Nobody downloaded yet

Anselm's Proslogion, Chapter II--The Ontological Proof of God - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
There are several variations of the argument proposed by various philosophers and theologians – but the purpose of this thesis is to analyze…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.4% of users find it useful
Anselms Proslogion, Chapter II--The Ontological Proof of God
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Anselm's Proslogion, Chapter II--The Ontological Proof of God"

Download file to see previous pages However, to maintain the position, the atheist would have to add another attribute, that of “existing in reality,” to supposedly make it the “greatest possible being”. It is just as if someone had claimed 7 to be the “largest possible number”; you could always add a number to make it greater. And when an atheist does add the attribute of existence, then he is no longer an atheist. This is a brief summary of the ontological argument.
The immediate response this argument received was from Gaunilo of Marmoutiers, a Benedictine monk, who predictably flipped the tables and applied the same set of arguments to prove the existence of the Lost Island, in order to demonstrate how the argument is fundamentally flawed. However, the argument was critiqued on the grounds that the very concept of “the greatest conceivable being” does not apply to Islands, or any objects as such, and that it applies to God alone.
One of the popular criticisms of St. Anselm’s argument is theological, proposed by St. Thomas Aquinas in Summa Theologica, who questioned the soundness of the initial premise of Anselm’s argument, stating one cannot possibly know the essence of God; ergo it is beyond humanly possible to adequately consider that premise. He also strikes a major blow to the first premise, pointing out that not everyone necessarily conceives God to be the ‘greatest possible being’, seeing that some have believed God to be a body. The criticism leveled by St. Thomas Aquinas was so strong, that it was said to have laid the argument dormant for centuries.
David Hume also leveled a criticism against cosmological argument in his work Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, which broadly applies to the Ontological Argument as well. Hume stated that existence of something cannott be established based on a priori reasoning. And whatever we ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Anselm's Proslogion, Chapter II--The Ontological Proof of God Essay”, n.d.)
Anselm's Proslogion, Chapter II--The Ontological Proof of God Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1639097-anselms-proslogion-chapter-ii-the-ontological-proof-of-god
(Anselm'S Proslogion, Chapter II--The Ontological Proof of God Essay)
Anselm'S Proslogion, Chapter II--The Ontological Proof of God Essay. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1639097-anselms-proslogion-chapter-ii-the-ontological-proof-of-god.
“Anselm'S Proslogion, Chapter II--The Ontological Proof of God Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1639097-anselms-proslogion-chapter-ii-the-ontological-proof-of-god.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Anselm's Proslogion, Chapter II--The Ontological Proof of God

Ontological Arguments and Belief in God

...?Answer Anselm of Canterbury proposed the first ontological argument. His proposal suggested that God is the greatest possible being anyone can think of. His suggestion was that the greatest possible being has to be present in real form: someone who actually really exists is surely much greater than the one of whom a person can only think of in his head. His argument, however, was wholly rejected by Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas’s suggestion was that there is no way that mere mortals can conceive what God’s nature is, and thus we surely cannot conceive God like Anselm has said we can (Oppy 122-3). Therefore, this argument can be used only by...
9 Pages(2250 words)Assignment

The Ontological Thesis: Anselm, Kant, Descartes and a Touch of the Buddha

...intellectual side of the fence, and refute those who are not. Kant, on the other hand, took freedom from thought restraints, and his devotion to human autonomy, as a responsibility. He was not afraid to publish “The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God” (1763) and also provide an elegant rebuttal to Anselm’s ontological argument about proof of the existence of God. I like that. In “The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God,” Kant elegantly argues that the existence of God pre-dates God’s possibility and the world’s possibility...
13 Pages(3250 words)Thesis

God has Ontological Existence

...proposes that the moral Law and Order in this world is alive and exists because of God who has bestowed human beings with this understanding of morality. According to the Ontological Argument, the God is the greatest being, imaginable, one of the aspects of greatness and perfection is his existence or in other words as God can be conceived that means he exists. Twelfth century theologian and philosopher Anslem developed this argument about God’s existence. This argument proves about the existence of God through abstract reasoning. Descartes in his Meditation 3 proposes about the Ontological existence of...
2 Pages(500 words)Term Paper

