Summarize Sidgwick's Hedonism and the Ultimate Good - Essay Example

Summary There is a dilemma in replacing the happiness with wellbeing of human being in the society. The definition of wellbeing is compared with an arch without a mark. It is considered as being with the promise of the future being. On the other morality consist of habit and sentiments merely a code of restriction. In the modern time the demand of human beings are expressed in the culture. It the cultural practices that help us to define. The idealists have divergent opinion how pleasure is derived.

Pleasure depends on the knowledge or the beauty in its diffident forms or certain ideals of the human relations that have ultimate good. The hedonistic argument against assumption of the objectives as the ultimate good. The argument is divided into two parts. The first one is immediate intuition of reflective and the second one is the comprehensive comparison ordinary judgment of mankind. There is emphasis on the second point in that pleasure is derived from the ideal goods. The ultimate end of these may be pain or pleasure.

A strong argument has been proposed that pleasure as a feeling is intuition which cannot be conceived as rational action. It is the amount of pleasure derived from the object that is the standard for deciding between alternative of actions. Happiness is the aggregate of the possible engagement in the future. What is surprising about this is that pleasant feeling cannot be quantified. The feelings cannot be added neither is removed and therefore it appears challenging. The two views are given to so that the reader can take the position for or against the hedonism as the ultimate good.