Nobody downloaded yet

Is killing animals , or making them suffer, for human ends morally defensible - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Is killing animals, or making them suffer, for human ends morally defensible? People have always needed animals for various reasons for the sake of either necessity or convenience. I believe animals exist to help humanity survive and get by with life with less hardship as possible…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91% of users find it useful
Is killing animals , or making them suffer, for human ends morally defensible
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Is killing animals , or making them suffer, for human ends morally defensible"

Download file to see previous pages My opinion extends to other human activities that put harm animal which are not necessary, such as poaching or game hunting or animal fights. There is a fundamental moral principle which permits us to share a kind of equal treatment that concerns all human beings and with every kind of differences that exist between and every one of us. I believe that this moral code is not only limited to human beings, but also to other living sentient beings in our environment. I believe that respect for life even extends to non-human living organisms and that animals have every right to be treated with much care and equanimity as we do with a fellow human being. Even if non-human animals are lacking superior and complex rational faculties and capabilities compared to humans, their existence is something to be valued and not to be brushed aside so brusquely. If one were to look at it, an average person would rather dismiss the issue of animal rights while not being able to sit down and swallow the problems of racial discrimination. The reason behind this is that people in general, most of the time ignorantly or unintentionally, have speciesism as part of their mindset. Speciesism could be defined as the belief that one kind of species among all other members of the group is more superior to the rest, therefore the rationale for dominance, subjugation or annihilation of the superior specie against the more inferior. In this case, humanity has seen itself at the highest pedestal of the food chain. Singer made this observation on speciesism in this manner: This attitude reflects a popular prejudice against taking the interests of animals seriously - a prejudice no better founded than the prejudice of white slaveowners against taking the interests of their African slaves seriously. It is easy for us to criticise the prejudices of our grandfathers, from which our fathers freed themselves. It is more difficult to distance ourselves from our own views, so that we can dispassionately search for prejudices among the beliefs and values we hold. What is needed now is a willingness to follow the arguments where they lead, without a prior assumption that the issue is not worth our attention (55-56). I would now come to think that if animals were in the same level as human beings, perhaps in the eyes of a Higher Being such as God, animals were and are still the most abused group of organisms on the Earth. Yet, most of us human beings are not too concerned about this because there is either lack of care or concern. It can be said then that the lack of compassion is what kills animals by human hands. I think there is more to that than just a lack of care for life, something that is more logical. For example, If a person were to be asked whether it is better to put a human being or an animal as a test subject for a scientific experiment that could find a cure for a deadly disease and save millions of lives, would it be certain to say that the person would choose another human being to be put under the knife than an animal? Even if the person being asked was an animal lover or animal rights advocate, I most certainly doubt that any psychologically normal person would choose another human being in a heartbeat. People would rather have an animal go under the experimentation instead since it human beings have more attachment and concern for another human being than an animal. I will not be a hypocrite to say that I know any better about this matter. If being asked the same question, I would ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Is killing animals , or making them suffer, for human ends morally Essay”, n.d.)
Is killing animals , or making them suffer, for human ends morally Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1436065-is-killing-animals-or-making-them-suffer-for-human
(Is Killing Animals , or Making Them Suffer, for Human Ends Morally Essay)
Is Killing Animals , or Making Them Suffer, for Human Ends Morally Essay. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1436065-is-killing-animals-or-making-them-suffer-for-human.
“Is Killing Animals , or Making Them Suffer, for Human Ends Morally Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1436065-is-killing-animals-or-making-them-suffer-for-human.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Is killing animals , or making them suffer, for human ends morally defensible

Making Friends & Making Them Count by Em Griffin

...?Making Friends Making Them Count) by Em Griffin Introduction: Making Friends Making Them Count) is a book written by Em Griffin, where he tried to survey the art of friendship through his thoughts on how one person can be attracted to another, how self concept and self esteem can affect or improve relationships, how impressions are formed, and how friendships can be maintained for long lasting times. Through the book, Em explained the necessity to understand one’s own self, understand the other person in relation with him, and understand both together to give meaning to a relationship and form a bond. He stressed on the factors of interpersonal communication, perception, and motivation, and how all these issues may have impacts... on...
7 Pages(1750 words)Term Paper

Non-Human Animals

...from philosophical and physicist backgrounds. There is evidence, however, of mental states like the soul, depending on physical aspects of humans. If someone accepts this fact then they would be accepting dualism, i.e. the belief of mental aspects depending on non-mental aspects. However, by the end of his life Descartes accepted that animals can suffer bodily pains. The next important fact of difference Descartes had with the Scholastics was his rejection of the theory that all facts must come from feeling. The Scholastics were dedicated to the Aristotelian principle that everybody is born with a spotless slate, and all that intellect material must be felt. Descartes,...
4 Pages(1000 words)Term Paper

