The Concept of Existentialism - Essay Example

Existentialism Existentialism refers to the 20th-century viewpoint and philosophy that focuses mainly on investigation and analysis of the existence and of the approach or way humans discover themselves existing on the earth (Thiele, 34). Friedrich Nietzsche’s existentialism dwells on the idea that people live or exist first and then each human being spends a lifetime varying their essence or personality (Solomon, 24). In easily comprehensible model, existentialism is a branch of philosophy related to finding true self and the entire meaning of life via free will, entailed choice, and an inclusion of personal responsibility and accountability. The philosophy reaffirms the said ideology that people are continuously searching to discover who and what character or personality they are throughout existence as they formulate choices basing on experiences, varying beliefs or even outlook recurrently in life. It further recognizes that and individual choices become exceptional without the inevitability of a purpose form of truth. A model existentialist ideology compel the belief that people should be enticed on forced to opt and be accountable without the assistance of laws, designed ethnic rules and inclusive traditions (Michelman, 73).Existentialism questions the existence of mankind stressing on his origin and reason for existence Existentialism undertakes several main factors and concerns in the field of philosophy including the essence of entailed human free will, corresponding nature or ability of human true nature selection through life choices. It inherently considers that people and best to function at maximum ability if they struggle against their personal nature and fighting for life intensive options or entailed decision making and crucial disregards are not devoid of stress, repercussions or even consequences. There is crucial comprehension of the facts that some things are usually not rational and individual accountability, responsibility and discipline is typically crucial. The philosophy also intensively acknowledges that society is aberrant, and its conventional religious and worldly rules are arbitrary including the acknowledgement that worldly desire is futile. Another typical broad definition of existentialism refers to a variety of entailed concepts as there is usually no solitary answer to it entails yet it does not sustain any of the subsequent information (Solomon, 28). According to Friedrich Nietzsche, there is critical approach and regards for factual connotation that wealth honor or even pleasure designs the good life and inclusion of social values or even structure manage and control an individual. There are huge and compelling regards for people to accept what life. There is extreme observation that the science makes everything improved and people are fundamentally good but defiled by society or outdoor forces. Conventionally, there exists a wide assortment of theoretical, religious, philosophical and political models of ideologies that constitutes existentialism but there is no universal agreement in a subjective set of ideals and entailed beliefs as politics differ, but very typical model seeks the mainly individual autonomy for people inside a culture (Michelman, 79). Historically, existentialism has had an impact on society as existentialist ideas and ideology came out in a period of the society when there was a profound sense of desolation after the Great Depression and consequent World War II. During this time, there was a fortitude and spirit of an elevated optimism in culture that was destroyed and annihilated by World War I and corresponding mid-century disasters or calamities. This hopelessness has been properly articulated by earlier existentialist philosophers well to the 1970s and were currently continuing to the current day as a popular way of judgment and entailed reasoning. The ideology has been propelled with the freedom to select personal preferred moral system of belief and inclusion of lifestyle. In the past most existentialist was devout moralist, an amoral atheist or agnostic relativist for instance, Kierkegaard, was a religious philosopher while Nietzsche was an anti-Christian and Sartre was majorly an atheist (Solomon, 29). History affirms that human life is never complete and completely satisfying since suffering and loss that normally occur while considering the absence of perfection, control and power exhibited by various people on their life. The earlier existentialist affirms that while life is not optimally contenting or satisfying, it nevertheless has a compounded meaning. The function of the existentialism entails the search and corresponding journey to denote and discover true self and true individual sense in life. Most prominently, it is normally arbitrary that identifies existentialism as it tries to find the most objectionable for instance when a person or society attempts to compel or demand that their own beliefs, rules or entailed values be devotedly accepted or inherently respected and obeyed. Typically most Existentialists consider typical acts to destroy individualism and drive people to conform to anything whatever the populace in power wishes thus they are increasingly dehumanized or even reduced to essentially being objects. Existentialism normally intensely stress that any persons decision is the determining feature for what is to be understood or believed rather than by correspondingly secular world values or arbitrary religious models (Michelman, 78). Existentialism inquires on reasons as to why man exists on earth surface, the established value of mankind, the main typical intrinsic values of mankind, the purpose served by mankind and many other details relating to the essential purpose of mankind on the surface of the earth. The solutions and answers to the provided questions quests on man’s ability to determine the scope of their essence on the world’s surface. Since an individual is a segment of the world, how does an individual perceive or view the world as that normally determines people treat and view themselves. It is hence imperative that human race resolve these elementary questions and correspondingly it is usually paramount that people discovers the candid truth. The recognized starting point of the philosophy commences from the ideology of the question on God’s existence. The answer to that question equally presents answer to various other huge questions quested existentialism (Solomon, 86). According to Friedrich Nietzsche, there are two key sub-divisions of (existentialism) comprehensions refereeing to atheist or theistic both acknowledging whether God is present or not present in any undertakings on human existence on earth’s surface. According to atheist’s understanding, if God is not present or doesnt exist, then life must have originated through some ordinary unintelligent, and impersonal, eventually a meaningless development. That indicates human beings ultimately as pointless, senseless as the very method or process which brought them into existence and thus life is just a misfortune similar to the existence of mankind. People can locate short term reasons and importance of living on earth since because the parents desired to have kids but eventually people are merely an accident and similar to their parents and it appears that Life is a single huge and enormous accident. There is extreme understanding that people serve no purpose and thus do not have any cause or lasting effect as in categorization life assumes a grand scheme of entailed things accumulating to eventual recognition of life as utterly meaningless. In an absence of a creator, there was nonentity around to place a person on earth with a purpose that indicates that people are on earth without a reason, and that is simple (Thiele, 34). On contrary, the theistic worldview dwells on if God really exists, that indicates He is a definitive reality. The understanding reaffirms the essence of creation of mankind as the sole reason as to why he exists on the surface of the earth. The worth of mankind is hence determined by God according this particular belief. In accordance with this understanding what God says is precise is entirely precise and what He articulates as wrong is understood as enormously wrong. Consistent with, the understanding allows people to select to be right or wrong by being empowered to act as moral agents and thus undertake moral decisions but God makes the ruling regulations but the entirely running question is whether He will one day implement of enforce the laws. Philosophers normally affirm that in an absence of an absolute God to undertake or create rules, there is actually no comparable issue as moral absolute, but there are only preferences. It further reveals that a person do not have any right to continue living but hence prefer dying. Another person on the other location might feel the need to kill you disregarding how you presume it (Solomon, 56). In conclusion, both theories on an existence of mankind are questionable thus every individual is hugely left to pave his own way through the challenging attempt to denote his origin through. In entirety, God will at last hold every person responsible and accountable regarding the moral decisions and the prevailing instinct amongst the majority appears truly notable that God will ultimately hold people accountable. It is recognizable that most people powered by instincts know that a single day oncoming they will explain all the dreadful things they have conducted and thus leads to the essential understanding of moral absolutes. The overriding point is that incase God does exist, eminent terms like “justice," "morality" or "purpose," are typically not abstract notions and thus God has a reason for creating every individual. Works cited Solomon, Robert C. Living with Nietzsche: What the Great "immoralist" Has to Teach Us. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. Print. Thiele, Leslie P. Friedrich Nietzsche and the Politics of the Soul: A Study of Heroic Individualism. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1990. Print. Michelman, Stephen. A to Z of Existentialism. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press, 2010. Print. Solomon, Robert C. From Rationalism to Existentialism: The Existentialists and Their Nineteenth-Century Backgrounds. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2001. Print. Read More