Proof

...not be a cinematic success, but will definitely make a valid conversation starter. Though being intermittently interesting and sometimes even gripping, the movie is eventually utterly slow, stagey and more of a cinematic disappointment. The direction of the movie vividly stands out as being uninspired and shoddy. Certainly it stands out as being the worst of all movies discussed in this paper. Though each of the movies discussed in this paper has its own peculiarities and some movie may seem good to an audience, irrespective of the negative comments made about it, yet, Proof, Hamlet and A Few Good Men stand out to be the most outstanding of all the movies discussed in this paper. References Adler, S....
3 Pages(750 words)Movie Review

Analysis of the Cartesian Proof for the Existence of God

...accomplish this? He subscribes to the ontological argument, originally of Saint Anselm, a Benedictine monk who was the first to offer a rational proof for God’s existence. Anselm argues that to have an understanding of God as that than which nothing greater can be conceived, entails the acceptance of God’s existence since such a conception necessitates existence. He states: Therefore, if that than which nothing greater can be conceived, exists in the understanding alone, the very being than which nothing greater can be conceived, is one than which a greater can be conceived. But obviously, this is impossible. Hence,...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

St. Anselm / St. Aquinas - ontological/cosmotological argument

...St. Anselm St. Aquinas – ontological cosmotological argument The ontological argument was first formulated by the Archbishop of Canterbury, St.Anselm who was also a Doctor of the Church. The ontological argument is a philosophical debate and one of the most strangest and debated of the proofs. Philosophers like Immanuel Kant and G.W.F. had reviewed the argument though the former attacked Anselm’s proof while the latter defended Anselm’s proof. Anselm’s proof is notable since this is the only argument that claims to establish the existence of...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

The Existence of God Presented by Anselm and Aquinas

...The Existence of God Presented by Anselm and Aquinas St. Aquinas presents an argument that there are entities in theglobe that are in motion. This implies that things are transforming and that what is in motion ought to have been set in motion by one more thing that is already in motion. The grand Catholic thinker, theorist, and theologian Aquinas embraces that, what is in motion has to be set in motion by one more, as well as that, this cannot continue to infinity, since, in that case, there would be no initial mover. Therefore, St. Thomas presents the argument that, for elimination to be the endless chain of shifts, there has to be an initial mover and basis of every motion, God...
2 Pages(500 words)Personal Statement

Anselm of Canterbury

...Anselm of Canterbury: The Ontological Argument and the Perfect God. Anselm’s Ontological Argument in the “Proslogion,” attempting to prove the existence of God, hinges on his definition of God as “something than which nothing greater can be thought of” (Anselm, 359). This definition of God as the ‘greatest’ mandates a conception of God as Omnipotent, Omniscient, and Omnipresent: the Perfect God. Anselm conceives of God as perfect; if this conception is rejected, Anselm’s argument falls...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Reflective Chapter Entry II

... Nonverbal Communication Nonverbal communication is easy to believe and convince than verbal communication. Concepts of nonverbal communication that may help in communication include: a) Body movements- this concept helps to communicate by giving gestures to illustrate what you mean. b) Facial expressions-this concept is helpful in communication by showing emotions and receiving quick feedback, response or reaction to information. c) attentiveness- being attentive in non-verbal communication is helpful because all information is recorded and understood clearly. Hearing means receiving information from a source, or a sound. An example is when someone hears something that someone else has said, or a sound from a certain device... Nonverbal...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Proof

...1. I don’t get it. Some people are always jealous in their attitude towards others, because they have what they don’t have. They tend to make rumors(gossip) about others, because they’re not happy in their life. Well, for most of these people the priority is either watching TV. When the movie they’re watching is sad they become upset and gossip about other people thinking that they’re clean and never did anything stupid in their lives. They judge others and think that they’re perfect creatures… Other people are sorry of themselves, because they are fat and always bitching about their body but they’re not doing anything except putting food in their mouth and complain. Look, if you’re not happy with your life right now, maybe you... I don’t get ...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Anselm's Proslogion, Chapter II--The Ontological Proof of God for FREE!

Contact Us