Sociology and Crime: Juvenile Delinquency - Term Paper Example

? What Else? A Philosophical examination of juvenile delinquency Brooke Fox Academia-Research Company Discussion Juvenile delinquency merits a discussion that drives a stake through symmetry, rendering its subject matter probably one of the most difficult to debate from a subjective viewpoint. If Newton’s Law of opposites holds any bearing, that bearing would find here a perfect ground for breeding its notions. Crime within the juvenile populace no doubt remains an American issue of considerable significance, yet it writes off beautifully when seen from a romantic standpoint, in spite of its black face acknowledged with fervor as the shadowed profile in some of the media’s most exciting crime films. However at times this storyline may render itself too much in too little time for its juvenile gang members, the zeal to combat boredom lending an animalistic blood pumping through their veins, drawbacks exist in a magnetic negative, in spite of their tendency to be ambiguous. The following pages spend a precious small effort in seeking to explore the surprising while working companionably to endow readers with some kind of realistic sense of the jovial life of certain gang members. Simultaneously the pen teases the imagination by endeavoring to lead a journey through a poet’s land of the unexpected. While acknowledging the potential difficulties of crime the mastering ‘what else’ question continually reminds its readers that much is to be uncovered. The usual must support an eye that strives to have sharper than normal vision, more clearly eagle-positioned. Generalizations fraught by national statistics concerning United States criminology pale mundanely, hanging on a billboard sign in the front while the wolves ravage the land behind them. Compilation of facts and figures are incomplete as well as traditionally inconsistent. Undoubtedly methodology will not ever be able to exist solely within a subjective parameter. Hence, the premise of this essay concerns itself with an enlightening view of personal experience up to a certain point in its struggle to allow room for a widely-rounded eyeglass, favoring a collaboration of perspectives. Despite its enigmatic philosophy, a finite amount of truth reveals itself upon examination among lust and desire to make the country better. This takes the reader past the ‘what else’ creative rouser, offering a beacon of hope in a situation which seems hopeless with in sight no ending. The blackened sheep may not be doomed to some midnight ravaging, in spite of the delinquent’s life of trials and error. The country has a black face. Yet, if delinquents can find sensationalism in a life of ‘red herring,’ the country can joyfully take up the arms of responsibility. The flag is glowing. What Else? A Philosophical Examination of Juvenile Delinquency Juvenile offense is an extremely multi-varied subject. The wealth of information on the topic contains components which are themselves ten times multiplied. But, in spite of the almost confounding numerical material ravaging and devouring this handicap of teens, the relationship between such material and reality leads to one truth simple and nearly innate. As a pre-requisite to the examination of delinquency among adolescents, the study of wolf packs makes itself relevant. Female wolf-packs, more scientifically defined as groups theorize that being part of an unexpected formation proves to be at times more valuable than not. In a study done in the Hwange National Park region of Zimbabwe between the years of July 1992 up through November 1998, an interesting yet unsurprising case was documented. The chosen candidates for the formation of the establishment was composed of an adult male protecting three yearling pups, one of which harbored an only partially-formed hind-leg. Formidably contesting this group, a unit of four healthy adult males toed the line of battle. The female members of the Canis lupus genus made a pact with the former by a mutually formed consensus among their party. The rather unlikely conglomeration created a pack. The wolves obviously sought out a sense of belonging. In spite of inconsistency of biased research, one must regularly make the acquaintance of real patterns through the cloudiness of methods, which offer the pleasure of hard truth. One must look at the factors. Items such as poverty, lack of discipline, poor family support status, peer relations, the role of the media, and substance abuse compose perhaps only a few on a long list of possible contributors to the problem, many of which branch off from the stated. But what are the factors? There is nothing which directly causes the crime. “Many animals are known to live in a so-called aggregation economy, in which individuals experience higher foraging payoffs in the group, at least for some group sizes, than they would as solitaries” (Vucetich, Peterson, &Wait, 2004). There is no such thing as perfection. Perhaps those pondering a link to history of sexual abuse, witness of parental violence, substance abuse, neglect, or numerous health development, and/or emotional issues should take the time to re-create the Homo sapien. Although the fallacy of the human is consistently universal, the collected facts of juvenile delinquency remain its decided opponent. It must be acknowledged that generalizations portray fluent due to their welcomed simplicity. In 2006, the difficulty of in-depth examinations of the topic again became eliminated via crude reports, denoted with titles such as ‘official estimates’ and ‘national percentages.’ Statistically 42% of all violent meanwhile 26% of property crime arrests cleared away a discussion of conflict clarifying their whereabouts through uniform consensus; 22 million juvenile arrests squared their rough fringes. National data also commented on the fraction of the country’s delinquents which received special educational services, an amount which cleanly totaled 33.4%. Yet these same juvenile youths do not enjoy the privilege of this easy placement. In fact, they acknowledge the penchant to generalize and its drawbacks. Upon an individual question-basis Insane Vice Lords member Albert McGee stated, “Contrary to popular belief, I didn’t join because I lacked a family. For me, it was simply a matter of my surroundings . . . On the streets I’m just another gangbanger trying to survive the war” (Juvenile Crime OPPOSING VIEWPIONTS, 1997). Some number among juvenile gang-delinquents seek to build and destroy upon the governmental system. Theirs to fight lives the taut battle of tyranny suppression on a land which belongs to another culture. An interview conducted by Ahmed Nassef with gang member Baby Nerve at the tapering of the 1992 Los Angeles riots reported in an original KPFK radio interview, in which four police officers of Caucasian color enjoyed acquittal of brutality charges in the black motorist Rodney King beating structures the notion. Quotes Nerve, “It’s frustration with the white man’s system. They created the system. We didn’t have any say in it, we’re just people living in their society in which they control us in every way.” The interviewee drives his attack in his subsequent response, “Build and destroy. We’re going to build ourselves and we’re going to destroy their system. That’s what we want to do” (as cited in Juvenile Crime OPPOSING VIEWPOINTS, 1997). Researcher David Bordua writes in his classic 1961 critique on the theory of juvenile delinquency that delinquent gangs made quite a gaiety, suggesting that “fun, profit, glory, and freedom is a combination hard to beat, particularly for the inadequate conventional institutions which form the competition.” His mind might be somewhat synchronized with Dr. Phil Willis in his Learning to Labor book. The particular form of Willis’s thought is singularly riveting. Comprehending the adolescents’ ability to ‘have a laugh’ in a multi-faceted sense, symbolizing an array of characterizing qualities about the situation of the youths, the root of a tree sprouting an infinite number of benefits rises, from which the members of juvenile delinquency consistently profit. Images likening ‘arousal,’ ‘aggression,’ and ‘warrior mentality,’ can be found detailing a description of those adventures that reek with the scent of gangs. Gangs own the savor for creation. The code of the streets in largely impoverished urban cities holds a need for respect, an earning extremely difficult to win though perhaps harder to retain once it has been accomplished. Symbols enclose a delicate beauty honed by a black hand in the gang’s meters. Demonstrating this in a lively fashion, the study of a gang through Roger H. Davis’s estimates conclude nothing short of rich coincidence. Patterned, choosing scientific methodology in a step fashion, the detailed processes of the case move through a nearly plot-base summation. The story’s natural line of course threaded as a result of a search wrought which sought the action’s source. Once discerned, excitement and arousal reached out with hands that clinched the clan tightly. Loaned momentum by this force of added flavor, group members spurred the moment in an unplanned act of unacknowledged lust. To the unmarked identity, a mesmerizing act of security, power, and status won by hard measures presented itself according to the rules that characterizes all similar circumstances. Notwithstanding a long list of hypothesizing attempts, conclusion of this case fulfilled a need deemed quite evident. Eleven-year-old Chicagoan Robert (a.k.a. Yummy) Sandifer murdered a fourteen-year-old girl before later becoming himself slain by his gang members. Factors of ‘What Else’ invest in this group’s well-depicted intellect. Symbolized by a star with fourteen points, love, life, and loyalty branching into wisdom, knowledge, and understanding may imbue some surprise as to their thoughtfulness. Rules of the organization mandated that its participants bear a tattoo on the consummation of drugs known to be addicting. A beacon of hope may be a beckoning light-house via this particular organization’s qualities to those who seek such characteristics for uniquely personal reasons. Gangs are in every sense dynamic, as no doubt the reasons must be for delinquent crime. Yet, beyond all of the factors which remain obvious due to mundane matters of simplicity, generalization presents itself unconditionally careworn over time until finally its holes cannot be ignored. Therefore examiners of delinquent crime come to be led by the herder that brings Socratic questioners to ‘What Else?’ Through the moth-demolished coat of figures containing lists bred by quintessential data chronology, observers must look to newly-intriguing itinerary which cause shop-keepers to bow their heads at the hole opening a view to the other shop window. At this glance the following become apparent: 1. Animals are intellectual, and do not always follow the rules. 2. Sensationalism drives an enormous vehicle in the thrust of momentum that carries the action. 3. A gang’s identity provides a stage for dress-up in which novel identities are discovered. 4. Crime is about the moment of rupture. 5. The ability to have a laugh provides a unique temptation only found in certain delinquent societies. 6. A gang’s work is committed to story, in the spontaneous manner in which a poet writes, following no rules except for raw, animalistic favor. 7. Juvenile delinquents infallibly love the spontaneous gift packaged only with a pattern of animalism, and only predictable as such. Delinquents spin off from their track-record in a flight to pursue. Gangs can offer a wide-variety of items in fulfillment of a membership’s hopes and dreams, yet their crux only leads them to one, round conclusion: a missing chunk, out of which the rest is mere enigmatic fancy. The gang-life may by a broken fish-net, or it may boast a partied night-life. Interspersed defiant levels of some of the participants will most-likely lead them into a work-force in which they will be stationed at the fore, in ready salute. The dice will roll on the other poor unfortunates leading them to a band of blackened sheep, doomed to a life without an end, scouring aimlessly across the pastures. Juvenile delinquents live a life of choice more liberal at times than most, ripe with instinct, needs, and desires, but at the end of a day of fine research, one can only come to one, hard truth. Like Hell out of all fire. They aren’t changing for them. The rose of delinquent juvenile blooming cast its scent over a life that is impossible to compose, or extremely psychiatric. A spirit of free will runs rampant as well, making many disciplinary measures for naught. Even still, this does not mean that such should not be attempted. John J. DiIulio Jr. states in “Arresting Ideas” that, “Americans are sitting on a demographic crime bomb.” This particular Princeton University professor also states that efforts to keep violent recidivist criminals behind bars doubled. “As the next wave of crime draws near we must remain deadly serious about targeting hardened adult and juvenile criminals for arrest, prosecution, and incarceration” (as cited in Juvenile Crime OPPOSING VIEWPOINTS, 1997). Harsher penalties insulating trends of growing juvenile delinquency as well as those with a more mellow tone grant the country with the honorable responsibility of taking the stand. In 2006 national report findings, the proportion of crimes cleared in the year 2003 for murder alone staggers scholars at its high percentage of 62%. Yet with motorcycle theft only 13% were liberated. The diverting joy in this case may have surpassed mere cavorting. Thus, in spite of its theatrical preferences, delinquency among youths is above all a war. While theirs is a fight that can only be broken down into factors of ‘What Else,’ the fight of America knows no enigmatic qualities at all. The bullet smokes the fire from Hell but beauty will always be found in the black face. Even if the face is of the life of a criminal, pumping excitement flushes it with a glowing pallor. Thus, if in such statistics as these, those that are numbers still have zeal for a fight, can not America? The flag mocks the ‘What Else.’ References Bender, D., Leone, B., A.E., S., & Barbour, S. (Eds). (1997). Juvenile crime OPPOSING VIEWPOINTS. San Diego, CA: Grandhaven Press, Inc. Dalun, Z., Hsien-Yuan, H., Katsiyannis, A., Barrett, D.E., & Song, J. (2011). Adolescents with disabilities in the juvenile justice system: Patterns of recidivism. Exceptional Children, 77(3), 283-296. Retrieved from EBSCO host. John, H. (1997, September). Defiance and despair: Subcultural and structural linkages between delinquency and despair in the life course. Social Forces, 76(1), 119- 134. Retrieved from JSTOR. McCreery, E., & Robbins, R. L. (2001). Proximate explanations for failed pack formation in lycaon pictus. Behavior, 138(11/12), 1467-1479. doi:10.1163/156853901317367708 Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Vucetich, J. A., Peterson, R. O., & Waite, T. A. (2004). Raven scavenging favours group foraging in wolves. Animal Behavior, 67: 1117-1126. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.06.018 Read More