Animals

...for the cat, it does not require training to behave in a certain manner, unlike dogs, which might develop unwanted behaviors if not trained in a particular way. However, it is the obedience and respect, which dogs and cats are trained to portray towards their masters that make them the best pets (Radford 80). Among these groups of pets, cats also happen to have a personality that is closest to that of human beings. For example, cats’ communication is also a lot easier to guess compared to the other pets. Among the kinds of pest, dogs and cats are more intelligent, with cats scoring higher than dogs in this context. What is more, the cat is also cleaner than the other pets, more so dogs,...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Human and animals Cloning

...of abnormalities in a large group. Furthermore, as cloning is a process where exact DNA replications are made the method of cross breading would seize to exist. This is important as Cross breading would make people to diverse and thus develop. Then again uses of spare part organs are in scrutiny too. Many people don't believe that one should use and embryo for organs. (Deb, 323) However the aspect of Cloning in Agriculture supports the use of cloning as streamline of Clone Elites would likely lead to mass production of transgenic animals where no safe guards are put on animals once it is able to produce protein. The quality of the products would also be taken into account as in cows the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Oscar Newmans Defensible Space

...of intervention, as well as being able to identify how to minimize and control risks, or potentially transfer them to a different environment. In relation to linking and incorporating the theories of SBD and Defensible Space into Risk Management practices is fairly straightforward. The concept of risk management is the ability to ultimately be able to control crime in a certain situation. This in turn fosters a whole variety of SBD associated tools including surveillance; closed circuit TV cameras and private security. Newman's theories around Defensible space characterize our overall appreciation of what is determined by private and public. If a space needs to be privatized in...
14 Pages(3500 words)Book Report/Review

On killing

...become bounded to be associated to the victims, gained experience with them, recognized their dissimilar identity and aim, and finally terminated their association either through killing or releasing these victims (ibid, p.160). Therefore, religious, cultural and social similarities can enable a stoppage to mass killings or war by the groups. To eliminate instinctive human bond and to eradicate the sentiments of harming one’s own kind, the subjects or targets have often been portrayed as low form of life. Therefore, their physical distinctions have been signified as valid reasons to kill these most insignificant form of life (ibid, p.161)....
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Is it morally defensible for doctors to offer treatments that will enhance human capabilities (mental or physical) Discuss

...Moral ethics and treatments that enhance the mental and physical human capabilities of patients Gene therapy and moral ethics Introduction Gene-therapy is an experimental technique that utilizes the genes to prevent or treat disease (Burley and Harris, 2002). Researchers assert that gene-therapy will allow the doctors to treat a medical disorder by inserting a gene in the patient’s body cells instead of using the traditional methods of surgery or drugs (Wartburg and Liew, 1999). Some of the approaches of gene-therapy include replacing the mutated gene that is responsible for the disease with a healthy gene (Becker, 2000). Another approach entails inserting a new gene in the body in order...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Mercy Killing or Just Killing

...that humans are sacred creatures, and thus, only God can choose the end of a person’s life (Snyder 58). In this case, committing euthanasia is an act against God’s will and is a sin. Belief in the sinfulness of euthanasia, as well as variations of these beliefs, is shared almost all religious faiths in the world, including Muslims, Jews, and Christians. Although euthanasia is a more complex issue among Buddhists and Hindus, who argue that the practice is an ethically acceptable act in particular circumstances, Buddhists and Hindus do not universally support this argument. A different argument, an alternative argument, contends that no reason whatsoever should make an individual feel that...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Crime Prevention through Environmental Design

...evidence by a temporary fence made from sticks (Crowe, 1990). It can explain the security of the place is enough, and no need for concrete wall and also this is a rural setting (Newman, 1996). In photo 8, mechanical concept is applied. The windows have a protective glaze with reinforced metals bar from inside and doors with materials that are difficult to break through. This technology makes crime a difficult thing to commit (Smith, 1996). Reference Newman, O., Rutgers University. & United States. (1996). Creating defensible space. Washington, D.C: U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research. Smith, M. S., & National Institute of Justice (U.S.). (1996). Crime...
1 Pages(385 words)Essay

The Relationship of Human Animals versus Other Animals

...that involves animals are very important. The food industries and also the animal research facilities, perform critical activities that enhance the living and economic conditions of humans (Richter 1106). The concept of animals being brought up, for the benefit of economic sectors and scientific research, should embrace appropriate approaches that minimize cruelties. The concept of entirely raising animals through utter misery is not desirable (Tell 81). The animal rights activists strive to make the society understand the living conditions of animals, and to enhance those conditions. Rosemary acquires...
5 Pages(1250 words)Article
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Is killing animals , or making them suffer, for human ends morally defensible for FREE!

Contact Us