Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1640122-can-beauty-be-in-more-than-one-object-at-one-time-explain-universals
https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1640122-can-beauty-be-in-more-than-one-object-at-one-time-explain-universals.
Can Beauty be in more than one object at one time? [Pick the The beauty is difficult to define due to the fact that beauty depends on personal likes and dislikes. Augustine questions if we find things beautiful because they make us happy, or whether we get happy because we find a certain thing eye catching; he chooses the second (Augustine, 1953). An individual may say that beauty is in perfectly symmetrical features and another person might differ by saying that beauty lies in a good heart. Any quality of a thing or person that may attract can be defined as beauty of that thing or person.
Since there is no particular definition of beauty then it is not impossible to find beauty in two objects or person at the same time. For instance, a person finds roses very fascinating and among animals he likes horses or peacocks. If he finds a peacock in a garden full of roses he will find both of them equally beautiful. Berkeley’s (1732) idea of beauty is “Everyone knows that beauty is what pleases” ; it is quite possible to be pleased by two objects at one time. Beauty shares strong bond with love, if you love two objects or individuals equally they will look equally beautiful at the same time; a perfect example is love of a mother.
Normally mothers find all of their children equally beautiful and they can never make up their minds which one looks more beautiful. In a nut shell, beauty can be in more than one object at one time. It depends all upon personal interests.ReferencesAugustine. 1953. Earlier Writings, J.H. Burleigh, ed., New York: WJK Publishing. Berkeley, BG. 1732. Alciphron: or, The Minute Philosopher, London: Tonson and Co.
Read More