the one child policy they adopted. There have been calls for feasible measures to control this growth, for, with time, it will affect the economy. That is why regulated increases in population and a rise in technological advances are a surety for sustained growth of income. This research of economic models presents to be challenges especially to economists who are seeking to understand growth and development issues for the betterment t of the economy. This means that the unification of behavior of income per capita as well as, the relationship between this income and the rate of growth of the population is extremely valuable (Sachs and Sewell, 50). This means that in as much as the population maters in the economic growth, so is the per capita income but in relation to the technological services available. In as much as much as many countries would want to have a modern growth regime, it is bound to fail at some point. This is because, of its in stability in the context of more human resource, more work output; for even the rapid change in technological changes requires man power to run them to affectivity. This will be an effort in trying to limit the involvement of technology in most activities. This is because such a regime is likely to turn the man’s mind into a robot like with no say. This can be disastrous when it reaches an age where the world is controlled by machines. References Galor, O. and Weil, D. N. Population, technology, and growth: From Malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond . The American Economic Review.2000.Vol.90, No.4, pp806-828. Sachs, J. and Sewell, J.Commentary: Should global poverty be a US national security issue. (Part 1 and Part 2). Woodrow Wilson International Centre for scholars. Retrieved on 29/2/2012 from: Read More