Karl Marx Ideology of Fetishism - Essay Example

Marx defines the Fetishism ideology into themes. He first states that the exchange value of a commodity depends major on the labor used in its production process. When determining the value of a product one will tend to use the commodity to compensate for the labor. The commodity in his ideology is dependent since it relays on what efforts are invested in terms of labor.

He also explains the social relationship between producers and eternal factors. He shows how different producers relate despite the difference in the commodities they offer in the market(Wood, 1970). He uses the relativity of the products to create a personal concept of the market. For instance, one who makes tea and sells directly relates to who bakes cakes and bread. He finally states laboring activities control the activities of a product. In a real-life scenario, the exchange of commodities follows the concept of Money- Commodity- money.

This means that one sells a product to generate more money and utilize it to make offers and expand productivity. Karl Marx on the other hand explains that money is replaced in its commensurability with human labor (Wood, 1970). Thus, his structure is Commodity- money- commodity. Different from this the fetishism ideology with real life is the fact that labor used while producing does not necessarily reflects the product. In that while, producing one may fall ill and hence spends resources in treating himself hence the final product will not reflect the number of resources used in the production.

Socially it clearly shows how the people's relations in the production line as the case of the tea maker and the cake baker clearly shows a contrasting relation different from what Marx stated. They fail to relate in terms of the exchange value in that they independently fix the value without considering how the other person will react (Wood, 1970). In this scenario, the producers are always objectionable. Marx’s choice of concepts makes him an ideologist since what real life offers is different from what he defines.

People may choose to adopt his ideologist which gives room for scrutiny and criticism. This characteristic makes him an ideologist. He defines personal statements and supports them with examples. The concept makes his ideology creates an environment that researchers use as the base of their research. The uniqueness of Karl Marx in expressing life issues classifies him as an ideologist. He singles out concepts and combines them to create an ideological argument.