Nobody downloaded yet

Evaluate feyerabend's argument that society needs to be defended against science. to what extent does science deserve the specia - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
SOCIETY NEEDS TO BE DEFENDED AGAINST SCIENCE Name: Course: Professor: Institution: Location: Date: Paul Karl Feyerabend; Society Needs to be Defended against Science Introduction Paul Karl Feyerabend was a philosopher of science born in Australia. He is famed for his contribution in philosophy while working as professor in University of California, Berkeley where he worked for thirty years (1958-1989)…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.1% of users find it useful
Evaluate feyerabends argument that society needs to be defended against science. to what extent does science deserve the specia
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Evaluate feyerabend's argument that society needs to be defended against science. to what extent does science deserve the specia"

Download file to see previous pages In these two books, he expresses and defends his ideas on the nature of scientific methods, concluding that there are no ground rules on governing scientific methods. He opposed the idea of having a single rigid scientific process to which all scientific research is carried out with the argument that this would make science predictable thus denying it the opportunity to evolve (Feyerabend 2000). In this study, Feyerabend shows that new findings in science, on which theories are later founded, have enormous influence from past events, theoriesand facts. Scientists researching in a new area of study do not only apply old scientific methods in fresh observations but they also observe the field under study under the mental influence of old theories and already existing facts. To this effect, much of their findings will be subjected towards what they already know in this field, such that their new work appears to marchnew observations to old facts and while improving them to come up with new theories. This process shows high levels of falsification in science, where scientists will do anything to defend their theories and ensure that they fit in with significant facts to avoid dismissal (Feyerabend 2000).With these and other arguments, Feyerabend uses philosophical facts and methods to show reasons why the society should be defended from science. This paper evaluates Feyerabend’s argument that the society should be protected from science, and the degree to which science warrant the special epistemic status it enjoys. The paper achieves its aim by looking at science and society, and then narrows down to the effect of science on eduation and religion. Through this, this essay will cover the need of protecting the society from science and the significance of science in such areas, which warrant its use in them. Science and Society- Scientific Methods Feyerabend developed an anarchistic philosophy of science. Anarchism is a political philosophy in which all forms of state authority are viewed as undesirable and unnecessary. Anarchists advocate for a free society that is based on voluntary participation in activities, and freedom of association between individuals and groups. Anarchism involves opposing the influence of authority and hierarchies that affect human interaction within a society within a state. These societies advocate for a society with no hierarchies and have no influence from state institutions. Feyerand advocated for separation of the state from science in the same manner that religion is detached from the state in the modern world (Feyerabend 2000). He envisioned a society where all traditions have equivalent treatment with equal privileges in accessing attention and central power. The period of the late 90’s was when science was honourable and viewed as a great privilege. Scientific facts were treated with great reverence to the point where individuals sacrifices their traditional and cultural believes Feyerand thought that too much credit was given to science in a situation where the society was not fully equipped with enough information and facts on the true nature of science. The society was therefore, exposed to science without proper information on the traditions, theories and functionalities of science. This was done since it was a new ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Evaluate feyerabend's argument that society needs to be defended Essay”, n.d.)
Evaluate feyerabend's argument that society needs to be defended Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1476076-evaluate-feyerabend-s-argument-that-society-needs
(Evaluate feyerabend'S Argument That Society Needs to Be Defended Essay)
Evaluate feyerabend'S Argument That Society Needs to Be Defended Essay. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1476076-evaluate-feyerabend-s-argument-that-society-needs.
“Evaluate feyerabend'S Argument That Society Needs to Be Defended Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1476076-evaluate-feyerabend-s-argument-that-society-needs.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Evaluate feyerabend's argument that society needs to be defended against science. to what extent does science deserve the specia

Science and Society Questions

..., for example, in the origin of sin. The creationists believe that Adam and Eve’s disobedience to God is the origin of sin in the world, while evolutionists deny this fact. To the creationists if there is no concept of sin, human beings would not be responsible for their actions, a factor which will disintegrate the society. The creationist present Noah’s flood as part of their evidence, and believe that, the discovered fossils are as a result of the floods (Darwin 108). Question 2b Is Creation science is a legitimate science? To answer this question, there is a need to define science. Science is a process that uses methods which are...
16 Pages(4000 words)Essay

Critically evaluate feminist arguments against the present system of science

...? An Evaluation of Feminist Arguments against the Present System of Science of Introduction Feminist arguments againstthe present system of science focus on a science not habitually or consistently considerate to women’s interests. Most feminists share the same opinion that in western culture gender is a very important aspect determining social norms, laws, human relationships, and individual behaviour. The second-wave of feminism examined how male-centred, male-dominated societies marginalised and disenfranchised women, both to identify and abolish gender inequalities (Lederman & Bartsch, 2001). The movement also argued that science, besides perpetuating inequalities between sexes, is excessively focused on rational positivism... , and the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Does Science Threaten Religion

