Immanuel Kants Solution to Human Problems - Research Paper Example

al affiliation Immanuel Kant’s Solution to human problems In this discussion, it is important to start with a little history about Immanuel Kant. Kant was a German philosopher who lived in the 18th century. Immanuel Kant was born on 22nd April 1924 and globally recognized for his contribution to the field of philosophy. Kant developed basic principles of life through the study of philosophy, and he used this area for the advancement of his thoughts. Kant majorly based his arguments on human experience and morality. Immanuel Kant noted that most of the human life rotates around morality and that morality is the primary goal of the existence of a human being. In Kant’s arguments, he spoke of the concepts that structure human experience. Kant termed the perceptions that structure human experience as fundamental concepts. On the topic of morality, Kant argued that there cannot be any morality without reason. Kant paced reason as the driver towards a morality motivated life. Immanuel Kant stated that reasoning was the basis of human existence, and moral being should embrace logic for a peaceful and well-developed life. Kant is an individual who had a foremost influence in the present day thinking and practice. Kant had an imperative knowledge in the field of metaphysics, ethics, esthetics and political philosophy. The knowledge that Kant had in the above fields was a particular strength and motivator towards coming up with his findings on human experience. Kant’s experience in different areas of philosophy enabled him conduct his research from different perspectives. Kant, therefore, came up with enough prove to support his argument. Kant’s argument is considered one of the building stones in the modern society because morality and human experience are some of the infinite features of human existence. Immanuel Kant, therefore, remains an important figure up to today, due to his advancements on the requirements for human life in the modern contemporary society. Exposition On the concept of priori judgment, Kant had several observations to make. Kant stipulated that there were two types of propositions; analytic and synthetic propositions. Priori judgment is also known as analytic experience. Analytic judgments are perceptions or concepts that can be said to be true by virtues of their meaning. Kant explained that some ideas of thought needed minimal explanations. The ideas purely express themselves without the need for the further course of reasoning (Kant, pg. 44). Such prepositions are referred to as analytic because their analysis does not necessarily mean it has to be related to any tangible or observable evidence so that they can be confirmed to be true or false. Synthetic propositions, on the other hand, can be argued to be true if their meaning has a reasonable relation to the real world. Synthetic propositions have to make sense in relation to the world activities, occurrences or events. On the basis of the two types of schemes, philosophers have argued for the existence of any difference between them. Some of the philosophers have stipulated that there is no observable difference while others have stuck to the differences mentioned above. The differences are, however, less significant in this project as Kant bases his arguments on priori judgments. The basis of this research project, therefore, is to identify and explain the reasoning behind Kant’s questions. The questions that Kant brings forward are significant developments in the contemporary life. Identifying the issues and being able to answer them will mean a perfect life in human experience and morality. Human problems in the modern society are a major setback towards the course of reasoning. Kant identifies human problems as the disruptive idea towards defining the objectives of morality. The essay, therefore, is aimed at establishing the causes of the human problem and identifying the solutions to the human problem. The article will come up with conclusive ways of solving the human problem, based on the thought and teachings of the philosopher Immanuel Kant. The presented passage can be said to be the basis of Kant’s arguments. The passage explains the central themes in Kant’s arguments, and analyzing the passage will bring out reasoning behind Immanuel Kant’s observations. The key terms and concepts in the passage include the value of good will. Kant defines goodwill as the idea of cause. The concept of cause is what drives a human being into doing what is right and what is wrong. An action cannot however be termed as goodwill if the intentions are driven by wrong reasons. In the passage, Kant describes that good will can be used to define the validity of what is right and what is wrong (Kant, pg. 68). The concept of ‘what happens’, according to the passage, is the reality behind every thinking, reasoning or action. Kant, therefore, describes the concept of ‘what happens’ to the major judgmental factor towards the action of the human being. The other question Kant raises in this argument is the difference between hypothetical and categorical imperatives. Hypothetical Imperative can be said to be any order that is based on given conditions. The order in the above passage is raised by the question of meaning something that is different from the standard. Kant asks a question of how one can say or do something that can be argued to be of good will, and yet is not contained in the order of imperatives. The actions of a person all depend on the line of human thought, and the consequences of an action depend on human judgment. The other critical issues raised in the above argument are the universal law. Kant raises the question of what should and what should not be accepted in the universal law. The universal concept of thought can be said to be the line in which all individuals should base their reasoning. If the idea of thought is corrupt and based on bias, it cannot be defined as universal. The passage, therefore, brings out the importance of comprehensive thinking and the morality and human experience behind it. Kant describes the situation on what actions can be termed as moral, immoral or evil. Kant describes that some actions are done out of inclination, and such actions cannot be judged as to be moral or immoral. The given passage, therefore, explains how activities that have no real or moral worth can be treated. The puzzle of whether or not such situations can be termed as evil remains imperative. The given passage, therefore, describes the human experience in terms of moral worth. In this argument. Kant does not only answer the questions, but also provide a logical explanation for the case. Kant answers these questions by the use of simple arguments, based on the facts of human experience (Kant, pg. 86). Kant also carries out psychological research that makes him come up with viable findings to his questions. For example on the question of universal law, Kant argues that any perception that leads to perfection in morality can easily be identified universally. Kant’s answers respond to human problems by addressing the primary cause of the human problem, morality. Kant provides basic principles on how to live a morally upright life, and how actions can be judged as moral or immoral. Comparing Kant’s and Hume’s arguments, analysts describe that Kant became more successful in addressing the issue of human molarity than Hume. Hume did research and tabled findings on ‘An inquiry concerning human understanding’, which does not necessarily reflect the causes and solutions to the human problem. Kant, on the other hand, investigates the human problem and according to him, the solution is the morality in the society. Unlike Hume, Kant has brought up the solutions and the road towards a universal morally upright reasoning. Critical discussion Kant has adequately addressed the issue of human problem, which some his predecessors could not. The suggestions given out by Kant are easily understandable and applicable. As argued above, the human problem has been caused by morality attributed to human experience (Kant, pg. 67). Therefore concentrating the efforts on morality is the primary solution to solving the human problem. Kant brings out a comprehensive report on how to improve human morality and reasoning in the light of human experience. The main strength of Kant’s argument is that he has based his suggestions on the issue of morality. Kant has therefore brought extensive findings on how to improve human morality (Kant, pg. 79). Kant’s results cover a wide variety of human life and experience, therefore making it the most suitable argument in the contemporary life society. Another strength of Kant’s argument is that the findings and suggestions are relatively easy to apply and do not involve complicated procedures. The discussion is however based on the supposition that morality is the only solution to the human problem. That is the primary objection to this argument, considering that there are other factors that could have contributed to the human problem. Kant would have addressed this issue by viewing the human problem in a wider perspective, and coming up with comprehensive solutions to support the morality perspective. It is highly possible that Kant’s response would turn out successful. Viewing the human problem in a wider perspective would provide solutions that are long lasting and effective, despite the angle at which the human problem is seen. Conclusion The argument on Kant’s response to the human problem is very relevant in the modern society. Implementation of Kant’s suggestions will improve on the human problem solutions. The above argument, however, raises the new question of whether morality alone is enough to solve the human problem. Works cited Kant, I. (2015). Critique of Pure Reason, A270/B326–A278/B334 (excerpt). Consciousness in the Physical World: Perspectives on Russellian Monism, 19. Read More