Philosophy of Science (follow on piece) - Coursework Example

Philosophy of Science It would not be correct to suggest that astrological data is well defined. For example, there are different approaches to determine the role of each planet and sometimes they might contradict. What is more important is that each approach is simply based on tradition that a group of people adhere to. That is why there have never been any experiments that would verify the data.Speaking of different local interpretations, one might suggest that none of they can be perceived as the true one as they make assumption that are based on nothing.

For example, the European astrologists pay more attention to planets and their supposed influence on the people, while their counterparts in Ancient Egypt were more concerned with constellations and attributed the similar functions to them.If an astrologist practices this science in such a way and comes to such remarkable results, then surely the latter should be taken into close consideration and carefully examined. However, even such remarkable fact will not be able to prove that astrology in general is a real science and many people who practice it before did not care to perform such experiments and were not strict about their scientific investigation.

As for a shift in paradigm of astrology, it is true that sometimes sciences discover fundamental facts do not need more proof. However, in case of astrology, one might suggest that there has not been hardly any proof of its postulates. That is why if a careful investigation is done, the alleged influence of the planets might need to be redefined.