...in many cases argues that science was the cause of sin in the world. According to the church science tend to explain the deeper concepts that had been put in writing in the bible. This diverts people’s attention away from the church and thereby reducing their faith. The churches believe in their holy books as the ones that have the real and bona fide message from God and do not need anyone under the sun to neither dispute nor test in any way but should rather believe and do as it is indicated .The understanding of the word of God to the church is therefore non-negotiable and meaningful with no reasonable doubt. Scientists also have their argument that there exist some...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Science

...scientists believe that biotechnology will play a major role in many fields, including food production, waste disposal, and medicine. ECONOMICS Economics may appear to be the study of complicated tables and charts, statistics and numbers, but, more specifically, it is the study of what constitutes rational human behavior in the endeavor to fulfill needs and wants. We can say, therefore, that economics, often referred to as the "dismal science", is a study of certain aspects of society. Adam Smith (1723 - 1790), the "father of modern economics" and author of the famous book "An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations", spawned the discipline of economics...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Science

...SODIUM A. What is Sodium? In order to understand what sodium is all about, it is important to discuss its physical properties, chemical properties and other related information. Discovery Humphry Davy discovered sodium in 1807 after his discovery of potassium (Senese, par. 2). The electrolysis of caustic soda (NaOH) paved way to the discovery of sodium (Gagnon, par. 3). The discovery of sodium was not alone as an element but as a compound joining with other essential elements. It was through chemical means that sodium was successfully separated from combining other essential elements. Physical Properties Sodium is one of the most commonly known elements found in the periodic table. Found in Encyclopedia Britannica (sodium, par...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Science

... Sur Supervisor Energy Sources for the Future The worlds most energy needs including that of theUS are currently being met through fossil fuels such as gasoline, diesel, natural gas, and coal. Moreover, reserves of hydrocarbons are depleting fast all over the world. Most studies suggest that they cannot last more than 50-60 years. Further, the biggest disadvantage of fossil fuels is that its increasing consumption leads to global warming and environment degradation. In this perspective, it is crucial to find alternative sources of energy to replace fossil fuels for our needs. The paper aims at exploring solar energy as a best alternative source of energy along with some of its drawbacks and possible improvements that can be made... in Japan...
4 Pages(1000 words)Admission/Application Essay

Philosophy of Science

...Wadiyah Al-Alwan Prof. Christopher Curran ENGL-1033-15 March 21, Philosophy of Science Feyerabend’s perspective on the concept of science can be viewed as being radical by most science philosophers. However, I strongly agree with his argument that science is an ideology that we must preserve society from based on the arguments in the section below. To start with, the comparison of science with religion clearly demonstrates that science does not stand up against religion. This means that scientists end up changing their facts when experimental evidence going against them comes up (Feyerabend 57). Overall, no scientific theory survives over an extended period of time. Secondly, his ideas on scientific imperialism are viewed as being... ...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Science, Technology, and Society

...Chapter Summary Chapter Summary Chapter Science, Technology And Society (STS) Introduction The Chapter of the textbook is d as Science, Technology And Society (STS) and in this chapter the author focuses on STS and how it has impacted the society (Markert, 2010). The chapter even covers definitions of technology and compares the constructs of science and technology. The chapter is divided into three sections including the introduction section in which the author discusses technological advancements and the impact of this technological advancement. In the next section the author focuses on the definition of technology and tries to...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Science

...Science Violence There are some underling relationships of the existing variation in the belief in conspiracies investigated in a sample of Americans who have reached the required voting age including violent overtones of conspiracies. After literature review, it is evident that violent could be the negative consequence of conspiracies. This may be due to a variety of conspiracy theories which are heightened by confirmation bias and also motivated reasoning. This leads to the demonization of certain out group leading to violence being considered as necessary. Oliver and wood medical There have been numerous theories of conspiracy in the past surrounding public health matters. The research conducted revealed that medical...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Science versus Pseudo- science

...Science versus Pseudo- science by The of the The of the School The and where it is located The Date Science versus Pseudo- science It may be particularly important to compare and contrast a science and a pseudo-science. A suitable example of the former is astronomy: it operates with a data which can obtained by different probes and can be collected by people without any special equipment which can may everyone a researcher; people in different countries were able to come to same conclusions regarding astronomical phenomena; finally, it brings useful consequences for the world as with the help of it satellites are developed. Contrary to...
1 Pages(250 words)Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Evaluate feyerabend's argument that society needs to be defended against science. to what extent does science deserve the specia for FREE!

Contact Us