Descartes Method of Doubt - Essay Example

Descartes' Method of doubt formed on the notion that all conceptions and truths can be viewed as uncertain and questionable (Dicker, 4-5). He doubted everything even the existence of God, nevertheless he considered atheists as the benighted people (Watson, 226). Descartes claimed that the sense of perception could be the source that definitely should be doubted as our feelings were a subjective dimension of sensation. He was perturbed that people had regarded senses as a basic source of beliefs. It was constant for Descartes that only approved facts could be seen as a general truth in the world.

Philosopher declared “if I wanted to establish anything at all in the sciences that was stable and likely to ask” and “I want to discover any certainty” (Dicker, 1). That statement was viewed as Descartes’ goal due to the perspective of the Method of doubt discovered by him.

All knowledge was examined as related ones and they needed to be built on solid and reliable facts from our field of experience. Descartes represented an undeniable example of his respectful ideas. He argued that the process of thinking was a cogent one as this was a continuous proceeding. Such implication was related to every subsisting person. “Cogito, Ergo Sum” which means, “I think therefore I am” was considered to be Descartes's principle notion (Watson, 232). What was more a big number of his investigations were constructed on this profound idea.

He intended to accomplish the idea that no existence without factual confirmation occurred in our dimension. Investigations in the field of philosophy regarded Descartes’ ideas as rather skeptic ones. They sounded radically and unilaterally in some perspectives which were why the concept of skepticism was regarded as characteristic of Descartes’ philosophical notions. It should be mentioned that veiling of skepticism was present in his thinking. However, Descartes himself did not regard his concepts as skeptical ones and claimed that he “had refuted skepticism” (Watson, 232).

All in all, it was impossible to overestimate Descartes holding in the field of philosophy. This scientist with his Method of doubt represented a new perception of the world and us in it. He believed that only approved notions had a right to exist and regard senses as a doubtful source of perception. The idea of thinking as the basis for the subsistence of a person was demonstrated in his method. Although his ideas were viewed as rather skeptical, they were serious and momentous due to the philosophical perspectives.