Darwin Natural Selection - Essay Example

One of the primal questions that mankind has sought to answer is with regards to from whence they came and whether or not they have a specific purpose to fulfill or are merely a random collection of biological matter that will pass away upon death from both memory and reality. For many centuries, mankind turned to religious interpretations of various sorts to explain the origin of life and give it a definitive meaning. However, within the past century and a half, the theory of evolution, put forward and expounded upon eloquently by Charles Darwin, has come to define the way in which the majority of the educated and learned individuals within society integrate with an understanding and appreciation for where life originated, how, and to what end such a life should serve. Although rather well defended, this particular theory is replete with flaws, non-sequiturs, and a litany of other logical failings. As a means of shedding a level of inference with regards to this particular topic, the following analysis will seek to discuss the moral of the nations of Darwin’s fear he of natural selection. One of the issues that creationists and individuals that believe in intelligent design point to as a shortcoming of natural selection is with respect to those organisms or systems that are highly complex and in which partial inadequacy of function would preclude natural selection. One such system would be that of the human eye; arguably one of the most complex mechanisms that exists within nature. However, Darwin, and those that support him would point to the fact that the need to see would be evidenced through many of the different states of eyesight that exist from the most basic caterpillars to the most advanced mammals. Although it is true that the theory itself exist on something of an extension basis, the understanding and believe that the validity and truth of the statement ultimately exists as a function of its existence, there are a number of moral parallels and understandings that can be constructed via immoral understanding of specifically what Darwin’s theory entails. From such a baseline of understanding, the analyst can and should note that the existence of natural selection necessarily precludes any higher power or any need for such a higher power within the world. Although this is quite obvious, the impacts of this particular level of understanding are found. Without the four a higher power, morality and another itself is constrained only with regards to the way in which humanity seeks to buy morality within the current context. In other words, natural selection in and of itself is a process by which furtherance of species is sure by the natural and “blind” process that nature engages to select those which will most likely carry on genes further the process of reproduction. Within such a context and understanding, it is clearly and obviously the reader that there is little if any need for requirement for a level of moral purpose and/or understanding. Effectively, and integration with Darwin’s theory of natural selection necessarily encourages the reader to come to an appreciation of the fact that the ends by means. In fact, such an interpretation is powerful due to the fact that no constraining norm of reality is encoded within the understanding itself. Comparatively, as the author notes in the piece in question, Christianity, or theistic belief in general, denotes a clear and actionable level of moral culpability with regards to the life endowed to the humans upon the earth. The point of such a level of analysis with regards to this essay, as well as the paper which is being analyzed, is to draw the attention of the reader to the fact that not only does theistic creation have an actionable and important claim to being able to define the way in which life on planet Earth sprang into existence, it also represents the clearly superior moral fabric/framework by which the practitioner of such a set of beliefs can come to understand the moral consequence of the world that they live in. Ultimately, the piece in question was able to engage the reader with a level of understanding of analysis with respect to a rarely discussed compound of Darwinian evolutionary theory; morality and the means by which it can be expressed within such an understanding. Although it is possible that Darwinian evolution may come off as a well honed theory by which the existence of life on planet Earth can be put forward, it falls flat on its face with regards to the level and extent to which is able to integrate a moral understanding of the world and the means by which the individual interacting within it should behave. This comes as price of the analyst due to the fact that Darwin evolution in and of itself is primarily unconcerned with the level of morality that it encourages/puts forward within tacit and interact meanings attributed to its application. It is not the purpose of this analysis to dictate that the theistic interpretation of intelligent design is without its faults; rather, it should be understood by the reader that faults that are included within theistic intelligent design do not show any direct or indirect evidence of shortcomings with regards to their moral application. Within such an understanding, the reader can come to the clear and definitive understanding that the validity and use of any theory of origins must engage not only with the scientific approach that is concentric and focused upon the applicability and rigor that can provide, it should also integrate with a clear and definitive level of moral reasoning. Work Consulted Forrest, Barbara, and Paul R. Gross. Creationisms Trojan horse : the wedge of intelligent design. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. Print. Read More