The Term Generosity - Essay Example

Wealth itself is a neutral entity, if used properly can be a boon, if mishandled can turn into a bane. Its usage depends on the kind of people who possess it and their intention and actions how they utilize them. In such circumspect, it is the mark of a nobleman to spend than desire to save and possess that makes him a gentleman. This in return earns them praise, accolades and soft corners in different sections. Virtue is a painless act, rather a peace earning act that blesses the soul. The righteous individuals would leave less to him and give more to others.

The degree to which an individual gives away with respect to self earnings and self-possession hold more ground than one who may possess more yet donate and give away less. Without regard for self accumulation, if the donation is given away, it holds more ground than any other case of noble intention. Richness in true sense in one when one gives away rather than possession of material goods.

The consideration of giving away to the right kind and right type is also a very important factor. It must be ensured that the recipients are fully worthy of it and deserve to be granted in the name of charity and virtue. The timings of donation and giveaways are also vital since small donations in time of need are more valuable than large donations at times when they are least needed. This noble realization establishes a sense of self-scrutiny in an individual and restricts him to the righteous path only. Source of donation and earning is also a factor determinant of a noble cause.

Spendthrift and miserliness is a double evil element, and imbalances of either extreme poles, one serving for deprived livings and lifestyle, while the other stands as extra lavish spending which in other words is wastage of resources and elements. While spendthrift is termed an outer bound, miserliness is a least bound below the nominal line on which the activities should be undertaken. These two factors are not mutually inclusive and may occur as a contrasting element with one occurring at a time only (Kass,151). However, spendthrift is at times given the edge and goes past the radar unnoticed for at least he contributes in a certain way, while the miser individual in no measure contributes whatsoever. Certain factors are highlighted which may bring the spendthrift individual to a desired and ordered borderline zone. These factors can be that of loss of pecuniary element or the souring of digits in the life span column.

The miser is deemed as sheer ignoble and despicable only because he does not contribute in any way, does not yearn to solve the troubles of people, nor does he take any concrete action to help the downtrodden, underprivileged section of society who through may be faced with the turbulent circumstances. Yet the spendthrift cannot be exempted and they do stand nearly guilty as the misers for their sources may not be genuine and may have come from a source that is not preached by the book, ethics and laws. The diminishing of their own armoury possessions leads them to adopt means which are against the rules and against the grain of nobleman.

These two serve as deviances and detractions from the desired path line. This can be mended through guidance, counselling, and right path determination and instruction along with the sense of benevolence and mankind welfare establishment amongst the people. Miserliness is more replant than spendthrift and it would need serious steps to get rid of their inner menace that obstructs the man’s goodwill from helping the fellow beings. Hence the element of miserliness stands as anti-parallel to the noble cause of human welfare and upbringing in the social sphere.