Surrogates Philosophy - Essay Example

In this regard, Eva kitty's cognitive disability, Carol Levine’s s recipients-care gives relations, Martha Nussbaum, Jeff McMahan, and Peter Singer’s attributes in the description of meaning and significance of surrogacy about cognitive disabilities is worth understanding. Conversely, based on their ideas generated, ethical issues, virtues, and the bestsurrogate practice are defined though in a different version (Christiano & Christman, 2009).
            On a broad analysis, Eva Kittay describes the cognitive disepalous on to surrogacy descriptive meaning andsignificance as a growing awareness that incorporates moral status and the theories of justice directly to address thementally abled individuals and their caregiver-related issues. Ketay supports his stance in favor of Carol Levine’s caregiver and recipients’ relationship to demonstrate the meaning and significance of surrogacy in healthcare systems. For instance, Ketay advocates for health practitioners to act with surrogacy in handling challenged individuals and respecting their rights as human beings (Kittay & Carlson, 2010). However, Levine supports Kettay’s argument butwith a different version expressing the best health care practice that legal guardians for the cognitively disabledindividuals should be given a mandate to such as signing treatment consent before treatment. Similarly, the sameapproach was used by Bruce Jennings’ capacity preservation and restoration of communication and personal identitykind of assistance for dementia patients by the community and family members (Levine, 2013).
            Comparative Martha Nussbaum bases her argument on a distributive justice of social contractive theorypointing out the importance of caring for the cognitively disabled individuals in making performed choices. Forexample, Nussbaum supports the importance of surrogacy by building a form of human dignity for the exceptionalities within the education systems in ensuring inclusive learning for the mentally challenged individuals for capacitylearning building. Similarly, Levine concurs with Nussbaum's jury seron voice and voting rights for cognitively disabled individuals. For instance, political issues and criminal responses for mentally impaired individuals can be assisted to make a judgment by their guardian when their personality judgment is impaired (Christiano & Christman, 2009). However, Michael Berube disagrees with Nussbaum's ideas basing his argument on the theory of moral justicepointing out the need to protect the rights of equality for all human beings. Hence, cognitively labeled individualsshould be treated as equal to healthy individuals.
            The integration between moral and intellectual capacity as advocated by Jeff MacMahan and Peter Singer evokes the emergence of multiple ethical issues that might challenge surrogate implementation. In this regard, unsolved ethical issues arise within the critics and amateurs of cognitive disabled argumentative context that result from the level of determining and defining informed decision-making or voluntary consent (Kittay & Carlson, 2010). Similarly,ethical issues arise from employing the surrogates as a subject in conjunction with determining vulnerability as infidelity ethical issues. For example, issues related to self-centered initiatives and autonomy within Kettay andLevine's argument results in values and virtues that mean to be a good caregiver.
            According to Kittay and Levine’s arguments supported by facts and evidence, a good surrogacy is achievedwhen there is always a willingness to care for the cognitive and the disabled individuals. In addition, a good surrogacy occurs when the surrogates can care and have enough resources to initiate and implement the care. However, there must always be personal and family sacrifice that ensures all the virtues recallable and moral aims guidelines that monitoredassess the caregiver's ability and responsibilities (Kittay, 2013)