Categories of Legitimate Reservation - Term Paper Example

Categories of Legitimate Reservation In every field of work, specialized knowledge forms the basic requirement for the person to work efficiently, either individually on in groups. Decision-making and logical thinking are the other factors that are quite important in any business setting. Logical thinking is inherently significant, because it allows an individual to rest assured of the fact that his or her decisions are sound. During any process, a number of people are certain of a few established materials, known as facts. They also make certain hypothesis about a particular thing or a process, and the result of the relationship of facts and hypothesis come together in a conclusion. However, every scientific experiment needs validation. The Categories of Legitimate Reservation are those set of rules, which validate or invalidate the relationship and connection between facts, hypothesis and conclusions. Their roots particularly lie in Aristotle’s logical fallacies (Dettmer, 2007). Broadly speaking, the purpose of the categories of Legitimate Reservation includes testing the validity of the cause and effect trees (Dettmer, 2007). The paper shall attempt to describe the eight categories of Legitimate Reservation and the application of these categories. Lastly, it shall examine the relationship between these categories. The first rule of testing the logic of any cause and effect tree includes clarity. For many people, miscommunication can result in less clarity. If the listener does not comprehend the speaker or understand the importance of the statement of the speaker, then there is no mutual agreement upon a certain factor (Dettmer, Year). This category demands for more explanation of a certain fact, so that the hypothesis can be validated easily. Clarity reservation therefore requires further explanation of a certain thing (Goldratt-TOC Ltd EU Home, n.d). For example, if the statement is, ‘It is hot in this room’. The statement is unclear, because there is no ‘cause’ of the ‘effect’ of the level of temperature in the room. Therefore, the sentence requires clarity. The cause would perhaps include ‘It is hot in this room because the air conditioner is not working’. This is a complete statement. The existence of the entity forms the second CLR. If a certain statement is not fully complete or structurally sound or at the face value does not seem valid to the listener, then the entire logic is wrong. Therefore, for an entity to exist, it has to be complete and grammatically sound. The term “economic growth” cannot exist on its own. The speaker has to state, “What is economic growth” for it to completely exist (Dettmer, 2007). The third CLR consists of casualty existence. For any cause-effect relationship to work effectively, it is important to analyze whether there is any link between the cause and the effect. The cause-effect relationship must make sense when read out aloud. Moreover, either the cause or the effect needs to be tangible, in order to make the relationship work. Citing the example from William Dettmer, if your boss is dissatisfied, then you do not get a salary rise. Therefore, the cause is neither intangible nor observable, but the effect is (Dettmer, 2007). Another Category of Legitimate Reservation includes Cause insufficiency. Again, it examines the aspect of cause in the relationship. If the cause works only in certain circumstances, then it has to be stated as another cause. If the presenter’s case contains a cause application only by certain dependent factors, then this principle of LR is used. For example, the sentence ‘we are feeling hot’ may have two or more causes. It could be because the air conditioner does not exist, or if it is not working. A certain effect may have occurred because of a number of causes, which might wholly be unrelated to each other. In this case, the reservation of additional cause may be used by the speaker to explain that if your house gets damaged, then it may have occurred due to either gas leak or an earthquake (Dettmer, 2007). Sometimes, an effect may seem the cause or vice versa. When writing down the cause and the effect relationship, the cause-effect reversal becomes a problem (Dettmer, 2007). For example, if fever caused dizziness, which resulted in taking of an aspirin, then if the aspirin caused more dizziness, then is dizziness the cause or an effect? Therefore, the cause-effect reversal category holds importance. The Predicted Effect Existence Effect is used by taking advantage of another effect to show that the cause did not result in the initial effect. For example, if appendicitis is caused by pain in abdomen, then if nausea and elevated white blood cell is seen, then only will it be appendicitis. If nausea and elevated white blood cell count does not occur, then the pain in the stomach is NOT appendicitis (Dettmer, 2007). Tautology tests and validates the entire logic of the cause-effect relationship. It is known as circular knowledge and forms part of another CLR. The relationship between different categories of legitimate reservations becomes profound when tautology is carried out. Mostly, it is done when causality existence is carried out, and if no additional predicted effect is found. The effect provides the rationale of the cause, and if it does not, the logic is not validated completely. For example, Manchester United lost the game because they played poorly. If this sentence is questioned by “How can you say that they played poorly”, then the presenter can easily state “They lost the game”. Therefore, the effect justifies the cause. The circular loop becomes complete (Dettmer, 2007). There is a particular relationship between these categories of legitimate reservation. All of these categories are designed to validate the cause-effect relationship in different ways. For example, there is a direct link between insufficient cause reservation and additional cause reservation. If the scrutinizer finds an insufficient cause for a certain effect, the presenter must provide an additional cause for the validation of the entire logic. These two causes cannot exist on their own, and need to be linked together. Therefore, categories of legitimate reservation act as proof-reading supplies for the testing of cause-effect trees. They raise valid concerns about the cause and effect relationship. In this sense, they are largely important in theories of management (Online Guide to Theory of constraints, n.d). References Category of Legitimate Reservation (CLR). (n.d.). Goldratt-TOC Ltd EU Home. Retrieved August 12, 2011, from http://www.goldratt-toc.eu/thinkingprocesses/tpdp/Appendix/CLR1to5.htm Dettmer, W. (2007). Chapter 2: Categories of Legitimate Reservation. The logical thinking process: a systems approach to complex problem solving (pp. 34-60). Milwaukee: Quality Press. Theory of Constraints Thinking Process Categories of Legitimate Reservation. (n.d.). Online Guide to Theory of Constraints - A Must See. Retrieved August 12, 2011, from http://www.dbrmfg.co.nz/Thinking%20Process%20Categori Read More