Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1642548-analyze-a-passage
https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1642548-analyze-a-passage.
When God told man to subdue the world, He meant that he should improve the world for his benefit. There was still enough and good enough left. However, man’s enclosure for himself left very little for others to use. The author gives a few reasons in support of his thesis. For instance, he says that if someone leaves as much as another man can make use of, does just as good as the one that has taken nothing at all.
He goes further to say that labor was the title for the land that God gave to mankind. However, if one meddles with what has been improved by another man’s labor, it is arguable that he has desired the benefits accrued from another man’s labor. According to the writer, this is wrong because each man should labor for his gains. The reasons the author gives to support his thesis. He emphasizes man’s greed and rebukes those that desire what is not rightfully theirs. The reasons are plausible in their right.
This is because when God created man and commanded him to till and subdue the earth, he intended that people should live in harmony. However, man’s greed increased and he annexed what was initially common for all men. This passage has a significant role in the rest of the world. The author mentions an example that serves to remind people that common land is not individual land. He says that even in England, or any part of the world, within a government, no one has the right to appropriate or enclose any part without the consent of the rest of the people involved.
Read More