What Law Should Be Implied - Assignment Example

First and and Number Due (DD/MM/YY) What law should be implied? Law is usually a system regarding guidelines enforced by the legislatures to regulate habits and govern behavior. Law is usually created by legislatures through laying out of guidelines and this results with statutes, the executive as result of decrees and regulations of even judges as a result of binding precedent which is normally in accordance with legislation jurisdictions. Law should offer protection to those individuals who in good faith, disseminates information regarding wrong doing and also mismanagement. It should also create powerful bodies that are independent which will have the mandate to review any refusal that might emerge regarding disclosure of information. R. Bork, in his work, Inconvenient Lives, argues that taking the life of an individual deliberately has never been considered as a matter regarding meaningful indifference. Abortion has now been turned to be a constitutional right, and this clearly indicates the attitude towards life by the society is on a sinking ship. It is an indicator of radical individualism and a development in public immorality. Many abortion supporters fail to understand that taking the life of a fetus is killing a human being with a potential. It is often crucial to persist in moral respect despite the circumstances (Ashton 34). This reality brings about moral anguish, yet it’s a certainty that such acts are grave wrong. No arguments justify the killing of helpless humans, not even overpopulation. Abortion can never be smothered through the use of euphemism. All terms are inadequate to describe the ending of an individual’s rights. In this context, terms such as medical procedures and reproductive rights are most inadequate. Those who seek the right to commit abortion to prevent a future harm are no different to those who plan to sin on the basis that they will plan to seek redemption afterwards. There is no justification that corresponds to this. There is no necessary evil (Pell 320). The burdens that may accrue later in future does not justify taking the life of a person. Putting the child for adoption after birth could help solve the dilemma. Abortion can never serve as a technique for birth control. One can never kill for convenience purposes, or even contemplate in the creation of embryos to be destroyed in research or even consider removal of organs from living babies. That is crossing the lines by disregarding human life. Ellen Willis, in his work regarding Abortion Backlash reproduces a very scarifying police photo of a deceased woman botched of an illegitimate abortion, who lies nude in a bare room. Temporarily, it seemed like that image was diminishing, which may possibly pass to history. Suddenly, it is vivid and stunning. On 20th of June, 1977, a number of Supreme Court justices settled that Connecticut and Pennsylvania needed not to pay for abortions with the Medicaid funds of the states. In 1969 feminists had already began making public demands that abortion laws be repealed. Abortion was legally unacceptable except under very special circumstances. There was a legislative debate on reform of abortion and this was confined majorly to the issue of mentally sick women or even cases of rape to be liberated from forced child bearing. Later the political climate had changed drastically and abortion was permitted for the first six months of pregnancy and any laws prohibiting this was violating the constitutional right of women to privacy. The limits of the decision was put to test when antiabortionists pushed for a new set of abortion statutes requiring consent from the husband or the parents and also forbid the making use of public finances to fund abortion. Despite the fact that any laws that support abortion by any means neglect the moral aspect, it is not wise at all to commit abortions as it comes with it the detrimental effects. It leads to cervical cancer and ovarian cancer, uterine perforations, cervical slits, difficulties during labor and subsequent preterm deliveries, handicapped newborns associated with later pregnancies, risk of ectopic pregnancies. It also causes the pelvic inflammatory disease, Endometritis which is a post-abortion risk that majorly affects teenagers, immediate complications. It lowers genital health and contributes to long term reproductive damage. We cannot also compromise the psychological factors the come along with abortion, these include feelings of stigma, suicidal ideation and even suicidal attempts, increased drug abuse, post-traumatic stress disorders, chronic relationship problems and even divorce. Racial preference cannot be morally justified. It acts as an instrument of current injustice since it has been used by an increasing minority to access professional careers. This has devastated the self-esteem of the victims and the value placed on them by others. It is notably correct that racial preference occurs mainly in employment and in higher education. Giving people advantage over others just because of their origin or racial preference is wrong. Law should forbid anything that is immoral. Unfair, and selfish. I refute the argument supporting race preference which states crucial human actions such as the choice of friends, though morally doubtful, should be supported by law. Roger Wilkins (95) in his work regarding poverty and race said that affirmative action should be taken by institutions in order to develop plans that will enable them to go beyond the usual business and search for qualified individuals despite the race. Denial of racism is equivalent to the denials that accompany drug addictions or even gambling. The need to designate affirmative action was to alleviate the bad conditions faced by many blacks and Latino women. Affirmative action was designated not to punish anyone but it was an attempt to enlarge the opportunities of everyone. Discrimination did not only hurt the blacks but the entire nation at large as it resulted to a lot of rioting and demonstrations. Through the development of affirmative action, there were more realistic criteria by institutions and enterprises that set to diversify the mix of people that were qualified to engage in such businesses. Plans for good faith efforts and more so the setting of broad numerical goals that many institutions wanted would start by taking the affirmative actions. Affirmative proved to be a difficult issue since it engages both the blacks and the whites precisely at the various points where they seem to differ most. Though the blacks and the whites inhabit the same atmospheric space, their experiences are very different and they seem to operate in different spheres. The whites seems to be possessed by a sense of ownership of the land and this problem is largely alleviated by the policy of affirmative action. If proprietors and managers use affirmative action in association with government contracts, they first inspect their workforce to realize how many and in what positions people and women of color are engaged. They compare their outcomes with numbers of people and women of color who may be anticipated to be in a fair-minded applicant pool. The making unique efforts to ensure equal chances for members of groups that may subject to discernment--includes advertising positions and scholastic institutions, dynamic recruitment, attention to employment, exceptional training programs, and admissions procedures to avoid discrimination. making special efforts to ensure equal opportunity for members of groups subject to discrimination--includes advertising positions and educational institutions, active recruitment, special training programs, attention to employment and admissions procedures to avoid discrimination. A major goal of affirmative action has been to work towards equality of opportunity in situations where racial and gender-based discrimination exist. In recent years, achieving diversity has also been seen as an equally or possibly more important goal. Often affirmative action was adopted as a voluntary policy to increase opportunity for disadvantaged students or to achieve the benefits of diversity and, like the powerful Mississippi river, racism can be violent and deadly and is a permanent feature of American life. But while nobody who is sane denies the reality of the Mississippi, millions of Americans who are deemed sane -- some of whom are powerful and some even in terms of thoughts, deny either in whole or in part, that there is existence of racism. If we intend to continue making situations better in this society, we would better figure out ways to shield and defend affirmative action against the mixed up, the worried, the manipulators and, yes, the liars in politics, journalism, education and wherever else they may be found Works Cited Ashton, ”They Psychosocial Outcome of Induced Abortion”, British Journal of Ob & Gyn, 2010.Print Chester W. Hartman, Double Exposure: Poverty & Race in America, (2008) John McWhorter, “It Shouldn’t be Good to have it Bad”, 2006. Print Blair, Roger D., and D. Daniel Sokol. The Rule Of Reason And The Goals Of Antitrust: An Economic Approach. SSRN Journal n. 2012, Web. Cudd, Ann E. David Boonin, A Defense Of Abortion :A Defense Of Abortion. ETHICS 116.4 (2006). Web. Racial Disparities In Preferences And Perceptions Regarding Organ Donation. J Gen Intern Med 0.0 (2006): Web. Pell, Terence J. “Racial Preference and Formal Equity.” Journal of Social Philosophy 34.2 (2003): 309-325. Print. Read More