Traditional Philosophy of Logic as Ignoring the Concerns of Women - Essay Example

Radical philosophy Radical philosophy Nietzsche Nietzsche, as a post-enlightenment philosopher, challenges the moral society by explaining the evil of absolutism. Absolutism is a moral view that emanates from the feudal society but still it finds its way into the middle ages whereby rationalism has permeated. The master/slave morality is consistent with Nietzsche loss of faith in the religious world. Slave morality is based upon rejecting the trueness of life and attaching oneself to the values of an unseen world. Nietzsche attributes this phenomenon to Platonic metaphysics, Judeo-Christin world, and liberal democracy. These traditions are nihilistic in the sense that they deny an actual life as the will to power. In additions, they create a moral of order of evil and good that applies to everyone in spite of individual differences. In this sense, evil is what contains harm to the masses. Nietzsche, therefore, explains that the salve morality pushes an individual to condemn one’s strengths and ignore one’s basic instincts. Master morality is the savior for the individual suffering under the yokes of slave morality. Nietzsche explains master morality as having the control over one’s own will to power (Nietzsche 116). This means ignoring the will of the absolutist world thereby living according to one’s personality and instincts. Master morality means egoism that devotes to self-elevation. The self becomes the center of life and it deserves glorification and constant nurturing. In this sense, the only good thing is that that enhances the feeling of power in a person. Master morality supersedes the traditional definition of the good and the evil. The death of god seeks to detach the person from the mystical world. It is crucial to highlight that Nietzsche supreme view of concrete life guides most of his philosophical thoughts, including the death of god. The philosopher points out to an invalid eternal world and highlights the demise of subjective values that have unfortunately become the mode of contemporary life. This is not necessarily an act of contempt towards the idea of Supreme Being, but it seeks to liberate the individual from delusions. An individual becomes free to articulate one’s life according to individually set morals. This is a path to fulfillment since a person commits to the life that one sees rather than be detained by a moral order that is inconsistent with the concrete needs of the individual. Transformation from all values refers to redefinition of morality to suit the individual disposition. It involves detaching oneself from the overrated moral order and forming new morals that respect the power of life. In this sense, the individual remains faithful to the concrete life on the Earth and participates in self-mastery. Nietzsche seems to speak to every normal person who he feels is under the oppression of subjective morality. He also believes that traditional standards continually detaches a person from the soul. This invites affliction because the person lives according to the will of others rather than live according to the will of the self. Besides, he believes most individuals do not have the freedom to live according to the principles of the self because there is a consistent system that enslaves people. In the end, he highlights that the contemporary society suppresses strong-willed people and elevates the meek ones. In essence, Nietzsche informs the oppressed, the abused, and the weary people that they can become in charge of their fate. Simone de Beauvoir proposes that human beings are radically free. Radical freedom relates to the idea that a person becomes in charge of one’s own fate. She bases her existential philosophy upon Hegel’s viewership of the human being as an embodiment of consciousness. In this perspective, in as much as human beings are exposed to the influences of nature, individuals are still aware of themselves (Beauvoir 301). This consciousness enables human beings to achieve limitless possibilities. However, a person faces the conflict between the self and the other. This creates a conflict within an individual’s self-consciousness. Besides, Simone de Beauvoir develops her existentialist ethic by rejecting abstract and rational conception of the human being. Simone believes that a human being lives at the individual and subjective level defined by given fears and desires. The human condition has the freedom that allows human beings to make unique choices. Radical freedom means that an individual possesses the liberty at self-creation. In essence, existentialist ethics accords an individual the responsibility of defining one’s own existence. Furthermore, the meaning of life forms at the individual level, as the society does not impose an abstract moral standard upon the person. In defining the ambiguity of ethics, Simone espouses the inherent existential premise, existence precedes essence. This means that a person first exists and encounters the world until one is able to define the essence of one’s existence according to unique experiences and internalization of those experiences. Simone highlights the difference between material things with a pre-determined essence and beings without a pre-determined but are able to define one’s existence through decisions and actions. There is ambiguity in the idea that a human being uses one’s past to determine the future. Given the future is unknown, the full impact of an individual’s decisions upon the future cannot be properly estimated. In addition, human beings also experience ambiguity in terms of their dual nature. Simone believes that a human being is split between matter and thought. In as much as human consciousness relies on the body, it is conceptually different from it. Human beings possess the ability to surpass their material build in thought, but lack the ability to escape the same. In this mode of thinking, highly attributable to feminism, the society has the tradition of prioritizing one aspect of existence over the other. For instance, tradition superimposes the spirit over matter, the collective over the individual, and self of the other. In this sense, she highlights the oppression of women which resides that a woman’s existence is heralded as relative to that of a man while a man’s existence is absolute and independent of a woman’s existence. The society, therefore, oppresses the woman because it does not allow her to define her existence according to her desires and needs. A human being in the woman’s situation cannot attain fulfillment because she cannot meet the needs of one’s instincts. It is an ethical act to will one’s freedom because it lifts the individual towards limitless possibilities. Such an act liberates the individual from the oppressive moral structure of the society. In the existential sense, an individual becomes free from the eternal and subjective world. In this sense, the individual defines the morality that suits one’s perceptive and life. Following one’s desires is a path to fulfillment. In addition, it gives a person the full responsibility of managing one’s life. The individual does not rely on an external face to change one’s circumstances. Mary Daly defines ecology as the intricate web of interactions between organisms and the environment. On the other hand, gynecology is the treatment of diseases that are unique to women. The Gyn/Ecology debate highlights the idea of men as oppressors. This occurs from the fact that most gynecologists are men. This fact demonstrates that men have historically tried to suppress women by controlling language. The mind doctors, body doctors, and soul doctors accord women their own interpretation of women’s wellbeing at the expense of the perspectives of the women themselves. Metapatriarchy refers to excessive of domination of the female by the male whereby the men believe that they won the society. Metaethics is a system of study that makes out a pattern of patriarchal perspectives that manipulate language and uses myths to fit the world into the male’s domain (Daly 321). This undertaking also criticizes traditional philosophy of logic as ignoring the concerns of women. Metaethics solely concerns itself with women’s welfare since they have received little out of human civilizations. It, therefore, redefines logic, philosophy, religion, and science to fit into the woman’s perspectives. Daly argues that it is illogical to contest for equal rights in a society whose existence thrives upon inequality. This is radical feminism that redeploys the benefits of civilization to the woman because she has received significant oppression from the male-driven society. Women, instead of being devoted to the human race, should commit their minds and efforts towards themselves. This means that they take extra responsibility for honoring themselves as a different ethnic group. This is not an attempt at suppressing men, but at emphasizing that women deserve themselves as much as men have manipulated the world to benefit themselves. In essence, Daly views the world as inherently ignorant of a woman’s existence. The society, therefore, treats the welfare of a woman as secondary to that of men. In using the Greek mythology stories, Daly highlights the case of female characters who are manipulated to build the male’s world. A woman should, therefore, liberate oneself from the traditional definition of the very ethics that does not give value to her existence. She must create a world that befits her existence and benefits her fellow kind, other women. In turn, a woman cannot rely on men to initiate and sustain this radical feminism because she best understands her situation. References Friedrich Nietzsche. World ethics. Pdf. Mary Daly. World ethics. Pdf. Simone de Beauvoir. World ethics. Pdf. Read More