Non-identity problem and the ethics of climate change - Essay Example

The incoming research will prove our current choices should not deter the pace of development since nature has a way of providing its recipients. As such, humankind should stop taking responsibility of non-identity problem. According to scientist, when it comes to climate change, the future generation will depend on the decisions we make now. However, these decisions are made by a few who happen to own or control the authority. The adoption of neither regime will result to distant successors leading lives, which are not worth living.

Convincingly, it appears that the adoption of Kyoto protocol over-contraction and convergence will not result in any particular future persons that are harmed so long as we hold that harmed person worse off than it would have been had the harming actions, which were performed. Reflectively, choosing Kyoto Lite would benefits more members currently as well as, future generations that will require extensive sacrifices of the contraction and convergence that will require developed countries to reduced the well being of different persons.

The underlying argument is that if we believe that ethics and justice are identities which dependent on the structure, then the actions of that particular believe might change over time. To defragment the above statement logically, we invite the non-identity problem. Non-identity problem questions our duties to future generations. As noted, duties to these descendants whose identities are beyond our current influence are those which instruct our current behavior. Justifiably, the Kyoto protocol grounded its identity on independent goals such as utility maximization or the perfection of the human species.

However, there are deontological concerns and objections that are applied to explain the wrong-doing in such cases. These are the intentions and state of mind of policy choosers. Reflectively, since-oriented or the identity